开放手术仍然是目前腹股沟疝治疗的一部分吗?

IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.22543/2392-7674.1413
Dan Bratu, Alin Mihetiu, Alexandra Sandu, Crenguta Serboiu, Corneliu Tudor, Laurentiu Simion, Dragos Cretoiu, Florin Bobirca, Dragos Davitoiu, Bogdan Serban, Claudiu Eduard Nistor
{"title":"开放手术仍然是目前腹股沟疝治疗的一部分吗?","authors":"Dan Bratu, Alin Mihetiu, Alexandra Sandu, Crenguta Serboiu, Corneliu Tudor, Laurentiu Simion, Dragos Cretoiu, Florin Bobirca, Dragos Davitoiu, Bogdan Serban, Claudiu Eduard Nistor","doi":"10.22543/2392-7674.1413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inguinal hernia repair represents one of the most frequent pathologies with surgical addressability. From the multitude of surgical procedures, a limited number still keep their indication in the current treatment of hernias. Open surgery, the exclusive repair method until recently, is associated with laparoscopic techniques with benefits that are at least superposable on those in open repair. We conducted a study, analyzing several types of procedures in open surgery and comparing them to each other, but also with the TAPP approach, which is still at the beginning in our service. The non-mesh procedures scored poorly in terms of recurrence, the duration of the surgical intervention, and complications of the pain type, the Lichtenstein procedure was frequently associated with non-infectious inflammatory complications, and the TAPP, which is still in the learning curve, presented a prolonged duration of the surgical intervention. The Lichtenstein procedure maintains its usefulness and represents the most frequent technique for sanctioning inguinal hernia, the non-mesh processes, less used lately, are more frequently preferred in situations where hernia strangulation is associated with a septic complication. Open surgery hernia repair remains a feasible option in the era of minimal invasiveness, especially under the conditions of performing a tension-free technique, for specific categories of patients or surgical services remaining the first intention solution.","PeriodicalId":43987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences","volume":"3 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is open surgery still part of the current treatment of inguinal hernias?\",\"authors\":\"Dan Bratu, Alin Mihetiu, Alexandra Sandu, Crenguta Serboiu, Corneliu Tudor, Laurentiu Simion, Dragos Cretoiu, Florin Bobirca, Dragos Davitoiu, Bogdan Serban, Claudiu Eduard Nistor\",\"doi\":\"10.22543/2392-7674.1413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Inguinal hernia repair represents one of the most frequent pathologies with surgical addressability. From the multitude of surgical procedures, a limited number still keep their indication in the current treatment of hernias. Open surgery, the exclusive repair method until recently, is associated with laparoscopic techniques with benefits that are at least superposable on those in open repair. We conducted a study, analyzing several types of procedures in open surgery and comparing them to each other, but also with the TAPP approach, which is still at the beginning in our service. The non-mesh procedures scored poorly in terms of recurrence, the duration of the surgical intervention, and complications of the pain type, the Lichtenstein procedure was frequently associated with non-infectious inflammatory complications, and the TAPP, which is still in the learning curve, presented a prolonged duration of the surgical intervention. The Lichtenstein procedure maintains its usefulness and represents the most frequent technique for sanctioning inguinal hernia, the non-mesh processes, less used lately, are more frequently preferred in situations where hernia strangulation is associated with a septic complication. Open surgery hernia repair remains a feasible option in the era of minimal invasiveness, especially under the conditions of performing a tension-free technique, for specific categories of patients or surgical services remaining the first intention solution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22543/2392-7674.1413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22543/2392-7674.1413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腹股沟疝修补是外科治疗中最常见的病理之一。从众多的外科手术中,在目前的疝气治疗中,有限的一些手术仍然保持着它们的指征。开放手术,唯一的修复方法,直到最近,是与腹腔镜技术的好处,至少重叠在那些开放修复。我们进行了一项研究,分析了几种开放手术的程序,并将它们相互比较,同时也与TAPP方法进行了比较,TAPP方法在我们的服务中仍处于起步阶段。非补片手术在复发、手术干预持续时间和疼痛类型并发症方面得分较低,利希滕斯坦手术经常伴有非感染性炎症并发症,TAPP仍处于学习阶段,手术干预持续时间较长。Lichtenstein手术保持了它的有效性,代表了腹股沟疝的最常用技术,非补片手术,最近较少使用,在疝绞窄与脓毒性并发症相关的情况下更常用。在微创时代,开放手术疝修补仍然是一种可行的选择,特别是在执行无张力技术的条件下,对于特定类别的患者或手术服务仍然是首选解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is open surgery still part of the current treatment of inguinal hernias?
Inguinal hernia repair represents one of the most frequent pathologies with surgical addressability. From the multitude of surgical procedures, a limited number still keep their indication in the current treatment of hernias. Open surgery, the exclusive repair method until recently, is associated with laparoscopic techniques with benefits that are at least superposable on those in open repair. We conducted a study, analyzing several types of procedures in open surgery and comparing them to each other, but also with the TAPP approach, which is still at the beginning in our service. The non-mesh procedures scored poorly in terms of recurrence, the duration of the surgical intervention, and complications of the pain type, the Lichtenstein procedure was frequently associated with non-infectious inflammatory complications, and the TAPP, which is still in the learning curve, presented a prolonged duration of the surgical intervention. The Lichtenstein procedure maintains its usefulness and represents the most frequent technique for sanctioning inguinal hernia, the non-mesh processes, less used lately, are more frequently preferred in situations where hernia strangulation is associated with a septic complication. Open surgery hernia repair remains a feasible option in the era of minimal invasiveness, especially under the conditions of performing a tension-free technique, for specific categories of patients or surgical services remaining the first intention solution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences
Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
61.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress after the COVID-19 pandemic period among students at the Medical University of Sofia; Significance of demographic, educational, and pandemic-related variables Sarcopenic obesity, pathogenesis, and treatment with a focus on exercise and protein intake Gastric cancer; actualities and perspectives of early diagnosis and targeted therapy Barrett's esophagus as a premalignant condition; medical and surgical therapeutic management Coxarthrosis etiology influences the patients’ quality of life in the preoperative and postoperative phase of total hip arthroplasty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1