内镜入路治疗既往开放手术后复发性腹股沟疝

IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.22543/2392-7674.1402
Doru Moga, Dragos Serban, Bogdan Geavlete, Crenguta Serboiu, Bogdan Serban, Ana Maria Dascalu, Valentin Oprea
{"title":"内镜入路治疗既往开放手术后复发性腹股沟疝","authors":"Doru Moga, Dragos Serban, Bogdan Geavlete, Crenguta Serboiu, Bogdan Serban, Ana Maria Dascalu, Valentin Oprea","doi":"10.22543/2392-7674.1402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The management of a recurrent inguinal hernia varies depending on multiple factors. In the case of recurrent inguinal hernias after open anterior repair, the laparoscopic approach is recommended. TEP and TAPP procedures are considered to have similar results. The purpose of the study is to evaluate on our sample if there are differences between primary inguinal hernia cases and recurrent hernia after laparoscopic TAPP and TEP procedures. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 300 patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs at our hospital from March 2013 to March 2023. Results. Of the 300 patients, 39 of them (13%) had recurrent hernias after open anterior procedures. The mean age of patients with recurrent hernias was 56.82 years, compared to 50.47 years in those with primary hernias. In 27 cases we used the TAPP approach (69%), while in the remaining 12 cases the TEP approach (31%). Operative time for recurrent hernias was 72.69 minutes as opposed to 58.49 minutes for primary hernias. The percentage of peritoneal tears was higher for recurrent hernias (38%) than for primary hernias (18%). Conclusions. Surgery for inguinal hernia recurrence, is often more complex and time-consuming than for a primary hernia. However, postoperative results are favorable, with a low complication rate. Out of the two minimally invasive approach options, TAPP is our choice, especially due to the increased incidence of peritoneal tears.","PeriodicalId":43987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic approach to recurrent inguinal hernia after previous open surgery\",\"authors\":\"Doru Moga, Dragos Serban, Bogdan Geavlete, Crenguta Serboiu, Bogdan Serban, Ana Maria Dascalu, Valentin Oprea\",\"doi\":\"10.22543/2392-7674.1402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. The management of a recurrent inguinal hernia varies depending on multiple factors. In the case of recurrent inguinal hernias after open anterior repair, the laparoscopic approach is recommended. TEP and TAPP procedures are considered to have similar results. The purpose of the study is to evaluate on our sample if there are differences between primary inguinal hernia cases and recurrent hernia after laparoscopic TAPP and TEP procedures. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 300 patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs at our hospital from March 2013 to March 2023. Results. Of the 300 patients, 39 of them (13%) had recurrent hernias after open anterior procedures. The mean age of patients with recurrent hernias was 56.82 years, compared to 50.47 years in those with primary hernias. In 27 cases we used the TAPP approach (69%), while in the remaining 12 cases the TEP approach (31%). Operative time for recurrent hernias was 72.69 minutes as opposed to 58.49 minutes for primary hernias. The percentage of peritoneal tears was higher for recurrent hernias (38%) than for primary hernias (18%). Conclusions. Surgery for inguinal hernia recurrence, is often more complex and time-consuming than for a primary hernia. However, postoperative results are favorable, with a low complication rate. Out of the two minimally invasive approach options, TAPP is our choice, especially due to the increased incidence of peritoneal tears.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22543/2392-7674.1402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22543/2392-7674.1402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。复发性腹股沟疝的处理取决于多种因素。如果腹股沟疝复发后开放前修补,腹腔镜方法是推荐的。TEP和TAPP程序被认为具有相似的结果。本研究的目的是评估我们的样本在腹腔镜TAPP和TEP手术后原发性腹股沟疝和复发性腹股沟疝之间是否存在差异。材料与方法。我们回顾性分析了2013年3月至2023年3月在我院行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的300例患者的医疗记录。结果。在300例患者中,39例(13%)在开放性前路手术后复发疝。复发性疝患者的平均年龄为56.82岁,而原发性疝患者的平均年龄为50.47岁。27例采用TAPP入路(69%),其余12例采用TEP入路(31%)。复发疝的手术时间为72.69分钟,而原发性疝的手术时间为58.49分钟。腹膜撕裂在复发性疝中的比例(38%)高于原发性疝(18%)。结论。腹股沟疝复发的手术通常比原发性疝更复杂和耗时。然而,术后结果良好,并发症发生率低。在两种微创入路选择中,TAPP是我们的选择,特别是由于腹膜撕裂的发生率增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endoscopic approach to recurrent inguinal hernia after previous open surgery
Background. The management of a recurrent inguinal hernia varies depending on multiple factors. In the case of recurrent inguinal hernias after open anterior repair, the laparoscopic approach is recommended. TEP and TAPP procedures are considered to have similar results. The purpose of the study is to evaluate on our sample if there are differences between primary inguinal hernia cases and recurrent hernia after laparoscopic TAPP and TEP procedures. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 300 patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs at our hospital from March 2013 to March 2023. Results. Of the 300 patients, 39 of them (13%) had recurrent hernias after open anterior procedures. The mean age of patients with recurrent hernias was 56.82 years, compared to 50.47 years in those with primary hernias. In 27 cases we used the TAPP approach (69%), while in the remaining 12 cases the TEP approach (31%). Operative time for recurrent hernias was 72.69 minutes as opposed to 58.49 minutes for primary hernias. The percentage of peritoneal tears was higher for recurrent hernias (38%) than for primary hernias (18%). Conclusions. Surgery for inguinal hernia recurrence, is often more complex and time-consuming than for a primary hernia. However, postoperative results are favorable, with a low complication rate. Out of the two minimally invasive approach options, TAPP is our choice, especially due to the increased incidence of peritoneal tears.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences
Journal of Mind and Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
61.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress after the COVID-19 pandemic period among students at the Medical University of Sofia; Significance of demographic, educational, and pandemic-related variables Sarcopenic obesity, pathogenesis, and treatment with a focus on exercise and protein intake Gastric cancer; actualities and perspectives of early diagnosis and targeted therapy Barrett's esophagus as a premalignant condition; medical and surgical therapeutic management Coxarthrosis etiology influences the patients’ quality of life in the preoperative and postoperative phase of total hip arthroplasty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1