左束近端分支阻滞的诊断标准及其对心脏再同步化治疗成功的预测意义

E. M. Rimskaya, S. Yu. Kashtanova, Kh. F. Salami, E. V. Kukharchuk, T. A. Malkina, S. A. Gaman, A. E. Komlev, N. A. Mironova, O. V. Stukalova, T. E. Imaev, R. S. Akchurin, S. P. Golitsyn
{"title":"左束近端分支阻滞的诊断标准及其对心脏再同步化治疗成功的预测意义","authors":"E. M. Rimskaya, S. Yu. Kashtanova, Kh. F. Salami, E. V. Kukharchuk, T. A. Malkina, S. A. Gaman, A. E. Komlev, N. A. Mironova, O. V. Stukalova, T. E. Imaev, R. S. Akchurin, S. P. Golitsyn","doi":"10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To develop diagnostic criteria for proximal left bundle branch block (LBBB) based on non-invasive methods and to determine the significance of these criteria in predicting the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Material and methods . To develop criteria, 58 patients (21 men, mean age, 76,1±7,1 years) with LBBB occurred immediately after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) were included. To assess the significance of the developed criteria, the second group included 22 patients (11 men, mean age, 57,9±9,3 years) with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), who had indications for CRT. The effectiveness of CRT was assessed by echocardiography 6 months after implantation. All patients in the DCM group and 15 patients in the TAVI group underwent superficial epiand endocardial non-invasive mapping using Amycard 01C EP Lab (EP Solutions SA, Switzerland). Patients in the DCM group underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before device implantation. Results. The criteria for proximal LBBB included 3 electrocardiographic features: QRS complex >130 ms in women and 140 ms in men, QSor rS-configuration in V1 lead, notch in two or more lateral leads (I, avL, V5, V6), and 2 mapping criteria: characteristic location of block line and delayed activation point. In the DCM group, the criteria were positive in 13 of 22 patients (59%). The developed criteria for proximal LBBB showed a relatively strong, significant relationship with the positive effect of CRT (сhi-square test =5,46, p=0,02, Cramer test =0,5, odds ratio (OR)=15,0, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1,32-169,9, p=0,002). An additional analysis showed that both the criteria for proximal block and CRT effect are associated with myocardial fibrosis according to MRI. In particular, intramural stria-shaped contrast accumulation in the interventricular septum leads to a change in characteristic of proximal block mapping phenomena — displacement of delayed activation point (chi-square test =13,9, p<0,001, Cramer test =0,79) and displacement or absence of conduction block lines (chi-square test =6,92, p=0,009, Cramer test =0,56) and prevents the CRT effect (OR =8,67, 95% CI, 1,05-71,57 p=0,03). Conclusion. Proximal LBBB is only one of the factors determining the effectiveness of CRT. Proximal LBBB may mask significant myocardial structural changes that prevent the CRT success.","PeriodicalId":21389,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Cardiology","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic criteria for proximal left bundle branch block and their significance in predicting the success of cardiac resynchronization therapy\",\"authors\":\"E. M. Rimskaya, S. Yu. Kashtanova, Kh. F. Salami, E. V. Kukharchuk, T. A. Malkina, S. A. Gaman, A. E. Komlev, N. A. Mironova, O. V. Stukalova, T. E. Imaev, R. S. Akchurin, S. P. Golitsyn\",\"doi\":\"10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim. To develop diagnostic criteria for proximal left bundle branch block (LBBB) based on non-invasive methods and to determine the significance of these criteria in predicting the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Material and methods . To develop criteria, 58 patients (21 men, mean age, 76,1±7,1 years) with LBBB occurred immediately after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) were included. To assess the significance of the developed criteria, the second group included 22 patients (11 men, mean age, 57,9±9,3 years) with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), who had indications for CRT. The effectiveness of CRT was assessed by echocardiography 6 months after implantation. All patients in the DCM group and 15 patients in the TAVI group underwent superficial epiand endocardial non-invasive mapping using Amycard 01C EP Lab (EP Solutions SA, Switzerland). Patients in the DCM group underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before device implantation. Results. The criteria for proximal LBBB included 3 electrocardiographic features: QRS complex >130 ms in women and 140 ms in men, QSor rS-configuration in V1 lead, notch in two or more lateral leads (I, avL, V5, V6), and 2 mapping criteria: characteristic location of block line and delayed activation point. In the DCM group, the criteria were positive in 13 of 22 patients (59%). The developed criteria for proximal LBBB showed a relatively strong, significant relationship with the positive effect of CRT (сhi-square test =5,46, p=0,02, Cramer test =0,5, odds ratio (OR)=15,0, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1,32-169,9, p=0,002). An additional analysis showed that both the criteria for proximal block and CRT effect are associated with myocardial fibrosis according to MRI. In particular, intramural stria-shaped contrast accumulation in the interventricular septum leads to a change in characteristic of proximal block mapping phenomena — displacement of delayed activation point (chi-square test =13,9, p<0,001, Cramer test =0,79) and displacement or absence of conduction block lines (chi-square test =6,92, p=0,009, Cramer test =0,56) and prevents the CRT effect (OR =8,67, 95% CI, 1,05-71,57 p=0,03). Conclusion. Proximal LBBB is only one of the factors determining the effectiveness of CRT. Proximal LBBB may mask significant myocardial structural changes that prevent the CRT success.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2023-5403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

