为社区主导的海洋能源发展选择波浪能装置

Molly Grear, Ali Trueworthy, Aeron Roach, Hannah Mankle
{"title":"为社区主导的海洋能源发展选择波浪能装置","authors":"Molly Grear, Ali Trueworthy, Aeron Roach, Hannah Mankle","doi":"10.36688/ewtec-2023-385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As we pursue more justice and community driven renewable energy projects, more decision making is put in the hands of community leaders. Appropriate tools and resources are necessary for communities to determine what wave energy developer might fit their community needs and wave resource. While there are methods and tools for communities, researchers and wave energy developers to determine the wave resource or potential locations for wave energy development, we are lacking a tool to help communities take the next steps in pursuing wave energy.
 A community driven design process was undertaken in Sitka, AK, in conjunction with evaluating the local area for wave energy resource. The community had interest in wave energy development, a decent wave resource area accessible, and existing maritime expertise that could aid in operations and maintenance. Further, as a remote island, the community viewed alternative energy development positively as a way to achieve more energy independence. Still, in this community driven process, we identified a gap that while the community may be interested in a wave energy project, there was little data on which wave energy devices would be appropriate for the community and few tools to help them choose.
 This presentation will highlight questions that the participants from Sitka, AK still have after engaging in a community centered design process. We compare the requirements that the community prioritizes with the tools that researchers and developers have to evaluate those requirements, allowing assessment of whether these tools are useable and adequate for community use. We also show an analysis of a selection of current wave energy developers with some of the community focused factors and proposals for tools that may be useful in future community energy development. This research ultimately highlights what factors must be presented to a community for them to choose to pursue installation of a device.","PeriodicalId":201789,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choosing wave energy devices for community-led marine energy development\",\"authors\":\"Molly Grear, Ali Trueworthy, Aeron Roach, Hannah Mankle\",\"doi\":\"10.36688/ewtec-2023-385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As we pursue more justice and community driven renewable energy projects, more decision making is put in the hands of community leaders. Appropriate tools and resources are necessary for communities to determine what wave energy developer might fit their community needs and wave resource. While there are methods and tools for communities, researchers and wave energy developers to determine the wave resource or potential locations for wave energy development, we are lacking a tool to help communities take the next steps in pursuing wave energy.
 A community driven design process was undertaken in Sitka, AK, in conjunction with evaluating the local area for wave energy resource. The community had interest in wave energy development, a decent wave resource area accessible, and existing maritime expertise that could aid in operations and maintenance. Further, as a remote island, the community viewed alternative energy development positively as a way to achieve more energy independence. Still, in this community driven process, we identified a gap that while the community may be interested in a wave energy project, there was little data on which wave energy devices would be appropriate for the community and few tools to help them choose.
 This presentation will highlight questions that the participants from Sitka, AK still have after engaging in a community centered design process. We compare the requirements that the community prioritizes with the tools that researchers and developers have to evaluate those requirements, allowing assessment of whether these tools are useable and adequate for community use. We also show an analysis of a selection of current wave energy developers with some of the community focused factors and proposals for tools that may be useful in future community energy development. This research ultimately highlights what factors must be presented to a community for them to choose to pursue installation of a device.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36688/ewtec-2023-385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36688/ewtec-2023-385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当我们追求更多的正义和社区驱动的可再生能源项目时,更多的决策权交给了社区领导人。社区需要适当的工具和资源来确定哪些波浪能开发商可能适合他们的社区需求和波浪资源。虽然社区、研究人员和波浪能开发人员有方法和工具来确定波浪能开发的波浪资源或潜在位置,但我们缺乏一种工具来帮助社区采取下一步追求波浪能的措施。 在AK的Sitka进行了社区驱动的设计过程,同时评估了当地的波浪能资源。社区对波浪能开发,可获得的体面的波浪资源区域以及现有的海事专业知识可以帮助操作和维护感兴趣。此外,作为一个偏远的岛屿,该社区积极地将替代能源发展视为实现更多能源独立的一种方式。尽管如此,在这个社区驱动的过程中,我们发现了一个差距,虽然社区可能对波浪能项目感兴趣,但很少有数据表明哪些波浪能设备适合社区,也很少有工具来帮助他们选择。 本次演讲将突出来自AK Sitka的参与者在参与以社区为中心的设计过程后仍然存在的问题。我们将社区优先考虑的需求与研究人员和开发人员用来评估这些需求的工具进行比较,从而评估这些工具是否可用,是否适合社区使用。我们还展示了对当前波浪能开发商的选择的分析,其中包括一些社区关注的因素和对未来社区能源开发可能有用的工具的建议。这项研究最终强调了必须向社区展示哪些因素才能使他们选择继续安装设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Choosing wave energy devices for community-led marine energy development
As we pursue more justice and community driven renewable energy projects, more decision making is put in the hands of community leaders. Appropriate tools and resources are necessary for communities to determine what wave energy developer might fit their community needs and wave resource. While there are methods and tools for communities, researchers and wave energy developers to determine the wave resource or potential locations for wave energy development, we are lacking a tool to help communities take the next steps in pursuing wave energy. A community driven design process was undertaken in Sitka, AK, in conjunction with evaluating the local area for wave energy resource. The community had interest in wave energy development, a decent wave resource area accessible, and existing maritime expertise that could aid in operations and maintenance. Further, as a remote island, the community viewed alternative energy development positively as a way to achieve more energy independence. Still, in this community driven process, we identified a gap that while the community may be interested in a wave energy project, there was little data on which wave energy devices would be appropriate for the community and few tools to help them choose. This presentation will highlight questions that the participants from Sitka, AK still have after engaging in a community centered design process. We compare the requirements that the community prioritizes with the tools that researchers and developers have to evaluate those requirements, allowing assessment of whether these tools are useable and adequate for community use. We also show an analysis of a selection of current wave energy developers with some of the community focused factors and proposals for tools that may be useful in future community energy development. This research ultimately highlights what factors must be presented to a community for them to choose to pursue installation of a device.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Open Sea Trial of a Wave-Energy Converter at Tuticorin Port – Challenges comprehensive assessment tool for low-TRL current energy converters Wave energy communication and social opposition Choosing wave energy devices for community-led marine energy development Tidal turbulence in medium depth water, primarily a model study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1