改进的基于分数阶的未来搜索算法,用于增强基于pemfc的CCHP的性能

Biao Lu, Navid Razmjooy
{"title":"改进的基于分数阶的未来搜索算法,用于增强基于pemfc的CCHP的性能","authors":"Biao Lu, Navid Razmjooy","doi":"10.1080/15567036.2023.2276385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTLoad control and cost optimization are considered to be crucial in tri-generation or combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) systems. In this study, an inventive CCHP system employs an FC system as its first mover and includes a heat exchanger, a heat recovery, as well as an auxiliary boiler, an electric chiller, and an absorption chiller. The electrical grid is linked to this system. The idea here is to maximize the system’s performance from a financial perspective and to make the annual expenditure of the system minimum over a 20–year period that is considered as the cycle life-span. It is a multi-objective optimization problem which is optimized using a newly introduced metaheuristic optimization method and a Fractional-order future search optimizer. The findings of this study are used to divine an ideal configuration of the CCHP. Finally, to demonstrate the higher efficiency of the suggested method, a comparison should be conducted among the optimization results of the fractional-order-based future search algorithm, the results of Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), and standard future search algorithms in previous studies. Based on the results presented, the proposed Fractional-order Future Search Algorithm (FOFSA) was able to optimize the performance of a PEMFC-based CCHP system more effectively than conventional methods. The system’s exergy efficiency was found to decrease from 52% at 793 mA/cm2 current density to 36% at 1000 mA/cm2 current density. However, with the application of FOFSA, the suggested optimal system had a higher exergy efficiency of 41.6% and a yearly cost of $2765, resulting in the maximum annual greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction of 4.48E6 g. Therefore, in summary, the proposed FOFSA yielded an optimized CCHP system configuration that had higher energy efficiency, lower annual cost, and reduced GHG emissions. These findings highlight the effectiveness of the FOFSA method in optimizing the performance of PEMFC-based CCHP systems.KEYWORDS: Combined heatingcoolingand power cycle; proton exchange membranefuel cell; economic performanceannual cost; fractional-order future search algorithm Nomenclature Symbol=ExplanationCCHP=Combined cooling, heating, and powerNSGA-II=Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm IIFOFSA=Fractional-order Future Search AlgorithmGHG=Greenhouse gasIMPO=Improved marine predators optimizerPROX=Preferential oxidationPCM=Phase change materialDAC=Desiccant air conditioningHX=Heat-exchangerMEA=Membrane-electrode assemblyNs=The connected cells’ quantityEN=The open-circuit Nernst relation (V)Vloss=The overall voltage loss (V)Vcon=Concentration loss (V)Vact=Activation loss (V)VΩ=Ohmic loss (V)EN=The stack output voltage (V)E0=The open-circuit voltage of the cell (V)F=The Faraday’s constant (C/mol)R=The universal gas constant (J/mol.K)T=The operating temperaturePO2=The partial pressure of O2 (Pa)PH2=The partial pressure of H2 (Pa)PH2Oc=The partial pressure of steam (Pa)Rhc=The vapor relative humidity in cathodeRha=The vapor relative humidity in anodeI=The FC’s current operating (A)A=The FC’s membrane active area (m2)PC=The inlet partial pressure in electrodes for cathode (Pc)PA=The inlet partial pressure in electrodes for anode (Pa)Rc=The resistance of connections (kΩ)Rm=The resistance of membrane (kΩ)ρm=The resistivity of the membrane (Ω.m)l=The thickness of the membrane (m)λ=A changeable variableI=The current of fuel cell stack (A)I0=The limiting current (A)n=The charge transfer coefficientbm=The mass transfer voltage (V)ηex=The system’s exergy efficiencyPCCHP=The produced electric energy in the systemExe=The provided cooling exergyExhw=The provided hot water exergyExCCHP=The consumed fuel exergy in the systemSH2=The H2 stoichiometryRH2=The molar rate of fuel consumption (mol.s−1)ExH2=The exergy of the standard chemical for 1 mol hydrogen Tc=The temperature of chiller’s cooling waterT0=The surrounding temperature Thw=The temperature of hot waterCostinv=The CCHP system’s original investment costCostf=Overall fuel costCostmt=Maintenance costCostf=Total