巨大垂体腺瘤实现全切除的障碍

Hyuk Jang, Yeon Hee Im, Dong-Hyun Kim, Dong-Sup Chung, Wan-Soo Yoon
{"title":"巨大垂体腺瘤实现全切除的障碍","authors":"Hyuk Jang, Yeon Hee Im, Dong-Hyun Kim, Dong-Sup Chung, Wan-Soo Yoon","doi":"10.55911/jksbs.23.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Giant pituitary adenoma is a challenging disease in the neurosurgical field. Several therapeutic strategies have been performed depending on tumor characteristics and the surgeon’s experience during the last decades, but it is still difficult to achieve the gross total resection with good clinical outcome. Here, we present our clinical experience with giant pituitary adenomas (PAs) focusing on factors related to surgical outcome.
 Materials and Methods: A total of 26 patients with giant PAs were collected. All clinical data, including preoperative symptom, visual and hormonal function, operation record, and radiologic imaging, were reviewed. Statistical analysis was used to identify the factors related with the extent of resection.
 Results: The median age of patients was 53 years, and all patients showed impaired vision. Endo-scopic transsphenoidal surgery, staged operation, and open craniotomy were performed in 19, 5, and 2 patients, respectively. Fifteen patients received gross total resection, 14 patients received subtotal resection and 1 patient received partial resection. Postoperatively, visual function was improved in 14 patients, not changed in 6, and deteriorated in 4. Gross total resection was significantly related with the tumor size (45 mm), Knosp grade, ICA (internal carotid artery) encasement, and middle cranial fossa extension in the statistical analysis.
 Conclusions: Despite of the limited experience for giant PAs, it still hard to achieve the gross total resection and good clinical outcome. We recommend identifying the tumor characteristics that make it difficult to complete total resection before surgery and consider other strategies, such as staged op-eration or adjuvant radiotherapy.","PeriodicalId":49515,"journal":{"name":"Skull Base-An Interdisciplinary Approach","volume":"194 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hurdle of giant pituitary adenoma in achieving total resection\",\"authors\":\"Hyuk Jang, Yeon Hee Im, Dong-Hyun Kim, Dong-Sup Chung, Wan-Soo Yoon\",\"doi\":\"10.55911/jksbs.23.0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Giant pituitary adenoma is a challenging disease in the neurosurgical field. Several therapeutic strategies have been performed depending on tumor characteristics and the surgeon’s experience during the last decades, but it is still difficult to achieve the gross total resection with good clinical outcome. Here, we present our clinical experience with giant pituitary adenomas (PAs) focusing on factors related to surgical outcome.
 Materials and Methods: A total of 26 patients with giant PAs were collected. All clinical data, including preoperative symptom, visual and hormonal function, operation record, and radiologic imaging, were reviewed. Statistical analysis was used to identify the factors related with the extent of resection.
 Results: The median age of patients was 53 years, and all patients showed impaired vision. Endo-scopic transsphenoidal surgery, staged operation, and open craniotomy were performed in 19, 5, and 2 patients, respectively. Fifteen patients received gross total resection, 14 patients received subtotal resection and 1 patient received partial resection. Postoperatively, visual function was improved in 14 patients, not changed in 6, and deteriorated in 4. Gross total resection was significantly related with the tumor size (45 mm), Knosp grade, ICA (internal carotid artery) encasement, and middle cranial fossa extension in the statistical analysis.
 Conclusions: Despite of the limited experience for giant PAs, it still hard to achieve the gross total resection and good clinical outcome. We recommend identifying the tumor characteristics that make it difficult to complete total resection before surgery and consider other strategies, such as staged op-eration or adjuvant radiotherapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Skull Base-An Interdisciplinary Approach\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Skull Base-An Interdisciplinary Approach\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55911/jksbs.23.0020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skull Base-An Interdisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55911/jksbs.23.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:垂体巨大腺瘤是神经外科领域的一个具有挑战性的疾病。在过去的几十年里,根据肿瘤的特点和外科医生的经验,已经采取了几种治疗策略,但仍然很难实现具有良好临床效果的全切除。在此,我们介绍了我们治疗巨大垂体腺瘤(PAs)的临床经验,重点是与手术结果相关的因素。 材料与方法:收集巨大PAs患者26例。我们回顾了所有的临床资料,包括术前症状、视觉和激素功能、手术记录和放射影像。采用统计学方法分析与切除程度相关的因素。 结果:患者中位年龄53岁,均表现为视力受损。经蝶腔内镜手术19例,分阶段手术5例,开颅手术2例。全部切除15例,次全切除14例,部分切除1例。术后14例视力改善,6例无变化,4例视力恶化。统计学分析显示,大体全切除与肿瘤大小(45 mm)、Knosp分级、颈动脉内陷、中颅窝延伸程度显著相关。 结论:尽管对巨大PAs的治疗经验有限,但仍难以达到大体全切除和良好的临床效果。我们建议术前确定难以完全切除的肿瘤特征,并考虑其他策略,如分期手术或辅助放疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hurdle of giant pituitary adenoma in achieving total resection
Background: Giant pituitary adenoma is a challenging disease in the neurosurgical field. Several therapeutic strategies have been performed depending on tumor characteristics and the surgeon’s experience during the last decades, but it is still difficult to achieve the gross total resection with good clinical outcome. Here, we present our clinical experience with giant pituitary adenomas (PAs) focusing on factors related to surgical outcome. Materials and Methods: A total of 26 patients with giant PAs were collected. All clinical data, including preoperative symptom, visual and hormonal function, operation record, and radiologic imaging, were reviewed. Statistical analysis was used to identify the factors related with the extent of resection. Results: The median age of patients was 53 years, and all patients showed impaired vision. Endo-scopic transsphenoidal surgery, staged operation, and open craniotomy were performed in 19, 5, and 2 patients, respectively. Fifteen patients received gross total resection, 14 patients received subtotal resection and 1 patient received partial resection. Postoperatively, visual function was improved in 14 patients, not changed in 6, and deteriorated in 4. Gross total resection was significantly related with the tumor size (45 mm), Knosp grade, ICA (internal carotid artery) encasement, and middle cranial fossa extension in the statistical analysis. Conclusions: Despite of the limited experience for giant PAs, it still hard to achieve the gross total resection and good clinical outcome. We recommend identifying the tumor characteristics that make it difficult to complete total resection before surgery and consider other strategies, such as staged op-eration or adjuvant radiotherapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A case of iatrogenic septal lipoma after transsphenoidal approach of a pituitary surgery A study on the factors affecting the intention to register brain dead organ donation A dermoid cyst misdiagnosed as a lipoma in the auriculotemporal area Hurdle of giant pituitary adenoma in achieving total resection A collision tumor: Pituitary apoplexy caused by lung cancer metastasis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1