英国为痴呆症患者提供额外护理住房的优势和挑战:范围审查

IF 0.8 Q3 URBAN STUDIES Housing Care and Support Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1108/hcs-09-2022-0023
Teresa June Atkinson, Rebecca Oatley, Simon Evans
{"title":"英国为痴呆症患者提供额外护理住房的优势和挑战:范围审查","authors":"Teresa June Atkinson, Rebecca Oatley, Simon Evans","doi":"10.1108/hcs-09-2022-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this paper is to report on a scoping review of the advantages and challenges of extra care housing (ECH) provision in the UK for people living with dementia. Access to suitable housing is a fundamental right for people living with dementia and can enable people to live as well as possible (Twyford and Porteus, 2021). Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of different models of housing with care has been identified as a research priority by people living with dementia (Barrett et al., 2016) but “there is no current consensus on the best model of specialist housing for people with dementia” (Twyford and Porteus, 2021, p. 29). Design/methodology/approach This scoping review identifies the advantages and disadvantages of living in ECH for people with dementia. It is the preliminary stage of a study that seeks to develop knowledge about different models of ECH for people living with dementia (Atkinson et al., 2021). Findings Advantages include the promotion of independence, flexible staffing, safety and security, social inclusion, physical design and integrated service provision. Disadvantages include barriers to entry, tensions between independence and support, managing advanced dementia, resourcing flexible care, managing social exclusion, loneliness and stigma and a disabling environment. Research limitations/implications The scoping review reinforces the need for further research into different models of ECH provision in the UK for people living with dementia. The review provides insight that is of benefit to all stakeholders involved in ECH and contributes to the development of evidence-based provision called for in the recent All Party Parliamentary Group inquiry (Twyford and Porteus, 2021). Originality/value This scoping review summarises the current position for people living with dementia in ECH.","PeriodicalId":43302,"journal":{"name":"Housing Care and Support","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advantages and challenges of extra care housing in the UK for people living with dementia: a scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Teresa June Atkinson, Rebecca Oatley, Simon Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/hcs-09-2022-0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose The purpose of this paper is to report on a scoping review of the advantages and challenges of extra care housing (ECH) provision in the UK for people living with dementia. Access to suitable housing is a fundamental right for people living with dementia and can enable people to live as well as possible (Twyford and Porteus, 2021). Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of different models of housing with care has been identified as a research priority by people living with dementia (Barrett et al., 2016) but “there is no current consensus on the best model of specialist housing for people with dementia” (Twyford and Porteus, 2021, p. 29). Design/methodology/approach This scoping review identifies the advantages and disadvantages of living in ECH for people with dementia. It is the preliminary stage of a study that seeks to develop knowledge about different models of ECH for people living with dementia (Atkinson et al., 2021). Findings Advantages include the promotion of independence, flexible staffing, safety and security, social inclusion, physical design and integrated service provision. Disadvantages include barriers to entry, tensions between independence and support, managing advanced dementia, resourcing flexible care, managing social exclusion, loneliness and stigma and a disabling environment. Research limitations/implications The scoping review reinforces the need for further research into different models of ECH provision in the UK for people living with dementia. The review provides insight that is of benefit to all stakeholders involved in ECH and contributes to the development of evidence-based provision called for in the recent All Party Parliamentary Group inquiry (Twyford and Porteus, 2021). Originality/value This scoping review summarises the current position for people living with dementia in ECH.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Housing Care and Support\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Housing Care and Support\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/hcs-09-2022-0023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Care and Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/hcs-09-2022-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的这篇论文的目的是报告一个范围审查的优势和挑战额外护理住房(ECH)提供在英国为痴呆症患者。获得合适的住房是痴呆症患者的一项基本权利,可以使他们尽可能地生活(Twyford和Porteus, 2021)。了解不同护理住房模式的优缺点已被痴呆症患者确定为研究重点(Barrett等人,2016年),但“目前对于痴呆症患者的最佳专业住房模式尚无共识”(Twyford和Porteus, 2021年,第29页)。设计/方法/方法本综述确定了痴呆症患者在ECH生活的优点和缺点。这是一项研究的初步阶段,该研究旨在了解痴呆症患者的不同ECH模型(Atkinson et al., 2021)。优势包括促进独立性、灵活人员配置、安全保障、社会包容、物理设计和综合服务提供。不利因素包括进入障碍、独立与支持之间的紧张关系、管理晚期痴呆症、提供灵活护理资源、管理社会排斥、孤独和耻辱以及致残环境。研究局限性/意义范围审查强调了进一步研究英国为痴呆症患者提供ECH的不同模式的必要性。该审查提供了对参与ECH的所有利益相关者有益的见解,并有助于最近全党议会小组调查(Twyford和Porteus, 2021年)所要求的循证条款的发展。原创性/价值本范围综述总结了ECH中痴呆患者的现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Advantages and challenges of extra care housing in the UK for people living with dementia: a scoping review
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to report on a scoping review of the advantages and challenges of extra care housing (ECH) provision in the UK for people living with dementia. Access to suitable housing is a fundamental right for people living with dementia and can enable people to live as well as possible (Twyford and Porteus, 2021). Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of different models of housing with care has been identified as a research priority by people living with dementia (Barrett et al., 2016) but “there is no current consensus on the best model of specialist housing for people with dementia” (Twyford and Porteus, 2021, p. 29). Design/methodology/approach This scoping review identifies the advantages and disadvantages of living in ECH for people with dementia. It is the preliminary stage of a study that seeks to develop knowledge about different models of ECH for people living with dementia (Atkinson et al., 2021). Findings Advantages include the promotion of independence, flexible staffing, safety and security, social inclusion, physical design and integrated service provision. Disadvantages include barriers to entry, tensions between independence and support, managing advanced dementia, resourcing flexible care, managing social exclusion, loneliness and stigma and a disabling environment. Research limitations/implications The scoping review reinforces the need for further research into different models of ECH provision in the UK for people living with dementia. The review provides insight that is of benefit to all stakeholders involved in ECH and contributes to the development of evidence-based provision called for in the recent All Party Parliamentary Group inquiry (Twyford and Porteus, 2021). Originality/value This scoping review summarises the current position for people living with dementia in ECH.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Housing Care and Support
Housing Care and Support URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Social housing development: a case study in Bac Ninh province, Vietnam Reviewing the affordability and adequacy of affordable housing in urban India: Impact of the covid-19 pandemic Filling in the gaps: examining the prevalence of Black homelessness in Canada Advantages and challenges of extra care housing in the UK for people living with dementia: a scoping review Choosing invisibility? Exploring service (dis)engagement of women experiencing multiple disadvantage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1