{"title":"固体氧化物半封闭CO2循环的技术经济分析及与其他CO2捕集发电循环的比较","authors":"Matteo Martinelli, Roberto Scaccabarozzi, Manuele Gatti, Stefano Campanari, Emanuele Martelli","doi":"10.1115/1.4063740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This work presents the techno-economic analysis of the Solid oxide semi-closed CO2 cycle (SOS-CO2), a hybrid semiclosed cycle with solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) recently developed by Politecnico di Milano for power generation from natural gas with near-zero CO2 emissions. The cycle is able to achieve an outstanding net electric efficiency of 75.7%, capturing more than 99% of the generated CO2. All the cycles components have been designed and sized with the aim of assessing performance and capital cost. Performance and economic key performance indicators are compared with those of two benchmark technologies for power generation with CO2 capture: the Allam cycle and a combined cycle equipped with ammines for post-combustion capture. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis is performed on the forecasted cost of natural gas and SOFC stacks. The results indicate that the specific total capital requirement of the SOS-CO2 cycle (2.52k€/kWel) is considerably higher than the Allam cycle (1.93 k€/kWel) and combined cycle with post-combustion capture (1.98 k€/kWel). On the other hand, the SOS-CO2 cycle benefits from its far higher efficiency (73.3% vs. 53.9% of the Allam cycle and 52.8% of the combined cycle) which makes the cycle less sensitive to the fuel cost and CO2 tax. In terms of cost of electricity, the SOS-CO2 cycle results the best technology for natural gas prices above 8 €/GJ, while the Allam cycle appears to be the preferred option at lower prices.","PeriodicalId":15685,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power-transactions of The Asme","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-Economic Analysis of the Solid Oxide Semi-Closed CO2 Cycle and Comparison with Other Power Generation Cycles with CO2 Capture\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Martinelli, Roberto Scaccabarozzi, Manuele Gatti, Stefano Campanari, Emanuele Martelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4063740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This work presents the techno-economic analysis of the Solid oxide semi-closed CO2 cycle (SOS-CO2), a hybrid semiclosed cycle with solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) recently developed by Politecnico di Milano for power generation from natural gas with near-zero CO2 emissions. The cycle is able to achieve an outstanding net electric efficiency of 75.7%, capturing more than 99% of the generated CO2. All the cycles components have been designed and sized with the aim of assessing performance and capital cost. Performance and economic key performance indicators are compared with those of two benchmark technologies for power generation with CO2 capture: the Allam cycle and a combined cycle equipped with ammines for post-combustion capture. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis is performed on the forecasted cost of natural gas and SOFC stacks. The results indicate that the specific total capital requirement of the SOS-CO2 cycle (2.52k€/kWel) is considerably higher than the Allam cycle (1.93 k€/kWel) and combined cycle with post-combustion capture (1.98 k€/kWel). On the other hand, the SOS-CO2 cycle benefits from its far higher efficiency (73.3% vs. 53.9% of the Allam cycle and 52.8% of the combined cycle) which makes the cycle less sensitive to the fuel cost and CO2 tax. In terms of cost of electricity, the SOS-CO2 cycle results the best technology for natural gas prices above 8 €/GJ, while the Allam cycle appears to be the preferred option at lower prices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power-transactions of The Asme\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power-transactions of The Asme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063740\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power-transactions of The Asme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063740","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Techno-Economic Analysis of the Solid Oxide Semi-Closed CO2 Cycle and Comparison with Other Power Generation Cycles with CO2 Capture
Abstract This work presents the techno-economic analysis of the Solid oxide semi-closed CO2 cycle (SOS-CO2), a hybrid semiclosed cycle with solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) recently developed by Politecnico di Milano for power generation from natural gas with near-zero CO2 emissions. The cycle is able to achieve an outstanding net electric efficiency of 75.7%, capturing more than 99% of the generated CO2. All the cycles components have been designed and sized with the aim of assessing performance and capital cost. Performance and economic key performance indicators are compared with those of two benchmark technologies for power generation with CO2 capture: the Allam cycle and a combined cycle equipped with ammines for post-combustion capture. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis is performed on the forecasted cost of natural gas and SOFC stacks. The results indicate that the specific total capital requirement of the SOS-CO2 cycle (2.52k€/kWel) is considerably higher than the Allam cycle (1.93 k€/kWel) and combined cycle with post-combustion capture (1.98 k€/kWel). On the other hand, the SOS-CO2 cycle benefits from its far higher efficiency (73.3% vs. 53.9% of the Allam cycle and 52.8% of the combined cycle) which makes the cycle less sensitive to the fuel cost and CO2 tax. In terms of cost of electricity, the SOS-CO2 cycle results the best technology for natural gas prices above 8 €/GJ, while the Allam cycle appears to be the preferred option at lower prices.
期刊介绍:
The ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power publishes archival-quality papers in the areas of gas and steam turbine technology, nuclear engineering, internal combustion engines, and fossil power generation. It covers a broad spectrum of practical topics of interest to industry. Subject areas covered include: thermodynamics; fluid mechanics; heat transfer; and modeling; propulsion and power generation components and systems; combustion, fuels, and emissions; nuclear reactor systems and components; thermal hydraulics; heat exchangers; nuclear fuel technology and waste management; I. C. engines for marine, rail, and power generation; steam and hydro power generation; advanced cycles for fossil energy generation; pollution control and environmental effects.