{"title":"医院在流行病管理中的最佳实践:范围审查","authors":"Ali Tahmasebi, Iravan Masoudi asl, Aidin Aryankhesal, Soudabeh Vatankhah, Gholamreza Masoumi","doi":"10.31661/gmj.v12i.2824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Many hospitals globally have valuable experiences in preparing for management and responding to infectious epidemics. Identifying and analyzing these experiences can provide comprehensive and practical data for decision-making and effective performance. This study aimed to conduct a scoping review and content analysis of the best practices of hospital (private or public) management in epidemic conditions.Materials and Methods: This research is a scoping review and content analysis, conducted in 2021. Data was collected by searching different databases, including Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, ProQuest, websites, search engines, and public reports without time limits. Content analysis was performed for data analysis.Results: We retrieved 8842 records from databases and other sources. Finally, 24 studies from 12 countries were selected for analysis. Most studies belonged to the United States (9 cases), and most subjects were on Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) (19 studies). We classified the results into two major categories of in-hospital executive readiness and logistic readiness. Executive readiness included 11 main categories (physical structure, resource management, exposure reduction, patients and caregivers’ management, corpse management, disinfection, staff support, patient admission, instructions and guidelines, tele- communication, and education) and 26 sub-categories. Logistic readiness consisted of three major categories (leadership/team making, communication, and using capabilities) and five sub-categories.Conclusion: Healthcare managers can use the identified categories and dimensions of managerial readiness and responsiveness as an action plan during an infectious disease epidemic.","PeriodicalId":44017,"journal":{"name":"Galen Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best Practices of Hospitals in Management of Epidemic Conditions: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Ali Tahmasebi, Iravan Masoudi asl, Aidin Aryankhesal, Soudabeh Vatankhah, Gholamreza Masoumi\",\"doi\":\"10.31661/gmj.v12i.2824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Many hospitals globally have valuable experiences in preparing for management and responding to infectious epidemics. Identifying and analyzing these experiences can provide comprehensive and practical data for decision-making and effective performance. This study aimed to conduct a scoping review and content analysis of the best practices of hospital (private or public) management in epidemic conditions.Materials and Methods: This research is a scoping review and content analysis, conducted in 2021. Data was collected by searching different databases, including Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, ProQuest, websites, search engines, and public reports without time limits. Content analysis was performed for data analysis.Results: We retrieved 8842 records from databases and other sources. Finally, 24 studies from 12 countries were selected for analysis. Most studies belonged to the United States (9 cases), and most subjects were on Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) (19 studies). We classified the results into two major categories of in-hospital executive readiness and logistic readiness. Executive readiness included 11 main categories (physical structure, resource management, exposure reduction, patients and caregivers’ management, corpse management, disinfection, staff support, patient admission, instructions and guidelines, tele- communication, and education) and 26 sub-categories. Logistic readiness consisted of three major categories (leadership/team making, communication, and using capabilities) and five sub-categories.Conclusion: Healthcare managers can use the identified categories and dimensions of managerial readiness and responsiveness as an action plan during an infectious disease epidemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Galen Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Galen Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v12i.2824\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Galen Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v12i.2824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:全球许多医院在准备管理和应对传染病方面具有宝贵的经验。识别和分析这些经验可以为决策和有效绩效提供全面和实用的数据。本研究旨在对流行病条件下医院(私立或公立)管理的最佳做法进行范围审查和内容分析。材料和方法:本研究是一项范围审查和内容分析,于2021年进行。通过检索不同的数据库收集数据,包括Pubmed、Scopus、Web of Sciences、ProQuest、网站、搜索引擎和公开报告,没有时间限制。对数据进行内容分析。结果:我们从数据库和其他来源检索到8842条记录。最后,我们选择了来自12个国家的24项研究进行分析。大多数研究来自美国(9例),大多数研究对象是2019冠状病毒病(Covid-19)(19项研究)。我们将结果分为院内执行准备和后勤准备两大类。执行准备包括11个主要类别(物理结构、资源管理、减少接触、患者和护理人员管理、尸体管理、消毒、工作人员支持、患者入院、指示和指南、远程通信和教育)和26个子类别。后勤准备包括三个主要类别(领导/团队组建、沟通和使用能力)和五个子类别。结论:在传染病流行期间,医疗保健管理人员可以使用确定的管理准备和响应的类别和维度作为行动计划。
Best Practices of Hospitals in Management of Epidemic Conditions: A Scoping Review
Background: Many hospitals globally have valuable experiences in preparing for management and responding to infectious epidemics. Identifying and analyzing these experiences can provide comprehensive and practical data for decision-making and effective performance. This study aimed to conduct a scoping review and content analysis of the best practices of hospital (private or public) management in epidemic conditions.Materials and Methods: This research is a scoping review and content analysis, conducted in 2021. Data was collected by searching different databases, including Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, ProQuest, websites, search engines, and public reports without time limits. Content analysis was performed for data analysis.Results: We retrieved 8842 records from databases and other sources. Finally, 24 studies from 12 countries were selected for analysis. Most studies belonged to the United States (9 cases), and most subjects were on Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) (19 studies). We classified the results into two major categories of in-hospital executive readiness and logistic readiness. Executive readiness included 11 main categories (physical structure, resource management, exposure reduction, patients and caregivers’ management, corpse management, disinfection, staff support, patient admission, instructions and guidelines, tele- communication, and education) and 26 sub-categories. Logistic readiness consisted of three major categories (leadership/team making, communication, and using capabilities) and five sub-categories.Conclusion: Healthcare managers can use the identified categories and dimensions of managerial readiness and responsiveness as an action plan during an infectious disease epidemic.
期刊介绍:
GMJ is open access, peer-reviewed journal in English and supported by Noncommunicable Diseases (NCD) Research Center of Fasa University of Medical Sciences that publishing by Salvia Medical Sciences Ltd. GMJ will consider all types of the following scientific papers for publication: - Editorial’s choice - Original Researches - Review articles - Case reports - Case series - Letter (to editors, to authors, etc) - Short communications - Medical Idea