{"title":"另一种助推器:亚特兰大体育场建设的黑人新闻报道","authors":"Adrianne Grubic","doi":"10.1080/17512786.2023.2257649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTFrom 1960 until 2017, Atlanta’s commitment to sports could be seen in the construction of multiple stadiums. These projects came at a price, usually taking away space from established Black neighborhoods. This article analyzes how the Black press wrote about the effect on their own communities. More than 300 articles from the conservative Atlanta Daily World and its weekly counterparts, The Atlanta Inquirer and The Atlanta Voice were collected. The results of the analysis suggest that newspaper coverage perpetuated existing social disparities, that boosterism prevails in local coverage, and the Black press in Atlanta contributed to the capitalistic discourses surrounding stadium construction. Black newspapers did not always act as an advocate for those affected by stadium construction, but instead displayed boosterish tendencies similar to large local dailies, by picking and choosing whose stories to cover based on the city’s class structure. Nonetheless, as the newspapers displayed boosterish tendencies it is marked with an asterisk. Journalists also asked for job creation for the Black community and reimbursement for lost community spaces such as churches, as well as highlighting the enduring spirit of community despite decades of neighborhood erasure because of sport.KEYWORDS: Black PressAtlantastadiumssportboosterismplace Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":47909,"journal":{"name":"Journalism Practice","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Different Kind of Boosterism: Black Press Coverage of Atlanta Stadium Construction\",\"authors\":\"Adrianne Grubic\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17512786.2023.2257649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTFrom 1960 until 2017, Atlanta’s commitment to sports could be seen in the construction of multiple stadiums. These projects came at a price, usually taking away space from established Black neighborhoods. This article analyzes how the Black press wrote about the effect on their own communities. More than 300 articles from the conservative Atlanta Daily World and its weekly counterparts, The Atlanta Inquirer and The Atlanta Voice were collected. The results of the analysis suggest that newspaper coverage perpetuated existing social disparities, that boosterism prevails in local coverage, and the Black press in Atlanta contributed to the capitalistic discourses surrounding stadium construction. Black newspapers did not always act as an advocate for those affected by stadium construction, but instead displayed boosterish tendencies similar to large local dailies, by picking and choosing whose stories to cover based on the city’s class structure. Nonetheless, as the newspapers displayed boosterish tendencies it is marked with an asterisk. Journalists also asked for job creation for the Black community and reimbursement for lost community spaces such as churches, as well as highlighting the enduring spirit of community despite decades of neighborhood erasure because of sport.KEYWORDS: Black PressAtlantastadiumssportboosterismplace Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":47909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journalism Practice\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journalism Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2257649\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2257649","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Different Kind of Boosterism: Black Press Coverage of Atlanta Stadium Construction
ABSTRACTFrom 1960 until 2017, Atlanta’s commitment to sports could be seen in the construction of multiple stadiums. These projects came at a price, usually taking away space from established Black neighborhoods. This article analyzes how the Black press wrote about the effect on their own communities. More than 300 articles from the conservative Atlanta Daily World and its weekly counterparts, The Atlanta Inquirer and The Atlanta Voice were collected. The results of the analysis suggest that newspaper coverage perpetuated existing social disparities, that boosterism prevails in local coverage, and the Black press in Atlanta contributed to the capitalistic discourses surrounding stadium construction. Black newspapers did not always act as an advocate for those affected by stadium construction, but instead displayed boosterish tendencies similar to large local dailies, by picking and choosing whose stories to cover based on the city’s class structure. Nonetheless, as the newspapers displayed boosterish tendencies it is marked with an asterisk. Journalists also asked for job creation for the Black community and reimbursement for lost community spaces such as churches, as well as highlighting the enduring spirit of community despite decades of neighborhood erasure because of sport.KEYWORDS: Black PressAtlantastadiumssportboosterismplace Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
期刊介绍:
ournalism Practice provides opportunities for reflective, critical and research-based studies focused on the professional practice of journalism. The emphasis on journalism practice does not imply any false or intellectually disabling disconnect between theory and practice, but simply an assertion that Journalism Practice’s primary concern is to analyse and explore issues of practice and professional relevance. Journalism Practice is an intellectually rigorous journal with all contributions being refereed anonymously by acknowledged international experts in the field. An intellectually lively, but professionally experienced, Editorial Board with a wide-ranging experience of journalism practice advises and supports the Editor. Journalism Practice is devoted to: the study and analysis of significant issues arising from journalism as a field of professional practice; relevant developments in journalism training and education, as well as the construction of a reflective curriculum for journalism; analysis of journalism practice across the distinctive but converging media platforms of magazines, newspapers, online, radio and television; and the provision of a public space for practice-led, scholarly contributions from journalists as well as academics. Journalism Practice’s ambitious scope includes: the history of journalism practice; the professional practice of journalism; journalism training and education; journalism practice and new technology; journalism practice and ethics; and journalism practice and policy.