马来西亚建筑行业的可持续性披露:社区和媒体合法性的影响

IF 0.4 Q4 MANAGEMENT South East Asian Journal of Management Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.21002/seam.v17i2.1450
Suria Majdi, Norman Mohd Saleh, Maizatulakma Abdullah, Norazlan Alias
{"title":"马来西亚建筑行业的可持续性披露:社区和媒体合法性的影响","authors":"Suria Majdi, Norman Mohd Saleh, Maizatulakma Abdullah, Norazlan Alias","doi":"10.21002/seam.v17i2.1450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Research Aims: The objective of the study is to examine the effects of stakeholder pressure on sustainability disclosure (SD). The study includes the effect of community on SD when the company considers the media as one of the legitimate stakeholders. Design/Methodology/Approach: Stakeholder legitimacy is evaluated using SD via content analysis based on panel data samples from the construction and property sectors. Research Findings: It was found that legitimacy is an antecedent and has a positive relationship with SD. Furthermore, this relationship between community legitimacy and SD is stronger when mediated by media legitimacy. Theoretical Contribution/Originality: This study shows the effects of the legitimacy attribute on SD instead of the influence of stakeholders in general (regardless of the legitimacy concept) and the incremental value for companies to include the interest of the media in SD apart from the communities alone. Managerial Implications in the South East Asian Context: It guides managers in forming a comprehensive stakeholder engagement plan and budget to increase company value. This illustrates to the managers the motivation behind making disclosures about the media in the SD more so in this rapid social media where fake and misleading information threatens the public trust in Southeast Asia. Research Limitations & Implications: The study does not include power and urgency factors along with legitimacy. Keywords: Stakeholder Legitimacy, Stakeholder Salience Theory, Stakeholder Theory, Sustainability Disclosure, Construction, Endogeneity\"","PeriodicalId":41895,"journal":{"name":"South East Asian Journal of Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability Disclosure in The Malaysian Construction Sector: The Effect of Community and Media Legitimacies\",\"authors\":\"Suria Majdi, Norman Mohd Saleh, Maizatulakma Abdullah, Norazlan Alias\",\"doi\":\"10.21002/seam.v17i2.1450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"Research Aims: The objective of the study is to examine the effects of stakeholder pressure on sustainability disclosure (SD). The study includes the effect of community on SD when the company considers the media as one of the legitimate stakeholders. Design/Methodology/Approach: Stakeholder legitimacy is evaluated using SD via content analysis based on panel data samples from the construction and property sectors. Research Findings: It was found that legitimacy is an antecedent and has a positive relationship with SD. Furthermore, this relationship between community legitimacy and SD is stronger when mediated by media legitimacy. Theoretical Contribution/Originality: This study shows the effects of the legitimacy attribute on SD instead of the influence of stakeholders in general (regardless of the legitimacy concept) and the incremental value for companies to include the interest of the media in SD apart from the communities alone. Managerial Implications in the South East Asian Context: It guides managers in forming a comprehensive stakeholder engagement plan and budget to increase company value. This illustrates to the managers the motivation behind making disclosures about the media in the SD more so in this rapid social media where fake and misleading information threatens the public trust in Southeast Asia. Research Limitations & Implications: The study does not include power and urgency factors along with legitimacy. Keywords: Stakeholder Legitimacy, Stakeholder Salience Theory, Stakeholder Theory, Sustainability Disclosure, Construction, Endogeneity\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":41895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South East Asian Journal of Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South East Asian Journal of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21002/seam.v17i2.1450\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South East Asian Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21002/seam.v17i2.1450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:本研究的目的是考察利益相关者压力对可持续发展信息披露(SD)的影响。本研究包括当公司将媒体视为合法利益相关者之一时,社区对公司可持续发展的影响。设计/方法/方法:通过基于建筑和房地产行业面板数据样本的内容分析,使用SD来评估利益相关者的合法性。研究发现:正当性是先行项,并与自我实现感呈正相关。此外,在媒介合法性的中介作用下,社区合法性与可持续发展之间的关系更强。理论贡献/独创性:本研究展示了合法性属性对可持续发展的影响,而不是一般利益相关者的影响(不考虑合法性概念),以及公司将媒体利益纳入可持续发展的增量价值,而不仅仅是社区利益。东南亚背景下的管理影响:它指导管理人员形成全面的利益相关者参与计划和预算,以增加公司价值。这向管理人员说明了披露SD媒体背后的动机,尤其是在这个快速发展的社交媒体中,虚假和误导性的信息威胁着东南亚公众的信任。研究局限&;启示:本研究未包括权力和紧迫性因素以及合法性。关键词:利益相关者合法性,利益相关者突出理论,利益相关者理论,可持续性披露,构建,内生性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sustainability Disclosure in The Malaysian Construction Sector: The Effect of Community and Media Legitimacies
"Research Aims: The objective of the study is to examine the effects of stakeholder pressure on sustainability disclosure (SD). The study includes the effect of community on SD when the company considers the media as one of the legitimate stakeholders. Design/Methodology/Approach: Stakeholder legitimacy is evaluated using SD via content analysis based on panel data samples from the construction and property sectors. Research Findings: It was found that legitimacy is an antecedent and has a positive relationship with SD. Furthermore, this relationship between community legitimacy and SD is stronger when mediated by media legitimacy. Theoretical Contribution/Originality: This study shows the effects of the legitimacy attribute on SD instead of the influence of stakeholders in general (regardless of the legitimacy concept) and the incremental value for companies to include the interest of the media in SD apart from the communities alone. Managerial Implications in the South East Asian Context: It guides managers in forming a comprehensive stakeholder engagement plan and budget to increase company value. This illustrates to the managers the motivation behind making disclosures about the media in the SD more so in this rapid social media where fake and misleading information threatens the public trust in Southeast Asia. Research Limitations & Implications: The study does not include power and urgency factors along with legitimacy. Keywords: Stakeholder Legitimacy, Stakeholder Salience Theory, Stakeholder Theory, Sustainability Disclosure, Construction, Endogeneity"
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Strategic Orientation and Absorptive Capacity: The Mediating Role Of Functional Conflict Unveiling the Dynamics of Expectation, Flow, Enjoyment, and Satisfaction: Drivers of Continued Subscription Intentions Among Netflix Users Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Employees' Creativity with Psychological Empowerment as Mediator Sustainability Disclosure in The Malaysian Construction Sector: The Effect of Community and Media Legitimacies Does Reputation Lead to Student Loyalty? The Case of a Private Higher Education Institution, a State University, and a Local College
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1