绿地外国直接投资作为欧洲区域与新兴国家之间技术合作的催化剂

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES European Planning Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-02 DOI:10.1080/09654313.2023.2264335
Ivan De Noni, Fiorenza Belussi, Yanting Gu
{"title":"绿地外国直接投资作为欧洲区域与新兴国家之间技术合作的催化剂","authors":"Ivan De Noni, Fiorenza Belussi, Yanting Gu","doi":"10.1080/09654313.2023.2264335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis research emphasizes the increasing role of emerging countries in the advancement of future technologies and investigates the extent to which greenfield foreign direct investments (FDIs) can represent a bridge capable of stimulating technological collaboration opportunities between European regions and emerging countries. Utilizing a balanced panel dataset spanning 15 years from 2003 to 2017 and covering 286 European regions, we conducted a study that integrated collaborative patent data and foreign investments with emerging countries. Our findings indicate that technological collaboration primarily depends on inward FDIs (from emerging countries to Europe) rather than outward FDIs (from Europe to emerging countries). Furthermore, we discovered that a mutually reinforcing process can significantly enhance this collaboration. In this context, such a process acts as a cornerstone for the European Union (EU), offering a potential solution to navigate the paradoxical pressure between the rise of protectionism in response to the imbalances and inequalities stemming from globalization and the need to promote an environment conducive to global openness, competition and innovation.KEYWORDS: Technological collaborationgreenfield investmentsinward and outward foreign direct investmentsEuropean regionsemerging economies Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 We are aware of the limits of this choice since the globalisation of innovation is not confined to greenfield (or brownfield) FDIs but involves other forms of investments, such as the outsourcing of R&D activities to foreign partners or R&D strategic alliances (D’Agostino and Santangelo Citation2012).2 In this study, we limited our analysis to EPO patents. We assume that EPO patents are likely to cover at least the most qualitative outputs of the collaborative process between European regions and emerging countries. Moreover, the stringent standards of the European patent examination process assure higher data quality and affordability.3 Despite the limitations concerning the use of patents to measure technological collaborations, this choice is validated in the literature because patents are often used as a proxy to measure the degree of innovation (Kim and Lee Citation2015) as well as of collaboration (De Noni, Ganzaroli, and Orsi Citation2017, De Noni, Orsi, and Belussi Citation2018). In turn, they have been found to be strongly reliable (Acs, Anselin, and Varga Citation2002).4 We also check the model with total inward and outward European FDIs (exclude total bi-directional FDIs with BRICS), and the results are consistent.","PeriodicalId":48292,"journal":{"name":"European Planning Studies","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Greenfield FDIs as a catalyst for technological collaborations between European regions and emerging countries\",\"authors\":\"Ivan De Noni, Fiorenza Belussi, Yanting Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09654313.2023.2264335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis research emphasizes the increasing role of emerging countries in the advancement of future technologies and investigates the extent to which greenfield foreign direct investments (FDIs) can represent a bridge capable of stimulating technological collaboration opportunities between European regions and emerging countries. Utilizing a balanced panel dataset spanning 15 years from 2003 to 2017 and covering 286 European regions, we conducted a study that integrated collaborative patent data and foreign investments with emerging countries. Our findings indicate that technological collaboration primarily depends on inward FDIs (from emerging countries to Europe) rather than outward FDIs (from Europe to emerging countries). Furthermore, we discovered that a mutually reinforcing process can significantly enhance this collaboration. In this context, such a process acts as a cornerstone for the European Union (EU), offering a potential solution to navigate the paradoxical pressure between the rise of protectionism in response to the imbalances and inequalities stemming from globalization and the need to promote an environment conducive to global openness, competition and innovation.KEYWORDS: Technological collaborationgreenfield investmentsinward and outward foreign direct investmentsEuropean regionsemerging economies Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 We are aware of the limits of this choice since the globalisation of innovation is not confined to greenfield (or brownfield) FDIs but involves other forms of investments, such as the outsourcing of R&D activities to foreign partners or R&D strategic alliances (D’Agostino and Santangelo Citation2012).2 In this study, we limited our analysis to EPO patents. We assume that EPO patents are likely to cover at least the most qualitative outputs of the collaborative process between European regions and emerging countries. Moreover, the stringent standards of the European patent examination process assure higher data quality and affordability.3 Despite the limitations concerning the use of patents to measure technological collaborations, this choice is validated in the literature because patents are often used as a proxy to measure the degree of innovation (Kim and Lee Citation2015) as well as of collaboration (De Noni, Ganzaroli, and Orsi Citation2017, De Noni, Orsi, and Belussi Citation2018). In turn, they have been found to be strongly reliable (Acs, Anselin, and Varga Citation2002).4 We also check the model with total inward and outward European FDIs (exclude total bi-directional FDIs with BRICS), and the results are consistent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Planning Studies\",\"volume\":\"150 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Planning Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2023.2264335\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Planning Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2023.2264335","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究强调了新兴国家在未来技术进步中日益重要的作用,并探讨了绿地外国直接投资(fdi)在多大程度上可以成为促进欧洲地区与新兴国家之间技术合作机会的桥梁。