fuel cost of the proposed systemMcH2=hydrogen’s molar capacity (kg/mol)CostH2=The hydrogen generation unit cost ($/kg)Trt=The overall functioning duration of the system (year)Coav=The CCHP system’s average yearly costPER=Pollution-related emission reductionEmst=The station’s air pollutant emissionsEmGHG=The formed greenhouse gas emissions during the production of energyEeq=In the two systems, all of the energy kinds were translated into equal electric powerEhw=The heated water’s transformed electricityEFC=The electricity of the fuel cellEc=The altered cooling volumeCOPtc=The electric air-conditioningCOPWH=Co-efficient performance of Water heaterEmred=The yearly reduction in green-house gas emissionEmH2=The annual green-house gas emissions from H2 generationEGHG=The greenhouse gas emissions created by the wind-based H2 generation systemHVH2=The heat value of the system’s annual hydrogen consumptionDisclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsBiao LuBiao Lu obtained a master's degree in computer science and a master's degree in computer application from Nanjing University of Posts and telecommunications in Nanjing, China. She is a professor and her main research interests are artificial intelligence and software engineering Dr. Navid Razmjooy is a Postdoc researcher at the industrial college of the Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi. He is also a part-time assistant professor at the Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran. His main areas of research are the Renewable Energies, Machine Vision, Soft Computing, Data Mining, Evolutionary Algorithms, Interval Analysis, and System Control.Navid RazmjooyNavid Razmjooy studied his Ph.D. in the field of Electrical Engineering (Control and Automation) from Tafresh University, Iran (2018). He is a senior member of IEEE/USA and YRC in IAU/Iran. He has been ranked among the world's top 2% scientists in the world based on the Stanford University/Scopus database. He published more than 200 papers and 6 books in English and Persian in peer-reviewed journals and conferences and is now Editor and reviewer in several national and international journals and conferences.","PeriodicalId":11580,"journal":{"name":"Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A modified fractional‑order-based future search algorithm for performance enhancement of a PEMFC-based CCHP\",\"authors\":\"Biao Lu, Navid Razmjooy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15567036.2023.2276385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTLoad control and cost optimization are considered to be crucial in tri-generation or combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) systems. In this study, an inventive CCHP system employs an FC system as its first mover and includes a heat exchanger, a heat recovery, as well as an auxiliary boiler, an electric chiller, and an absorption chiller. The electrical grid is linked to this system. The idea here is to maximize the system’s performance from a financial perspective and to make the annual expenditure of the system minimum over a 20–year period that is considered as the cycle life-span. It is a multi-objective optimization problem which is optimized using a newly introduced metaheuristic optimization method and a Fractional-order future search optimizer. The findings of this study are used to divine an ideal configuration of the CCHP. Finally, to demonstrate the higher efficiency of the suggested method, a comparison should be conducted among the optimization results of the fractional-order-based future search algorithm, the results of Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), and standard future search algorithms in previous studies. Based on the results presented, the proposed Fractional-order Future Search Algorithm (FOFSA) was able to optimize the performance of a PEMFC-based CCHP system more effectively than conventional methods. The system’s exergy efficiency was found to decrease from 52% at 793 mA/cm2 current density to 36% at 1000 mA/cm2 current density. However, with the application of FOFSA, the suggested optimal system had a higher exergy efficiency of 41.6% and a yearly cost of $2765, resulting in the maximum annual greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction of 4.48E6 g. Therefore, in summary, the proposed FOFSA yielded an optimized