{"title":"危在旦夕的性别平等:意大利董事会中的女性战略、象征性暴力和抵抗","authors":"Zenia Simonella, Simona Cuomo","doi":"10.1080/09589236.2023.2258098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTItaly promulgated the ‘Golfo-Mosca Law’ obliging companies to introduce gender quotas on boards of directors. The goal was to analyse whether or to what extent women bring gender equality to boards’ debates as well as men’s reactions following the introduction of quotas. The authors interviewed 100 women directors and 34 men CEOs/Presidents between June 2020 and February 2021, referring to the concepts of ‘critical mass’, ‘symbolic violence’ and ‘post-feminist sensibility’ in order to interpret the data. The analysis shows that gender quotas are considered necessary for modifying boards’ routines. However, the introduction of the gender equality topic in the debate is difficult, also in a critical mass situation, depending on the experience of women within boards. In relation to this, the authors identify strategies adopted by women (‘avoiding’, ‘neutral’ and ‘empowering’) and forms of resistance they encountered within the boards (‘denial’, ‘second class citizenship’, ‘microaggressions’, ‘backlash and gender fatigue’), showing that the potential transformative role of women as board members is variable and limited. Men appear as the guardians of the gendered symbolic order, considering gender equality as a means to enhance companies’ reputations.KEYWORDS: Genderquotasfeminismsymbolic violenceboardItaly Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.DataFor information regarding our data, please contact the corresponding author.Notes1. Each interviewee was adequately informed in relation to the research objectives, the use of data and the respect for personal information and privacy following the ethical guidelines of the authors’ institution.2. Environmental, Social, Governance criteria.Additional informationFundingThe authors would like to thank: Valore D Association as our unique project partner and Generali and McKinsey as our financial sponsors.Notes on contributorsZenia SimonellaZenia Simonella is post-doc research fellow, Dep. Sociology and Social Research, University of Milan-Bicocca and fellow at Diversity, Inclusion & Smart Working Monitor, Sda Bocconi School of Management. Research areas: gender studies, diversity and inclusion management, sociology of knowledge/science, sociology of everyday life, methodology of social sciences.Simona CuomoSimona Cuomo is Associate Professor of Practice of Leadership, Organization & Human Resources and Coordinator of the Diversity, Inclusion & Smart Working Monitor at Sda Bocconi School of Management. Research areas: gender studies, diversity and inclusion management, leadership, team management, remote working.","PeriodicalId":15911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gender Studies","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender equality at stake: women’s strategies, symbolic violence and resistance in Italian boards of directors\",\"authors\":\"Zenia Simonella, Simona Cuomo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09589236.2023.2258098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTItaly promulgated the ‘Golfo-Mosca Law’ obliging companies to introduce gender quotas on boards of directors. The goal was to analyse whether or to what extent women bring gender equality to boards’ debates as well as men’s reactions following the introduction of quotas. The authors interviewed 100 women directors and 34 men CEOs/Presidents between June 2020 and February 2021, referring to the concepts of ‘critical mass’, ‘symbolic violence’ and ‘post-feminist sensibility’ in order to interpret the data. The analysis shows that gender quotas are considered necessary for modifying boards’ routines. However, the introduction of the gender equality topic in the debate is difficult, also in a critical mass situation, depending on the experience of women within boards. In relation to this, the authors identify strategies adopted by women (‘avoiding’, ‘neutral’ and ‘empowering’) and forms of resistance they encountered within the boards (‘denial’, ‘second class citizenship’, ‘microaggressions’, ‘backlash and gender fatigue’), showing that the potential transformative role of women as board members is variable and limited. Men appear as the guardians of the gendered symbolic order, considering gender equality as a means to enhance companies’ reputations.KEYWORDS: Genderquotasfeminismsymbolic violenceboardItaly Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.DataFor information regarding our data, please contact the corresponding author.Notes1. Each interviewee was adequately informed in relation to the research objectives, the use of data and the respect for personal information and privacy following the ethical guidelines of the authors’ institution.2. Environmental, Social, Governance criteria.Additional informationFundingThe authors would like to thank: Valore D Association as our unique project partner and Generali and McKinsey as our financial sponsors.Notes on contributorsZenia SimonellaZenia Simonella is post-doc research fellow, Dep. Sociology and Social Research, University of Milan-Bicocca and fellow at Diversity, Inclusion & Smart Working Monitor, Sda Bocconi School of Management. Research areas: gender studies, diversity and inclusion management, sociology of knowledge/science, sociology of everyday life, methodology of social sciences.Simona CuomoSimona Cuomo is Associate Professor of Practice of Leadership, Organization & Human Resources and Coordinator of the Diversity, Inclusion & Smart Working Monitor at Sda Bocconi School of Management. Research areas: gender studies, diversity and inclusion management, leadership, team management, remote working.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gender Studies\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gender Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2023.2258098\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gender Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2023.2258098","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gender equality at stake: women’s strategies, symbolic violence and resistance in Italian boards of directors
ABSTRACTItaly promulgated the ‘Golfo-Mosca Law’ obliging companies to introduce gender quotas on boards of directors. The goal was to analyse whether or to what extent women bring gender equality to boards’ debates as well as men’s reactions following the introduction of quotas. The authors interviewed 100 women directors and 34 men CEOs/Presidents between June 2020 and February 2021, referring to the concepts of ‘critical mass’, ‘symbolic violence’ and ‘post-feminist sensibility’ in order to interpret the data. The analysis shows that gender quotas are considered necessary for modifying boards’ routines. However, the introduction of the gender equality topic in the debate is difficult, also in a critical mass situation, depending on the experience of women within boards. In relation to this, the authors identify strategies adopted by women (‘avoiding’, ‘neutral’ and ‘empowering’) and forms of resistance they encountered within the boards (‘denial’, ‘second class citizenship’, ‘microaggressions’, ‘backlash and gender fatigue’), showing that the potential transformative role of women as board members is variable and limited. Men appear as the guardians of the gendered symbolic order, considering gender equality as a means to enhance companies’ reputations.KEYWORDS: Genderquotasfeminismsymbolic violenceboardItaly Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.DataFor information regarding our data, please contact the corresponding author.Notes1. Each interviewee was adequately informed in relation to the research objectives, the use of data and the respect for personal information and privacy following the ethical guidelines of the authors’ institution.2. Environmental, Social, Governance criteria.Additional informationFundingThe authors would like to thank: Valore D Association as our unique project partner and Generali and McKinsey as our financial sponsors.Notes on contributorsZenia SimonellaZenia Simonella is post-doc research fellow, Dep. Sociology and Social Research, University of Milan-Bicocca and fellow at Diversity, Inclusion & Smart Working Monitor, Sda Bocconi School of Management. Research areas: gender studies, diversity and inclusion management, sociology of knowledge/science, sociology of everyday life, methodology of social sciences.Simona CuomoSimona Cuomo is Associate Professor of Practice of Leadership, Organization & Human Resources and Coordinator of the Diversity, Inclusion & Smart Working Monitor at Sda Bocconi School of Management. Research areas: gender studies, diversity and inclusion management, leadership, team management, remote working.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Gender Studies is an interdisciplinary journal which publishes articles relating to gender from a feminist perspective covering a wide range of subject areas including the Social and Natural Sciences, Arts and Popular Culture. Reviews of books and details of forthcoming conferences are also included. The Journal of Gender Studies seeks articles from international sources and aims to take account of a diversity of cultural backgrounds and differences in sexual orientation. It encourages contributions which focus on the experiences of both women and men and welcomes articles, written from a feminist perspective, relating to femininity and masculinity and to the social constructions of relationships between men and women.