Craig N. Robson , Andrew Hall , Adrian L. Harris , Ian D. Hickson
{"title":"博来霉素和x射线过敏的中国仓鼠卵巢细胞突变体:遗传分析和对新羧抑素的交叉抗性","authors":"Craig N. Robson , Andrew Hall , Adrian L. Harris , Ian D. Hickson","doi":"10.1016/0167-8817(88)90046-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We have previously reported the isolation of 3 mutants of Chinese hamster ovary cells which exhibit hypersensitivity to bleomycin. 2 mutants were isolated on the basis of bleomycin-sensitivity [designated BLM-1 and BLM-2, Robson et al., Cancer Res., 45 (1985) 5304–5309] and 1 as adriamycin-sensitive [ADR-1, Robson et al., Cancer Res., 47 (1987) 1560–1565]. Because bleomycin generates DNA-strand breaks via a free-radical mechanism, we have studied the survival response of these mutants to a range of drugs which also generate free radicals and consequently DNA-strand breaks. The mutants are all hypersensitive to phleomycin, which differs from bleomycin in being unable to intercalate due to a modified bithiazole moiety. However, BLM-2 cells alone are hypersensitive to pepleomycin, a semi-synthetic bleomycin analogue. In contrast, BLM-1 cells are more sensitive than BLM-2 to streptonigrin (which operates via a hydroquinone intermediate). ADR-1 cells show wild-type resistance to streptonigrin. The results obtained with neocarzinostatin, an antibiotic requiring thiol activation, are unusual in that both BLM-1 and BLM-2 are approximately 3-fold more resistant than parental cells. However, the steady-state intracellular level of the major non-protein thiol, glutathione, is not altered in BLM-1 or BLM-2 cells. ADR-1 cells show essentially wild-type resistance to neocarzinostatin.</p><p>Analysis of cell hybrids shows that BLM-1 and BLM-2 cells are phenotypically recessive in combination with parental CHO-K1 cells and represent different genetic complementation groups not only from one another, but also from the bleomycin-sensitive mutant xrs-6, isolated on the basis of X-ray sensitivity by Jeggo and Kemp [Mutation Res., 112 (1983) 313–319]. These results indicate that at least 3 gene products are involved in cellular protection against bleomycin toxicity in mammalian cells.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100936,"journal":{"name":"Mutation Research/DNA Repair Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0167-8817(88)90046-6","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bleomycin and X-ray-hypersensitive Chinese hamster ovary cell mutants: Genetic analysis and cross-resistance to neocarzinostatin\",\"authors\":\"Craig N. Robson , Andrew Hall , Adrian L. Harris , Ian D. Hickson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0167-8817(88)90046-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We have previously reported the isolation of 3 mutants of Chinese hamster ovary cells which exhibit hypersensitivity to bleomycin. 2 mutants were isolated on the basis of bleomycin-sensitivity [designated BLM-1 and BLM-2, Robson et al., Cancer Res., 45 (1985) 5304–5309] and 1 as adriamycin-sensitive [ADR-1, Robson et al., Cancer Res., 47 (1987) 1560–1565]. Because bleomycin generates DNA-strand breaks via a free-radical mechanism, we have studied the survival response of these mutants to a range of drugs which also generate free radicals and consequently DNA-strand breaks. The mutants are all hypersensitive to phleomycin, which differs from bleomycin in being unable to intercalate due to a modified bithiazole moiety. However, BLM-2 cells alone are hypersensitive to pepleomycin, a semi-synthetic bleomycin analogue. In contrast, BLM-1 cells are more sensitive than BLM-2 to streptonigrin (which operates via a hydroquinone intermediate). ADR-1 cells show wild-type resistance to streptonigrin. The results obtained with neocarzinostatin, an antibiotic requiring thiol activation, are unusual in that both BLM-1 and BLM-2 are approximately 3-fold more resistant than parental cells. However, the steady-state intracellular level of the major non-protein thiol, glutathione, is not altered in BLM-1 or BLM-2 cells. ADR-1 cells show essentially wild-type resistance to neocarzinostatin.</p><p>Analysis of cell hybrids shows that BLM-1 and BLM-2 cells are phenotypically recessive in combination with parental CHO-K1 cells and represent different genetic complementation groups not only from one another, but also from the bleomycin-sensitive mutant xrs-6, isolated on the basis of X-ray sensitivity by Jeggo and Kemp [Mutation Res., 112 (1983) 313–319]. These results indicate that at least 3 gene products are involved in cellular protection against bleomycin toxicity in mammalian cells.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mutation Research/DNA Repair Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0167-8817(88)90046-6\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mutation Research/DNA Repair Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167881788900466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation Research/DNA Repair Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167881788900466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bleomycin and X-ray-hypersensitive Chinese hamster ovary cell mutants: Genetic analysis and cross-resistance to neocarzinostatin
We have previously reported the isolation of 3 mutants of Chinese hamster ovary cells which exhibit hypersensitivity to bleomycin. 2 mutants were isolated on the basis of bleomycin-sensitivity [designated BLM-1 and BLM-2, Robson et al., Cancer Res., 45 (1985) 5304–5309] and 1 as adriamycin-sensitive [ADR-1, Robson et al., Cancer Res., 47 (1987) 1560–1565]. Because bleomycin generates DNA-strand breaks via a free-radical mechanism, we have studied the survival response of these mutants to a range of drugs which also generate free radicals and consequently DNA-strand breaks. The mutants are all hypersensitive to phleomycin, which differs from bleomycin in being unable to intercalate due to a modified bithiazole moiety. However, BLM-2 cells alone are hypersensitive to pepleomycin, a semi-synthetic bleomycin analogue. In contrast, BLM-1 cells are more sensitive than BLM-2 to streptonigrin (which operates via a hydroquinone intermediate). ADR-1 cells show wild-type resistance to streptonigrin. The results obtained with neocarzinostatin, an antibiotic requiring thiol activation, are unusual in that both BLM-1 and BLM-2 are approximately 3-fold more resistant than parental cells. However, the steady-state intracellular level of the major non-protein thiol, glutathione, is not altered in BLM-1 or BLM-2 cells. ADR-1 cells show essentially wild-type resistance to neocarzinostatin.
Analysis of cell hybrids shows that BLM-1 and BLM-2 cells are phenotypically recessive in combination with parental CHO-K1 cells and represent different genetic complementation groups not only from one another, but also from the bleomycin-sensitive mutant xrs-6, isolated on the basis of X-ray sensitivity by Jeggo and Kemp [Mutation Res., 112 (1983) 313–319]. These results indicate that at least 3 gene products are involved in cellular protection against bleomycin toxicity in mammalian cells.