CCHP system configuration that had higher energy efficiency, lower annual cost, and reduced GHG emissions. These findings highlight the effectiveness of the FOFSA method in optimizing the performance of PEMFC-based CCHP systems.KEYWORDS: Combined heatingcoolingand power cycle; proton exchange membranefuel cell; economic performanceannual cost; fractional-order future search algorithm Nomenclature Symbol=ExplanationCCHP=Combined cooling, heating, and powerNSGA-II=Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm IIFOFSA=Fractional-order Future Search AlgorithmGHG=Greenhouse gasIMPO=Improved marine predators optimizerPROX=Preferential oxidationPCM=Phase change materialDAC=Desiccant air conditioningHX=Heat-exchangerMEA=Membrane-electrode assemblyNs=The connected cells’ quantityEN=The open-circuit Nernst relation (V)Vloss=The overall voltage loss (V)Vcon=Concentration loss (V)Vact=Activation loss (V)VΩ=Ohmic loss (V)EN=The stack output voltage (V)E0=The open-circuit voltage of the cell (V)F=The Faraday’s constant (C/mol)R=The universal gas constant (J/mol.K)T=The operating temperaturePO2=The partial pressure of O2 (Pa)PH2=The partial pressure of H2 (Pa)PH2Oc=The partial pressure of steam (Pa)Rhc=The vapor relative humidity in cathodeRha=The vapor relative humidity in anodeI=The FC’s current operating (A)A=The FC’s membrane active area (m2)PC=The inlet partial pressure in electrodes for cathode (Pc)PA=The inlet partial pressure in electrodes for anode (Pa)Rc=The resistance of connections (kΩ)Rm=The resistance of membrane (kΩ)ρm=The resistivity of the membrane (Ω.m)l=The thickness of the membrane (m)λ=A changeable variableI=The current of fuel cell stack (A)I0=The limiting current (A)n=The charge transfer coefficientbm=The mass transfer voltage (V)ηex=The system’s exergy efficiencyPCCHP=The produced electric energy in the systemExe=The provided cooling exergyExhw=The provided hot water exergyExCCHP=The consumed fuel exergy in the systemSH2=The H2 stoichiometryRH2=The molar rate of fuel consumption (mol.s−1)ExH2=The exergy of the standard chemical for 1 mol hydrogen Tc=The temperature of chiller’s cooling waterT0=The surrounding temperature Thw=The temperature of hot waterCostinv=The CCHP system’s original investment costCostf=Overall fuel costCostmt=Maintenance costCostf=Total fuel cost of the proposed systemMcH2=hydrogen’s molar capacity (kg/mol)CostH2=The hydrogen generation unit cost ($/kg)Trt=The overall functioning duration of the system (year)Coav=The CCHP system’s average yearly costPER=Pollution-related emission reductionEmst=The station’s air pollutant emissionsEmGHG=The formed greenhouse gas emissions during the production of energyEeq=In the two systems, all of the energy kinds were translated into equal electric powerEhw=The heated water’s transformed electricityEFC=The electricity of the fuel cellEc=The altered cooling volumeCOPtc=The electric air-conditioningCOPWH=Co-efficient performance of Water heaterEmred=The yearly reduction in green-house gas emissionEmH2=The annual green-house gas emissions from H2 generationEGHG=The greenhouse gas emissions created by the wind-based H2 generation systemHVH2=The heat value of the system’s annual hydrogen consumptionDisclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsBiao LuBiao Lu obtained a master's degree in computer science and a master's degree in computer application from Nanjing University of Posts and telecommunications in Nanjing, China. She is a professor and her main research interests are artificial intelligence and software engineering Dr. Navid Razmjooy is a Postdoc researcher at the industrial college of the Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi. He is also a part-time assistant professor at the Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran. His main areas of research are the Renewable Energies, Machine Vision, Soft Computing, Data Mining, Evolutionary Algorithms, Interval Analysis, and System Control.Navid RazmjooyNavid Razmjooy studied his Ph.D. in the field of Electrical Engineering (Control and Automation) from Tafresh University, Iran (2018). He is a senior member of IEEE/USA and YRC in IAU/Iran. He has been ranked among the world's top 2% scientists in the world based on the Stanford University/Scopus database. He published more than 200 papers and 6 books in English and Persian in peer-reviewed journals and conferences and is now Editor and reviewer in several national and international journals and conferences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2023.2276385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2023.2276385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要负荷控制和成本优化被认为是三电或冷热电联产(CCHP)系统的关键。