预测客户行为变化的教练能力

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Journal of Applied Behavioral Science Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1177/00218863231204050
Richard Boyatzis, Han Liu, Amy Smith, Kira Zwygart, Joann Quinn
{"title":"预测客户行为变化的教练能力","authors":"Richard Boyatzis, Han Liu, Amy Smith, Kira Zwygart, Joann Quinn","doi":"10.1177/00218863231204050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coaching as a practice and process has grown. Coach training and certification is currently based on competency models derived from opinion surveys not research on coaching outcomes. Competency models developed on expert opinion were about 50% accurate in terms of predicting managerial effectiveness in prior studies. To address this gap, we tested behavioral emotional and social intelligence competencies of coaches, not self-assessed, that predicted client behavior change over 2 years. The sample was 240 coach-client dyads involving 60 different coaches. Effective coach competencies were achievement orientation, adaptability, emotional self-control, empathy, organizational assessment, and influence. To rule out general mental ability (GMA) as a component, a subsample of 135 dyads based on 27 different coaches showed that GMA was not significant. In the subsample, effective competencies were the above list and conflict management, with near significant findings for coaching/mentoring and teamwork. More studies are needed to guide training and certification programs.","PeriodicalId":47903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Behavioral Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competencies of Coaches that Predict Client Behavior Change\",\"authors\":\"Richard Boyatzis, Han Liu, Amy Smith, Kira Zwygart, Joann Quinn\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00218863231204050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Coaching as a practice and process has grown. Coach training and certification is currently based on competency models derived from opinion surveys not research on coaching outcomes. Competency models developed on expert opinion were about 50% accurate in terms of predicting managerial effectiveness in prior studies. To address this gap, we tested behavioral emotional and social intelligence competencies of coaches, not self-assessed, that predicted client behavior change over 2 years. The sample was 240 coach-client dyads involving 60 different coaches. Effective coach competencies were achievement orientation, adaptability, emotional self-control, empathy, organizational assessment, and influence. To rule out general mental ability (GMA) as a component, a subsample of 135 dyads based on 27 different coaches showed that GMA was not significant. In the subsample, effective competencies were the above list and conflict management, with near significant findings for coaching/mentoring and teamwork. More studies are needed to guide training and certification programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Behavioral Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Behavioral Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863231204050\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863231204050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

教练作为一种实践和过程已经成长起来。教练培训和认证目前是基于来自民意调查的能力模型,而不是对教练结果的研究。在先前的研究中,根据专家意见开发的胜任力模型在预测管理有效性方面的准确率约为50%。为了解决这一差距,我们测试了教练的行为情感和社会智力能力,而不是自我评估,这些能力预测了2年内客户的行为变化。样本是240个教练-客户二组,涉及60个不同的教练。有效教练胜任力包括成就导向、适应性、情绪自我控制、共情、组织评估和影响力。为了排除一般心理能力(GMA)作为一个组成部分,基于27个不同教练的135对子样本显示GMA不显著。在子样本中,有效能力是上述列表和冲突管理,在指导/指导和团队合作方面有接近显著的发现。需要更多的研究来指导培训和认证项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Competencies of Coaches that Predict Client Behavior Change
Coaching as a practice and process has grown. Coach training and certification is currently based on competency models derived from opinion surveys not research on coaching outcomes. Competency models developed on expert opinion were about 50% accurate in terms of predicting managerial effectiveness in prior studies. To address this gap, we tested behavioral emotional and social intelligence competencies of coaches, not self-assessed, that predicted client behavior change over 2 years. The sample was 240 coach-client dyads involving 60 different coaches. Effective coach competencies were achievement orientation, adaptability, emotional self-control, empathy, organizational assessment, and influence. To rule out general mental ability (GMA) as a component, a subsample of 135 dyads based on 27 different coaches showed that GMA was not significant. In the subsample, effective competencies were the above list and conflict management, with near significant findings for coaching/mentoring and teamwork. More studies are needed to guide training and certification programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science was founded on the compelling observation that human beings and social systems undergo planned and unplanned change. Recognizing that individuals and groups may differ in how they create and evaluate change, the journal contributes to a body of knowledge about both change processes and outcomes. Toward this end, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science provides a forum for constructive conversations about research and practice. The specific goals of the journal are to (a) present a range of conceptual frameworks that explain, predict, and illuminate the implications of action; (b) describe social inventions, intervention techniques, consultation activities, emergent innovations, and educational practices.
期刊最新文献
Delivering impact via the ebb-and-flow of a research team: Reflection on a long-term program of research into a global societal challenge* Competencies of Coaches that Predict Client Behavior Change Clinical Action Research and Its Radically Reflexive Way: Dialogical Encounters to Face Current Organizational Needs The Harwood Manufacturing Corporation and the International Ladies’ Garment Workers Union: A Case of Role Reversal Collaborative Inquiry for Change and Changing: Advances in Science-Practice Transformations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1