的目标。建立基于无创方法的左束近端分支阻滞(LBBB)的诊断标准,并确定这些标准在预测心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)效果中的意义。材料和方法。为了制定标准,我们纳入了58例经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后立即发生LBBB的患者(男性21例,平均年龄76,1±7.1岁)。为了评估制定的标准的意义,第二组纳入22例扩张型心肌病(DCM)患者(11名男性,平均年龄57,9±9.3岁),有CRT指征。植入后6个月通过超声心动图评价CRT的有效性。DCM组的所有患者和TAVI组的15例患者使用Amycard 01C EP Lab (EP Solutions SA, Switzerland)进行了浅表心内膜和心内膜无创测绘。DCM组患者在器械植入前行增强心脏磁共振成像(MRI)检查。结果。LBBB近端诊断标准包括3个心电图特征:QRS复合体(女性130 ms,男性140 ms)、V1导联QSor rs配置、两个或多个侧导联(I、avL、V5、V6)存在缺口,以及2个定位标准:阻滞线和延迟激活点的特征位置。在DCM组,22例患者中有13例(59%)的标准为阳性。所制定的近端下脑屏障标准与CRT的积极效果有较强的显著关系(平方检验=5,46,p=0,02, Cramer检验=0,5,优势比(OR)=15,0, 95%可信区间(CI), 1,32-169,9, p=0,002)。另一项分析显示,根据MRI,近端阻滞和CRT效应的标准都与心肌纤维化有关。特别是室间隔壁内纹状造影剂堆积导致近端脑块映射现象特征的改变——延迟激活点位移(卡方检验=13,9,p< 001, Cramer检验=0,79)和传导阻滞线位移或缺失(卡方检验=6,92,p=0,009, Cramer检验=0,56),从而阻止了CRT效应(or =8,67, 95% CI, 1,05-71,57 p=0,03)。结论。近侧下脑屏障只是决定CRT有效性的因素之一。近侧LBBB可能掩盖了显著的心肌结构改变,阻碍了CRT的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic criteria for proximal left bundle branch block and their significance in predicting the success of cardiac resynchronization therapy
Aim. To develop diagnostic criteria for proximal left bundle branch block (LBBB) based on non-invasive methods and to determine the significance of these criteria in predicting the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Material and methods . To develop criteria, 58 patients (21 men, mean age, 76,1±7,1 years) with LBBB occurred immediately after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) were included. To assess the significance of the developed criteria, the second group included 22 patients (11 men, mean age, 57,9±9,3 years) with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), who had indications for CRT. The effectiveness of CRT was assessed by echocardiography 6 months after implantation. All patients in the DCM group and 15 patients in the TAVI group underwent superficial epiand endocardial non-invasive mapping using Amycard 01C EP Lab (EP Solutions SA, Switzerland). Patients in the DCM group underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before device implantation. Results. The criteria for proximal LBBB included 3 electrocardiographic features: QRS complex >130 ms in women and 140 ms in men, QSor rS-configuration in V1 lead, notch in two or more lateral leads (I, avL, V5, V6), and 2 mapping criteria: characteristic location of block line and delayed activation point. In the DCM group, the criteria were positive in 13 of 22 patients (59%). The developed criteria for proximal LBBB showed a relatively strong, significant relationship with the positive effect of CRT (сhi-square test =5,46, p=0,02, Cramer test =0,5, odds ratio (OR)=15,0, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1,32-169,9, p=0,002). An additional analysis showed that both the criteria for proximal block and CRT effect are associated with myocardial fibrosis according to MRI. In particular, intramural stria-shaped contrast accumulation in the interventricular septum leads to a change in characteristic of proximal block mapping phenomena — displacement of delayed activation point (chi-square test =13,9, p<0,001, Cramer test =0,79) and displacement or absence of conduction block lines (chi-square test =6,92, p=0,009, Cramer test =0,56) and prevents the CRT effect (OR =8,67, 95% CI, 1,05-71,57 p=0,03). Conclusion. Proximal LBBB is only one of the factors determining the effectiveness of CRT. Proximal LBBB may mask significant myocardial structural changes that prevent the CRT success.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Russian Journal of Cardiology
Russian Journal of Cardiology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Russian Journal of Cardiology has been issued since 1996. The language of this publication is Russian, with tables of contents and abstracts of all articles presented in English as well. Editor-in-Chief: Prof. Eugene V.Shlyakhto, President of the Russian Society of Cardiology. The aim of the journal is both scientific and practical, also with referring to organizing matters of the Society. The best of all cardiologic research in Russia is submitted to the Journal. Moreover, it contains useful tips and clinical examples for practicing cardiologists. Journal is peer-reviewed, with multi-stage editing. The editorial board is presented by the leading cardiologists from different cities of Russia.
期刊最新文献
Mature neutrophils as a marker of hypoechoic carotid plaques and a predictor of polyvascular disease progression Oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation in patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease Myocardial infarction in persons aged ≥75 years: factors influencing inhospital mortality Comparative analysis of two multitask approaches to cognitive training in cardiac surgery patients Use of antiplatelet agents in patients after myocardial infarction followed up in Moscow outpatient clinics. Results of a non-interventional prospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1