在本研究中,一种创新的热电联产系统采用FC系统作为原动机,包括热交换器、热回收、辅助锅炉、电冷冻机和吸收式冷冻机。电网与这个系统相连。这里的想法是从财务角度最大化系统的性能,并使系统的年度支出在20年的周期内达到最低,这被认为是循环寿命。它是一个多目标优化问题,采用新引入的元启发式优化方法和分数阶未来搜索优化器进行优化。本研究的结果用于预测CCHP的理想配置。最后,将基于分数阶的未来搜索算法的优化结果与非支配排序遗传算法II (non - dominant Sorting Genetic algorithm II, NSGA-II)的优化结果与前人研究的标准未来搜索算法的优化结果进行比较,以证明所提方法的更高效率。基于上述结果,所提出的分数阶未来搜索算法(FOFSA)能够比传统方法更有效地优化基于pemfc的CCHP系统的性能。系统的火用效率从793 mA/cm2电流密度时的52%下降到1000 mA/cm2电流密度时的36%。然而,应用FOFSA后,建议的最优系统的火用效率更高,达到41.6%,年成本为2765美元,最大年温室气体(GHG)减少4.48E6 g。综上所述,所提出的FOFSA产生了一个优化的CCHP系统配置,具有更高的能源效率,更低的年成本,并减少了温室气体排放。这些发现突出了FOFSA方法在优化基于pemfc的CCHP系统性能方面的有效性。关键词:热冷联产;质子交换膜燃料电池;经济效益年成本;分数阶未来搜索算法名称符号=解释cchp =联合冷却、加热、nsga - ii =非支配排序遗传算法IIFOFSA=分数阶未来搜索算法ghg =温室气体impo =改进的海洋捕食者optimizerPROX=优先氧化pcm =相变材料dac =干湿空调hx =热交换器mea =膜电极组装ns =连接细胞的数量EN=开路能量关系(V)Vloss=总电压损耗(V)Vcon=浓度损耗(V)Vact=激活损耗(V)VΩ=欧姆损耗(V)EN=堆叠输出电压(V)E0=电池开路电压(V)F=法拉第常数(C/mol)R=通用气体常数(J/mol. k)T=工作温度po2 = O2分压(Pa)PH2= H2分压(Pa)PH2Oc=蒸汽分压(Pa)Rhc=阴极中的蒸气相对湿度ha=阳极中的蒸气相对湿度i = FC的工作电流(A)A= FC的膜活性面积(m2)PC=阴极电极的入口分压(PC) Pa =阴极的入口分压阳极电极(Pa)Rc=连接电阻(kΩ)Rm=膜电阻(kΩ)ρm=膜电阻率(Ω.m)l=膜厚度(m)λ=可变变量lei =燃料电池堆电流(A)I0=极限电流(A)n=电荷传递系数bm=传质电压(V)ηex=系统的火用效率ypcchp =系统中产生的电能exe =提供的冷却火用exhw =提供的热水火用excchp =消耗的燃料火用sh2 = H2的化学计量;rh2 =燃料消耗的摩尔速率(mol。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A modified fractional‑order-based future search algorithm for performance enhancement of a PEMFC-based CCHP
ABSTRACTLoad control and cost optimization are considered to be crucial in tri-generation or combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) systems. In this study, an inventive CCHP system employs an FC system as its first mover and includes a heat exchanger, a heat recovery, as well as an auxiliary boiler, an electric chiller, and an absorption chiller. The electrical grid is linked to this system. The idea here is to maximize the system’s performance from a financial perspective and to make the annual expenditure of the system minimum over a 20–year period that is considered as the cycle life-span. It is a multi-objective optimization problem which is optimized using a newly introduced metaheuristic optimization method and a Fractional-order future search optimizer. The findings of this study are used to divine an ideal configuration of the CCHP. Finally, to demonstrate the higher efficiency of the suggested method, a comparison should be conducted among the optimization results of the fractional-order-based future search algorithm, the results of Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), and standard future search algorithms in previous studies. Based on the results presented, the proposed Fractional-order Future Search Algorithm (FOFSA) was able to optimize the performance of a PEMFC-based CCHP system more effectively than conventional methods. The system’s exergy efficiency was found to decrease from 52% at 793 mA/cm2 current density to 36% at 1000 mA/cm2 current density. However, with the application of FOFSA, the suggested optimal system had a higher exergy efficiency of 41.6% and a yearly cost of $2765, resulting in the maximum annual greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction of 4.48E6 g. Therefore, in summary, the proposed FOFSA yielded an optimized CCHP system configuration that had higher energy efficiency, lower annual cost, and reduced GHG emissions. These findings highlight the effectiveness of the FOFSA method in optimizing the performance of PEMFC-based CCHP systems.KEYWORDS: Combined heatingcoolingand power cycle; proton exchange membranefuel cell; economic performanceannual cost; fractional-order future search algorithm Nomenclature Symbol=ExplanationCCHP=Combined cooling, heating, and powerNSGA-II=Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm IIFOFSA=Fractional-order Future Search AlgorithmGHG=Greenhouse gasIMPO=Improved marine predators optimizerPROX=Preferential oxidationPCM=Phase change materialDAC=Desiccant air conditioningHX=Heat-exchangerMEA=Membrane-electrode assemblyNs=The connected cells’ quantityEN=The open-circuit Nernst relation (V)Vloss=The overall voltage loss (V)Vcon=Concentration loss (V)Vact=Activation loss (V)VΩ=Ohmic loss (V)EN=The stack output voltage (V)E0=The open-circuit voltage of the cell (V)F=The Faraday’s constant (C/mol)R=The universal gas constant (J/mol.K)T=The operating temperaturePO2=The partial pressure of O2 (Pa)PH2=The partial pressure of H2 (Pa)PH2Oc=The partial pressure of steam (Pa)Rhc=The vapor relative humidity in cathodeRha=The vapor relative humidity in anodeI=The FC’s current operating (A)A=The FC’s membrane active area (m2)PC=The inlet partial pressure in electrodes for cathode (Pc)PA=The inlet partial pressure in electrodes for anode (Pa)Rc=The resistance of connections (kΩ)Rm=The resistance of membrane (kΩ)ρm=The resistivity of the membrane (Ω.m)l=The thickness of the membrane (m)λ=A changeable variableI=The current of fuel cell stack (A)I0=The limiting current (A)n=The charge transfer coefficientbm=The mass transfer voltage (V)ηex=The system’s exergy efficiencyPCCHP=The produced electric energy in the systemExe=The provided cooling exergyExhw=The provided hot water exergyExCCHP=The consumed fuel exergy in the systemSH2=The H2 stoichiometryRH2=The molar rate of fuel consumption (mol.s−1)ExH2=The exergy of the standard chemical for 1 mol hydrogen Tc=The temperature of chiller’s cooling waterT0=The surrounding temperature Thw=The temperature of hot waterCostinv=The CCHP system’s original investment costCostf=Overall fuel costCostmt=Maintenance costCostf=Total fuel cost of the proposed systemMcH2=hydrogen’s molar capacity (kg/mol)CostH2=The hydrogen generation unit cost ($/kg)Trt=The overall functioning duration of the system (year)Coav=The CCHP system’s average yearly costPER=Pollution-related emission reductionEmst=The station’s air pollutant emissionsEmGHG=The formed greenhouse gas emissions during the production of energyEeq=In the two systems, all of the energy kinds were translated into equal electric powerEhw=The heated water’s transformed electricityEFC=The electricity of the fuel cellEc=The altered cooling volumeCOPtc=The electric air-conditioningCOPWH=Co-efficient performance of Water heaterEmred=The yearly reduction in green-house gas emissionEmH2=The annual green-house gas emissions from H2 generationEGHG=The greenhouse gas emissions created by the wind-based H2 generation systemHVH2=The heat value of the system’s annual hydrogen consumptionDisclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsBiao LuBiao Lu obtained a master's degree in computer science and a master's degree in computer application from Nanjing University of Posts and telecommunications in Nanjing, China. She is a professor and her main research interests are artificial intelligence and software engineering Dr. Navid Razmjooy is a Postdoc researcher at the industrial college of the Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi. He is also a part-time assistant professor at the Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran. His main areas of research are the Renewable Energies, Machine Vision, Soft Computing, Data Mining, Evolutionary Algorithms, Interval Analysis, and System Control.Navid RazmjooyNavid Razmjooy studied his Ph.D. in the field of Electrical Engineering (Control and Automation) from Tafresh University, Iran (2018). He is a senior member of IEEE/USA and YRC in IAU/Iran. He has been ranked among the world's top 2% scientists in the world based on the Stanford University/Scopus database. He published more than 200 papers and 6 books in English and Persian in peer-reviewed journals and conferences and is now Editor and reviewer in several national and international journals and conferences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A techno-assessment approach on biogas yield from organic agriculture wastes of cauliflower and grape residues Analyzing market plans for enhanced energy hub efficiency: strategies for integrating multiple energy sources and collaboration Experimental study on the characteristics of thermal runaway propagation process of cylindrical lithium-ion batteries Utilizing biomass-derived activated carbon hybrids for enhanced thermal conductivity and latent heat storage in form-stabilized composite PCMs Post-outburst coal pulverization: Experimental insights with representative accident samples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1