初出期成人心理控制不尊重量表的验证:PCDS的心理测量特性和性别测量不变性

IF 1.9 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL International Journal of Adolescence and Youth Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1080/02673843.2023.2276729
Yosi Yaffe
{"title":"初出期成人心理控制不尊重量表的验证:PCDS的心理测量特性和性别测量不变性","authors":"Yosi Yaffe","doi":"10.1080/02673843.2023.2276729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study is the first to describe the validation of the Psychological Control Disrespect Scale (PCDS; Barber etal., 2012) with a large age-range of emerging adults, in an attempt to broaden the usage of the scale to late and post-adolescence population. The sample consisted of 364 participants (184 females and 179 males; 1 unknown sex), whose age ranged between 18 and 29 (M = 24.38, SD = 3.03). Subject to the exclusion of one item, the PCDS exhibited acceptable to good model-fit indices when used with emerging adults reporting on their mothers, and its psychometric properties were found to be principally equal across child’s sex (i.e. respondent’s sex measurement invariance). The PCDS also displayed good reliability indexes, including the first evidence of the scale’s test–retest reliability. Finally, the PCDS was tested for convergent validity against conceptually corresponding parenting scales, which reinforced the scale’s validity as a measure of maladaptive parenting construct.","PeriodicalId":46941,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Adolescence and Youth","volume":"5 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the psychological control disrespect scale with emerging adults: Psychometric properties and sex measurement invariance of the PCDS\",\"authors\":\"Yosi Yaffe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02673843.2023.2276729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study is the first to describe the validation of the Psychological Control Disrespect Scale (PCDS; Barber etal., 2012) with a large age-range of emerging adults, in an attempt to broaden the usage of the scale to late and post-adolescence population. The sample consisted of 364 participants (184 females and 179 males; 1 unknown sex), whose age ranged between 18 and 29 (M = 24.38, SD = 3.03). Subject to the exclusion of one item, the PCDS exhibited acceptable to good model-fit indices when used with emerging adults reporting on their mothers, and its psychometric properties were found to be principally equal across child’s sex (i.e. respondent’s sex measurement invariance). The PCDS also displayed good reliability indexes, including the first evidence of the scale’s test–retest reliability. Finally, the PCDS was tested for convergent validity against conceptually corresponding parenting scales, which reinforced the scale’s validity as a measure of maladaptive parenting construct.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Adolescence and Youth\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Adolescence and Youth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2023.2276729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Adolescence and Youth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2023.2276729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究首次描述了心理控制不尊重量表(PCDS;理发师等等。(2012),研究对象是年龄范围较大的新兴成年人,试图将该量表的使用范围扩大到青春期后期和青春期后人群。样本包括364名参与者(184名女性和179名男性;1名性别不详),年龄18 ~ 29岁(M = 24.38, SD = 3.03)。在排除一个项目的情况下,PCDS在用于报告其母亲的新兴成人时显示出可接受的良好模型拟合指数,并且发现其心理测量特性在儿童性别之间基本相等(即被调查者的性别测量不变性)。PCDS也显示出良好的信度指标,包括量表的重测信度的第一个证据。最后,通过与相应的亲子关系量表的趋同效度检验,进一步验证了该量表作为衡量亲子关系不良结构的效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the psychological control disrespect scale with emerging adults: Psychometric properties and sex measurement invariance of the PCDS
The current study is the first to describe the validation of the Psychological Control Disrespect Scale (PCDS; Barber etal., 2012) with a large age-range of emerging adults, in an attempt to broaden the usage of the scale to late and post-adolescence population. The sample consisted of 364 participants (184 females and 179 males; 1 unknown sex), whose age ranged between 18 and 29 (M = 24.38, SD = 3.03). Subject to the exclusion of one item, the PCDS exhibited acceptable to good model-fit indices when used with emerging adults reporting on their mothers, and its psychometric properties were found to be principally equal across child’s sex (i.e. respondent’s sex measurement invariance). The PCDS also displayed good reliability indexes, including the first evidence of the scale’s test–retest reliability. Finally, the PCDS was tested for convergent validity against conceptually corresponding parenting scales, which reinforced the scale’s validity as a measure of maladaptive parenting construct.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.20%
发文量
32
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: nternational Journal of Adolescence and Youth aims to identify, examine and compare particular issues, problems and policies related to adolescents and youth throughout the world. Subject areas covered include psychological growth and development, health and medical care, delinquency, social policy, employment and unemployment, education and training, spiritual and physical development, leisure, family relationships, sex education, homelessness. The Journal will be of interest to researchers in those areas, university and other higher education institutions, as well as to international, central and local government and voluntary organizations and field work agencies.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the role of smartphone use and demographic factors in predicting nomophobia among university students in Jordan “Oh my God I am alone” : young adult students’ experiences of living alone in a time of global uncertainty “It is not the end of my life”: positive identity (re)constructions among young mothers in rural South-Western Nigeria When conduct achievement does (and does not) make you smile: it depends on your self-construal Trait emotional intelligence and adolescent psychological well-being: a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1