{"title":"重塑媒体:用关怀民主回应监控资本家","authors":"Joseph Jones","doi":"10.1080/23736992.2023.2265343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis project explores the political economy, logic, strategies, agents, values, and ethical implications of this latest iteration of modern capitalism, and it seeks to delineate what surveillance capitalism is and what its consequences are for human dignity and worth. Using technologies of which they are ignorant, surveillance capitalists interfere with our ability to become ourselves individually and collectively. Without consent, they invade privacy, impede moral autonomy, harm democracy, and muddle care. Surveillance capitalists also violate a number of foundational ethical principles, failing the standards of Kant, Mill, and Aristotle. I sketch out a broad alternative to surveillance capitalism, one where our media systems are built on decentered understandings of a care-based democracy. Reinvigorating both the press and collective self-government, the caring digital citizen has less need for surveillance, requiring good faith understanding and the moral autonomy to pursue excellence. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 As a term, surveillance capitalism was used earlier by Foster and McChesney (Citation2014) but with different connotations related to financialization in the digital age.2 With surveillance capitalism, pinpointing the exact individual most susceptible to someone’s individual message.3 Fairclough (Citation2015) referred to this as member resources whereas Hall (Citation1980) described the cultural tools necessary for media decoding.4 Captured in Kant’s categorical imperative: Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.5 Thus, avoiding the tendency in the Global North for “the centrality of journalism [to generate] undemocratic journalism scholarship” by favoring narrow versions of journalism and democracy that exist in those very places (Zelizer, Citation2011, p. 469).6 I.e., the real personalization.7 A combination of the radical contingency of history/existence and the endless ingenuity, creativity and dialectical agency of humans.","PeriodicalId":45979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Ethics","volume":"292 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reclaiming Media: Answering Surveillance Capitalists with Care-Based Democracy\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23736992.2023.2265343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis project explores the political economy, logic, strategies, agents, values, and ethical implications of this latest iteration of modern capitalism, and it seeks to delineate what surveillance capitalism is and what its consequences are for human dignity and worth. Using technologies of which they are ignorant, surveillance capitalists interfere with our ability to become ourselves individually and collectively. Without consent, they invade privacy, impede moral autonomy, harm democracy, and muddle care. Surveillance capitalists also violate a number of foundational ethical principles, failing the standards of Kant, Mill, and Aristotle. I sketch out a broad alternative to surveillance capitalism, one where our media systems are built on decentered understandings of a care-based democracy. Reinvigorating both the press and collective self-government, the caring digital citizen has less need for surveillance, requiring good faith understanding and the moral autonomy to pursue excellence. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 As a term, surveillance capitalism was used earlier by Foster and McChesney (Citation2014) but with different connotations related to financialization in the digital age.2 With surveillance capitalism, pinpointing the exact individual most susceptible to someone’s individual message.3 Fairclough (Citation2015) referred to this as member resources whereas Hall (Citation1980) described the cultural tools necessary for media decoding.4 Captured in Kant’s categorical imperative: Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.5 Thus, avoiding the tendency in the Global North for “the centrality of journalism [to generate] undemocratic journalism scholarship” by favoring narrow versions of journalism and democracy that exist in those very places (Zelizer, Citation2011, p. 469).6 I.e., the real personalization.7 A combination of the radical contingency of history/existence and the endless ingenuity, creativity and dialectical agency of humans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Media Ethics\",\"volume\":\"292 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Media Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2023.2265343\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2023.2265343","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要本项目探讨了现代资本主义的政治经济、逻辑、策略、代理人、价值观和伦理含义,并试图描述什么是监视资本主义,以及它对人类尊严和价值的影响。监控资本家使用他们无知的技术,干扰我们成为自己的能力,无论是个人还是集体。未经同意,它们侵犯隐私,阻碍道德自主,损害民主,混淆医疗。监视资本家也违反了一些基本的道德原则,没有达到康德、穆勒和亚里士多德的标准。我概述了一个广泛的替代监视资本主义的方案,在这个方案中,我们的媒体系统建立在对以关怀为基础的民主的非中心化理解之上。通过重新激活媒体和集体自治,有爱心的数字公民对监督的需求减少了,这需要真诚的理解和追求卓越的道德自主权。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1作为一个术语,监控资本主义早在Foster和McChesney (Citation2014)使用过,但与数字时代的金融化有不同的内涵有了监控资本主义,准确地指出最容易受到某人个人信息影响的个人费尔克劳(Citation2015)将其称为成员资源,而霍尔(Citation1980)则描述了媒体解码所必需的文化工具康德的定言令式是这样的:只根据你同时希望它成为普遍法则的准则行动因此,通过支持那些地方存在的狭隘版本的新闻和民主,避免全球北方“新闻的中心[产生]不民主的新闻学术”的趋势(Zelizer, Citation2011, p. 469)也就是真正的个性化历史/存在的根本偶然性与人类无尽的独创性、创造力和辩证能动性的结合。
Reclaiming Media: Answering Surveillance Capitalists with Care-Based Democracy
ABSTRACTThis project explores the political economy, logic, strategies, agents, values, and ethical implications of this latest iteration of modern capitalism, and it seeks to delineate what surveillance capitalism is and what its consequences are for human dignity and worth. Using technologies of which they are ignorant, surveillance capitalists interfere with our ability to become ourselves individually and collectively. Without consent, they invade privacy, impede moral autonomy, harm democracy, and muddle care. Surveillance capitalists also violate a number of foundational ethical principles, failing the standards of Kant, Mill, and Aristotle. I sketch out a broad alternative to surveillance capitalism, one where our media systems are built on decentered understandings of a care-based democracy. Reinvigorating both the press and collective self-government, the caring digital citizen has less need for surveillance, requiring good faith understanding and the moral autonomy to pursue excellence. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 As a term, surveillance capitalism was used earlier by Foster and McChesney (Citation2014) but with different connotations related to financialization in the digital age.2 With surveillance capitalism, pinpointing the exact individual most susceptible to someone’s individual message.3 Fairclough (Citation2015) referred to this as member resources whereas Hall (Citation1980) described the cultural tools necessary for media decoding.4 Captured in Kant’s categorical imperative: Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.5 Thus, avoiding the tendency in the Global North for “the centrality of journalism [to generate] undemocratic journalism scholarship” by favoring narrow versions of journalism and democracy that exist in those very places (Zelizer, Citation2011, p. 469).6 I.e., the real personalization.7 A combination of the radical contingency of history/existence and the endless ingenuity, creativity and dialectical agency of humans.