{"title":"喷砂酸蚀和阳极表面牙种植体患者丙二醛水平的比较:一项前瞻性临床研究","authors":"Arvina Rajasekar, Sheeja S Varghese","doi":"10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2023047545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Inflammation that occur as a part of body's response to implant-tissue contact can result in oxidative stress. Therefore, exploring the oxidative stress around different surface treated dental implants is essential to improve the performance of implants. The purpose of this study was to detect and measure the level of malondialdehyde (MDA), oxidative stress marker among SLA, SLActive and TiUnite implant surfaces. Materials and Methods: Subjects with healthy dental implant were categorized into Group 1: SLA (n=25), Group 2: SLActive (n=25), Group 3: TiUnite (n=25). Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) was collected and MDA was quantified using ELISA kit. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc. Results: The MDA level was high in group 3 (6.49±0.29 nmol/mL) followed by group 1 (5.37±0.47 nmol/mL) and group 2 (4.37±0.22 nmol/mL). There was a significant difference in MDA levels between the three groups (p = 0.00). Also, pairwise comparison showed a statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.00). Conclusion: Malondialdehyde level in peri-implant crevicular fluid was high around TiUnite dental implant as compared to SLA and SLActive implants.","PeriodicalId":16125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARISON OF MALONDIALDEHYDE LEVELS AMONG PATIENTS WITH SANDBLASTED ACID-ETCHED AND ANODIZED SURFACE DENTAL IMPLANTS: A PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL STUDY\",\"authors\":\"Arvina Rajasekar, Sheeja S Varghese\",\"doi\":\"10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2023047545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Inflammation that occur as a part of body's response to implant-tissue contact can result in oxidative stress. Therefore, exploring the oxidative stress around different surface treated dental implants is essential to improve the performance of implants. The purpose of this study was to detect and measure the level of malondialdehyde (MDA), oxidative stress marker among SLA, SLActive and TiUnite implant surfaces. Materials and Methods: Subjects with healthy dental implant were categorized into Group 1: SLA (n=25), Group 2: SLActive (n=25), Group 3: TiUnite (n=25). Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) was collected and MDA was quantified using ELISA kit. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc. Results: The MDA level was high in group 3 (6.49±0.29 nmol/mL) followed by group 1 (5.37±0.47 nmol/mL) and group 2 (4.37±0.22 nmol/mL). There was a significant difference in MDA levels between the three groups (p = 0.00). Also, pairwise comparison showed a statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.00). Conclusion: Malondialdehyde level in peri-implant crevicular fluid was high around TiUnite dental implant as compared to SLA and SLActive implants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2023047545\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2023047545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
COMPARISON OF MALONDIALDEHYDE LEVELS AMONG PATIENTS WITH SANDBLASTED ACID-ETCHED AND ANODIZED SURFACE DENTAL IMPLANTS: A PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL STUDY
Objective: Inflammation that occur as a part of body's response to implant-tissue contact can result in oxidative stress. Therefore, exploring the oxidative stress around different surface treated dental implants is essential to improve the performance of implants. The purpose of this study was to detect and measure the level of malondialdehyde (MDA), oxidative stress marker among SLA, SLActive and TiUnite implant surfaces. Materials and Methods: Subjects with healthy dental implant were categorized into Group 1: SLA (n=25), Group 2: SLActive (n=25), Group 3: TiUnite (n=25). Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) was collected and MDA was quantified using ELISA kit. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc. Results: The MDA level was high in group 3 (6.49±0.29 nmol/mL) followed by group 1 (5.37±0.47 nmol/mL) and group 2 (4.37±0.22 nmol/mL). There was a significant difference in MDA levels between the three groups (p = 0.00). Also, pairwise comparison showed a statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.00). Conclusion: Malondialdehyde level in peri-implant crevicular fluid was high around TiUnite dental implant as compared to SLA and SLActive implants.
期刊介绍:
MEDICAL IMPLANTS are being used in every organ of the human body. Ideally, medical implants must have biomechanical properties comparable to those of autogenous tissues without any adverse effects. In each anatomic site, studies of the long-term effects of medical implants must be undertaken to determine accurately the safety and performance of the implants. Today, implant surgery has become an interdisciplinary undertaking involving a number of skilled and gifted specialists. For example, successful cochlear implants will involve audiologists, audiological physicians, speech and language therapists, otolaryngologists, nurses, neuro-otologists, teachers of the deaf, hearing therapists, cochlear implant manufacturers, and others involved with hearing-impaired and deaf individuals.