一种新颖的、基于深度学习的、用于乳房美学评分的自动光度分析软件

IF 1.3 Q3 SURGERY Archives of Plastic Surgery-APS Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1055/a-2190-5781
Joseph Kyu-hyung Park, Seungchul Baek, Chan Yeong Heo, Jae Hoon Jeong, Yujin Myung
{"title":"一种新颖的、基于深度学习的、用于乳房美学评分的自动光度分析软件","authors":"Joseph Kyu-hyung Park, Seungchul Baek, Chan Yeong Heo, Jae Hoon Jeong, Yujin Myung","doi":"10.1055/a-2190-5781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Breast aesthetics evaluation often relies on subjective assessments, leading to the need for objective, automated tools. We developed the Seoul Breast Esthetic Scoring Tool (S-BEST), a photometric analysis software that utilizes a DenseNet-264 deep learning model to automatically evaluate breast landmarks and asymmetry indices. Methods: S-BEST was trained on a dataset of frontal breast photographs annotated with 30 specific landmarks, divided into an 80-20 training-validation split. The software requires the distances of sternal notch to nipple or nipple-to-nipple as input and performs image preprocessing steps, including ratio correction and 8-bit normalization. Breast asymmetry indices and cm based measurements are provided as the output. The accuracy of S-BEST was validated using a paired t-test and Bland-Altman plots, comparing its measurements to those obtained from physical examinations of 100 females diagnosed with breast cancer. Results: S-BEST demonstrated high accuracy in automatic landmark localization, with most distances showing no statistically significant difference compared to physical measurements. However, the nipple-to-inframammary fold distance showed a significant bias, with a coefficient of determination ranging from 0.3787 to 0.4234 for the left and right sides, respectively. Conclusions: S-BEST provides a fast, reliable, and automated approach for breast aesthetic evaluation based on 2D frontal photographs. While limited by its inability to capture volumetric attributes or multiple viewpoints, it serves as an accessible tool for both clinical and research applications.","PeriodicalId":47543,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Plastic Surgery-APS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel, Deep Learning Based, Automatic Photometric Analysis Software for Breast Aesthetic Scoring\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Kyu-hyung Park, Seungchul Baek, Chan Yeong Heo, Jae Hoon Jeong, Yujin Myung\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2190-5781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Breast aesthetics evaluation often relies on subjective assessments, leading to the need for objective, automated tools. We developed the Seoul Breast Esthetic Scoring Tool (S-BEST), a photometric analysis software that utilizes a DenseNet-264 deep learning model to automatically evaluate breast landmarks and asymmetry indices. Methods: S-BEST was trained on a dataset of frontal breast photographs annotated with 30 specific landmarks, divided into an 80-20 training-validation split. The software requires the distances of sternal notch to nipple or nipple-to-nipple as input and performs image preprocessing steps, including ratio correction and 8-bit normalization. Breast asymmetry indices and cm based measurements are provided as the output. The accuracy of S-BEST was validated using a paired t-test and Bland-Altman plots, comparing its measurements to those obtained from physical examinations of 100 females diagnosed with breast cancer. Results: S-BEST demonstrated high accuracy in automatic landmark localization, with most distances showing no statistically significant difference compared to physical measurements. However, the nipple-to-inframammary fold distance showed a significant bias, with a coefficient of determination ranging from 0.3787 to 0.4234 for the left and right sides, respectively. Conclusions: S-BEST provides a fast, reliable, and automated approach for breast aesthetic evaluation based on 2D frontal photographs. While limited by its inability to capture volumetric attributes or multiple viewpoints, it serves as an accessible tool for both clinical and research applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Plastic Surgery-APS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Plastic Surgery-APS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2190-5781\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Plastic Surgery-APS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2190-5781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳房美学评价往往依赖于主观评价,导致需要客观的,自动化的工具。我们开发了首尔乳房美学评分工具(S-BEST),这是一种光度分析软件,利用DenseNet-264深度学习模型自动评估乳房标志和不对称指数。方法:S-BEST在带有30个特定地标的正面乳房照片数据集上进行训练,并将其划分为80-20的训练-验证分割。该软件需要胸骨切迹到乳头或乳头到乳头的距离作为输入,并执行图像预处理步骤,包括比例校正和8位归一化。乳房不对称指数和基于厘米的测量提供作为输出。使用配对t检验和Bland-Altman图验证了S-BEST的准确性,并将其测量结果与100名诊断为乳腺癌的女性的体检结果进行了比较。结果:S-BEST在自动地标定位方面具有较高的准确性,与物理测量相比,大多数距离没有统计学差异。然而,乳头到乳下褶皱距离显示出显著的偏倚,左右两侧的决定系数分别为0.3787 ~ 0.4234。结论:S-BEST为基于二维正面照片的乳房美学评价提供了快速、可靠和自动化的方法。虽然由于无法捕获体积属性或多视点而受到限制,但它可以作为临床和研究应用的可访问工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Novel, Deep Learning Based, Automatic Photometric Analysis Software for Breast Aesthetic Scoring
Background: Breast aesthetics evaluation often relies on subjective assessments, leading to the need for objective, automated tools. We developed the Seoul Breast Esthetic Scoring Tool (S-BEST), a photometric analysis software that utilizes a DenseNet-264 deep learning model to automatically evaluate breast landmarks and asymmetry indices. Methods: S-BEST was trained on a dataset of frontal breast photographs annotated with 30 specific landmarks, divided into an 80-20 training-validation split. The software requires the distances of sternal notch to nipple or nipple-to-nipple as input and performs image preprocessing steps, including ratio correction and 8-bit normalization. Breast asymmetry indices and cm based measurements are provided as the output. The accuracy of S-BEST was validated using a paired t-test and Bland-Altman plots, comparing its measurements to those obtained from physical examinations of 100 females diagnosed with breast cancer. Results: S-BEST demonstrated high accuracy in automatic landmark localization, with most distances showing no statistically significant difference compared to physical measurements. However, the nipple-to-inframammary fold distance showed a significant bias, with a coefficient of determination ranging from 0.3787 to 0.4234 for the left and right sides, respectively. Conclusions: S-BEST provides a fast, reliable, and automated approach for breast aesthetic evaluation based on 2D frontal photographs. While limited by its inability to capture volumetric attributes or multiple viewpoints, it serves as an accessible tool for both clinical and research applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
131
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Minilifting: Short-Scar Rhytidectomy with Thread Lifting. The Old and the New-An Ellege. Distally Based Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventive Healing Approach-A Modification of the Classic Approach. Safety and Effectiveness of Liposuction Modalities in Managing Lipedema: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. "Funducation"-The New Age of Learning, Intersection of Education, and Fun.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1