心理健康、弹性商及其与教学效果的关系:干预计划的依据

CLOVIS NYAMI DJEUTCHA
{"title":"心理健康、弹性商及其与教学效果的关系:干预计划的依据","authors":"CLOVIS NYAMI DJEUTCHA","doi":"10.56648/aide-irj.v6i1.98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This quantitative-correlational research design determined the significant relationship between psychological well-being, resilience quotient, and teachers’ teaching effectiveness. A total of 96 respondents were used, and they were identified through Simple Random Sampling. Before the study, pilot testing was done to determine its reliability through the Cronbach Alpha with an overall value of 0.987, which is interpreted as “excellent.” The questionnaires were sent via e-mails to the respondents. The results of the level of teachers’ resilience revealed that the level of highest mean among the indicators of teachers’ psychological well-being goes to Self- acceptance, and autonomy with a mean weighted of 4.32 (SD=1.04) interpreted as “Agree” while the lowest mean goes to Environmental mastery and Positive relations with others with the mean score of 3.84 (SD=1.17) interpreted as “Moderately Disagree”. As to the level of teachers’ resilience quotient, the highest mean among the indicators of teachers’ resilience goes to Flexibility and Adaptability with a mean score of 5.16 (SD=0.81), interpreted as “Strongly Agree”, meaning Very Resilient. while the lowest mean goes to Social Connectivity, with a mean score of 4.80 (SD=1.01) is interpreted as “Agree”, which is resilient. Lastly, in terms of the level of teaching effectiveness of the respondents, the highest mean among the indicators of teacher’s teaching effectiveness goes to Cognitive Presence with a mean score of 5.28 (SD= 0.75) interpreted as Strongly Agree. Based on the findings of the study, it is concluded that the hypothesis stating that there was no significant relationship between demographic profile and psychological well-being was partially (or slightly) upheld. The hypothesis stating that there was no significant relationship between resiliency quotient and psychological well-being was partially upheld. The hypothesis stating that there was no significant relationship between resiliency quotient and teaching effectiveness was partly (or majority) upheld. Important recommendations were made at the end of the study. School Administrators may first consider implementing the intervention plan proposed by the researcher, which will help support teachers and students.
","PeriodicalId":486775,"journal":{"name":"AIDE Interdisciplinary Research Journal","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological Well-Being and Resilience Quotient and its Relationship to Teaching Effectiveness: Basis for Intervention Plan\",\"authors\":\"CLOVIS NYAMI DJEUTCHA\",\"doi\":\"10.56648/aide-irj.v6i1.98\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This quantitative-correlational research design determined the significant relationship between psychological well-being, resilience quotient, and teachers’ teaching effectiveness. A total of 96 respondents were used, and they were identified through Simple Random Sampling. Before the study, pilot testing was done to determine its reliability through the Cronbach Alpha with an overall value of 0.987, which is interpreted as “excellent.” The questionnaires were sent via e-mails to the respondents. The results of the level of teachers’ resilience revealed that the level of highest mean among the indicators of teachers’ psychological well-being goes to Self- acceptance, and autonomy with a mean weighted of 4.32 (SD=1.04) interpreted as “Agree” while the lowest mean goes to Environmental mastery and Positive relations with others with the mean score of 3.84 (SD=1.17) interpreted as “Moderately Disagree”. As to the level of teachers’ resilience quotient, the highest mean among the indicators of teachers’ resilience goes to Flexibility and Adaptability with a mean score of 5.16 (SD=0.81), interpreted as “Strongly Agree”, meaning Very Resilient. while the lowest mean goes to Social Connectivity, with a mean score of 4.80 (SD=1.01) is interpreted as “Agree”, which is resilient. Lastly, in terms of the level of teaching effectiveness of the respondents, the highest mean among the indicators of teacher’s teaching effectiveness goes to Cognitive Presence with a mean score of 5.28 (SD= 0.75) interpreted as Strongly Agree. Based on the findings of the study, it is concluded that the hypothesis stating that there was no significant relationship between demographic profile and psychological well-being was partially (or slightly) upheld. The hypothesis stating that there was no significant relationship between resiliency quotient and psychological well-being was partially upheld. The hypothesis stating that there was no significant relationship between resiliency quotient and teaching effectiveness was partly (or majority) upheld. Important recommendations were made at the end of the study. School Administrators may first consider implementing the intervention plan proposed by the researcher, which will help support teachers and students.