利用2003 - 2017年跨越15年、覆盖欧洲286个地区的平衡面板数据,我们对新兴国家的合作专利数据和外国投资进行了整合研究。我们的研究结果表明,技术合作主要依赖于内向的外国直接投资(从新兴国家到欧洲)而不是外向的外国直接投资(从欧洲到新兴国家)。此外,我们发现一个相互加强的过程可以显著地加强这种合作。在这种背景下,这一进程是欧盟的基石,为应对全球化带来的失衡和不平等而兴起的保护主义与促进有利于全球开放、竞争和创新的环境之间的矛盾压力提供了一种潜在的解决方案。关键词:技术合作、绿地投资、对外直接投资、欧洲地区、新兴经济体披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1:我们意识到这种选择的局限性,因为创新的全球化并不局限于绿地(或棕地)外国直接投资,而是涉及其他形式的投资,例如将研发活动外包给外国合作伙伴或研发战略联盟(D 'Agostino和Santangelo Citation2012)在本研究中,我们的分析仅限于EPO专利。我们假设EPO专利可能至少涵盖欧洲地区和新兴国家之间合作过程中最定性的产出。此外,欧洲专利审查程序的严格标准确保了更高的数据质量和可负担性尽管使用专利来衡量技术合作存在局限性,但这种选择在文献中得到了验证,因为专利经常被用作衡量创新程度(Kim和Lee Citation2015)以及合作程度(De Noni, Ganzaroli和Orsi Citation2017, De Noni, Orsi和Belussi Citation2018)的代理。反过来,他们被发现是非常可靠的(Acs, Anselin, and Varga Citation2002)我们还用欧洲对外直接投资总额(不包括金砖国家的双向直接投资总额)检验了该模型,结果是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Greenfield FDIs as a catalyst for technological collaborations between European regions and emerging countries
ABSTRACTThis research emphasizes the increasing role of emerging countries in the advancement of future technologies and investigates the extent to which greenfield foreign direct investments (FDIs) can represent a bridge capable of stimulating technological collaboration opportunities between European regions and emerging countries. Utilizing a balanced panel dataset spanning 15 years from 2003 to 2017 and covering 286 European regions, we conducted a study that integrated collaborative patent data and foreign investments with emerging countries. Our findings indicate that technological collaboration primarily depends on inward FDIs (from emerging countries to Europe) rather than outward FDIs (from Europe to emerging countries). Furthermore, we discovered that a mutually reinforcing process can significantly enhance this collaboration. In this context, such a process acts as a cornerstone for the European Union (EU), offering a potential solution to navigate the paradoxical pressure between the rise of protectionism in response to the imbalances and inequalities stemming from globalization and the need to promote an environment conducive to global openness, competition and innovation.KEYWORDS: Technological collaborationgreenfield investmentsinward and outward foreign direct investmentsEuropean regionsemerging economies Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 We are aware of the limits of this choice since the globalisation of innovation is not confined to greenfield (or brownfield) FDIs but involves other forms of investments, such as the outsourcing of R&D activities to foreign partners or R&D strategic alliances (D’Agostino and Santangelo Citation2012).2 In this study, we limited our analysis to EPO patents. We assume that EPO patents are likely to cover at least the most qualitative outputs of the collaborative process between European regions and emerging countries. Moreover, the stringent standards of the European patent examination process assure higher data quality and affordability.3 Despite the limitations concerning the use of patents to measure technological collaborations, this choice is validated in the literature because patents are often used as a proxy to measure the degree of innovation (Kim and Lee Citation2015) as well as of collaboration (De Noni, Ganzaroli, and Orsi Citation2017, De Noni, Orsi, and Belussi Citation2018). In turn, they have been found to be strongly reliable (Acs, Anselin, and Varga Citation2002).4 We also check the model with total inward and outward European FDIs (exclude total bi-directional FDIs with BRICS), and the results are consistent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: European Planning Studies provides a forum for ideas and information about spatial development processes and policies in Europe. The journal publishes articles of a theoretical, empirical and policy-relevant nature and is particularly concerned to integrate knowledge of processes with practical policy proposals, implementation and evaluation. Articles of particular interest to the journal focus upon specific spatial development problems, as well as emerging explanations of new urban, regional, national or supranational developmental tendencies. Country-specific, region-specific or locality-specific issues are focused upon, although comparative analysis is of especial value.
期刊最新文献
Environmental acceptability of suburban sprawl around two differently sized Czech cities New collaborations and novel innovations: the role of regional brokerage and collaboration intensity Privatisations, FDI, and Greece’s regional economic recovery: an empirical study of perceptual view of investors Conceptualizing ‘green’ in urban and regional planning – the cases of Oslo and Helsinki What are the driving factors for implementing participatory budgeting? A case study from Czechia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1