\",\"PeriodicalId\":486775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AIDE Interdisciplinary Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AIDE Interdisciplinary Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56648/aide-irj.v6i1.98\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDE Interdisciplinary Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56648/aide-irj.v6i1.98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本定量相关研究设计确定了心理健康、弹性商与教师教学效能之间的显著关系。调查对象共96人,采用简单随机抽样法进行识别。在研究之前,通过Cronbach Alpha进行先导检验来确定其信度,总体值为0.987,为“优秀”。问卷通过电子邮件发送给受访者。教师弹性水平结果显示,教师心理健康指标中,自我接纳和自主性的均值最高,平均权重为4.32 (SD=1.04),被解释为“同意”;环境掌握和与他人的积极关系的均值最低,平均权重为3.84 (SD=1.17),被解释为“中度不同意”。在教师弹性商水平上,弹性和适应性在教师弹性指标中平均值最高,为5.16 (SD=0.81),解释为“非常同意”,即非常有弹性。而最低的平均值是Social Connectivity,平均得分为4.80 (SD=1.01),被解释为“同意”,具有弹性。最后,就被调查者的教学有效性水平而言,在教师教学有效性的指标中,“认知在场”的平均得分最高,为5.28 (SD= 0.75),被解释为“强烈同意”。根据研究结果,我们得出结论,人口统计特征与心理健康之间没有显著关系的假设部分(或轻微)得到了支持。弹性商与心理健康无显著关系的假设得到部分支持。弹性商与教学效果无显著关系的假设得到部分(或大部分)支持。在研究结束时提出了重要的建议。学校管理者可以首先考虑实施研究者提出的干预计划,这将有助于支持教师和学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychological Well-Being and Resilience Quotient and its Relationship to Teaching Effectiveness: Basis for Intervention Plan
This quantitative-correlational research design determined the significant relationship between psychological well-being, resilience quotient, and teachers’ teaching effectiveness. A total of 96 respondents were used, and they were identified through Simple Random Sampling. Before the study, pilot testing was done to determine its reliability through the Cronbach Alpha with an overall value of 0.987, which is interpreted as “excellent.” The questionnaires were sent via e-mails to the respondents. The results of the level of teachers’ resilience revealed that the level of highest mean among the indicators of teachers’ psychological well-being goes to Self- acceptance, and autonomy with a mean weighted of 4.32 (SD=1.04) interpreted as “Agree” while the lowest mean goes to Environmental mastery and Positive relations with others with the mean score of 3.84 (SD=1.17) interpreted as “Moderately Disagree”. As to the level of teachers’ resilience quotient, the highest mean among the indicators of teachers’ resilience goes to Flexibility and Adaptability with a mean score of 5.16 (SD=0.81), interpreted as “Strongly Agree”, meaning Very Resilient. while the lowest mean goes to Social Connectivity, with a mean score of 4.80 (SD=1.01) is interpreted as “Agree”, which is resilient. Lastly, in terms of the level of teaching effectiveness of the respondents, the highest mean among the indicators of teacher’s teaching effectiveness goes to Cognitive Presence with a mean score of 5.28 (SD= 0.75) interpreted as Strongly Agree. Based on the findings of the study, it is concluded that the hypothesis stating that there was no significant relationship between demographic profile and psychological well-being was partially (or slightly) upheld. The hypothesis stating that there was no significant relationship between resiliency quotient and psychological well-being was partially upheld. The hypothesis stating that there was no significant relationship between resiliency quotient and teaching effectiveness was partly (or majority) upheld. Important recommendations were made at the end of the study. School Administrators may first consider implementing the intervention plan proposed by the researcher, which will help support teachers and students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Online Games on the Academic Performance of Pasian National High School Grade 9 Students Transformational Leadership Practices of Early Learning Center Administrators in the District of Columbia: Basis for Leadership Program Extent of Readiness and Challenges of Teachers of the Fast Learners in the Implementation of Education 4.0 Teachers’ Readiness and Teaching Performance in Inclusive Education: Their Relationship to the Implementation of Inclusive Education Program Psychological Well-Being and Resilience Quotient and its Relationship to Teaching Effectiveness: Basis for Intervention Plan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1