Maycon F. C. dos Santos, Martín R. Alvarez, Camila R. Cassano
{"title":"海蛾的饮食习惯(Weksler, Geise &;Cerqueira, 1999)(啮齿目:蟋蟀科)森林地层:方法和生境的比较","authors":"Maycon F. C. dos Santos, Martín R. Alvarez, Camila R. Cassano","doi":"10.1080/01650521.2023.2265642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTFood habits are traces of a species’ natural history that help us to understand how the organisms interact with the environment. Hylaeamys seuanezi is a forest-specialist rodent also recorded in diverse shaded cocoa agroforestry systems. Here we describe and classify its diet, comparing the results acquired from stomach and fecal contents, collected in forest and cocoa agroforest sites. We analyzed 203 samples from 126 individuals: 51 captured in agroforest and 75 in forest. We measured the relative contribution of vegetable and animal matter and the relative frequency of 17 food items. Our results indicate that H. seuanezi consumes a greater proportion of vegetable than animal matter, but should be considered omnivore, given the frequent consumption of arthropods. The richness and composition of items was similar between stomach and fecal samples. The richness of items also did not vary between the environments, but the composition of the items did. Intact seeds were more frequent in samples from forests and unidentified arthropods and Hymenoptera in samples from agroforest. Despite variation among consumed items, the diverse shaded cocoa agroforestry systems provide a diversity of resources, which likely favor the maintenance of H. seuanezi in these plantations and in the study region.KEYWORDS: Atlantic Forestdietsmall mammalfeeding ecology AcknowledgmentsWe thank the Laboratório de Ecologia Aplicada à Conservação and Laboratório de Zoologia de Vertebrados for logistical support, and Caipora’s and Rhip’s fraternities, specitally to Adna Alves, Elson Rios, Gean Zanetti and Rebeca Sampaio, for field and data collection assistance. We are also grateful to Santiago Alvarez Martinez for the English translation and to former reviewers for enhancing the previous versions of the manuscript.Data availability statementData set is available from Mendeley repository (doi:10.17632/wn5282×z6v.1).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01650521.2023.2265642.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by INCT IN-TREE [CNPq-465767/2014-1, CAPES-23038.000776/2017-54], CNPq-PPBio Rede BioMA [457524/2012-0], SISBIOTA [563216/2010-7], FAPESB-PPP [0008/2011] and UESC [073.6764.2020.0003917-18; 00220.1100.1264; 00220.1100.1645 and 00220.1100.1536]. We thank CAPES and UESC - ICB for MFCS masters’ and undergrad scholarships, respectively.","PeriodicalId":49465,"journal":{"name":"Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food habits of <i>Hylaeamys seuanezi</i> (Weksler, Geise & Cerqueira, 1999) (Rodentia: Cricetidae) in forest formations: a comparison of methods and habitats\",\"authors\":\"Maycon F. C. dos Santos, Martín R. Alvarez, Camila R. Cassano\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01650521.2023.2265642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTFood habits are traces of a species’ natural history that help us to understand how the organisms interact with the environment. Hylaeamys seuanezi is a forest-specialist rodent also recorded in diverse shaded cocoa agroforestry systems. Here we describe and classify its diet, comparing the results acquired from stomach and fecal contents, collected in forest and cocoa agroforest sites. We analyzed 203 samples from 126 individuals: 51 captured in agroforest and 75 in forest. We measured the relative contribution of vegetable and animal matter and the relative frequency of 17 food items. Our results indicate that H. seuanezi consumes a greater proportion of vegetable than animal matter, but should be considered omnivore, given the frequent consumption of arthropods. The richness and composition of items was similar between stomach and fecal samples. The richness of items also did not vary between the environments, but the composition of the items did. Intact seeds were more frequent in samples from forests and unidentified arthropods and Hymenoptera in samples from agroforest. Despite variation among consumed items, the diverse shaded cocoa agroforestry systems provide a diversity of resources, which likely favor the maintenance of H. seuanezi in these plantations and in the study region.KEYWORDS: Atlantic Forestdietsmall mammalfeeding ecology AcknowledgmentsWe thank the Laboratório de Ecologia Aplicada à Conservação and Laboratório de Zoologia de Vertebrados for logistical support, and Caipora’s and Rhip’s fraternities, specitally to Adna Alves, Elson Rios, Gean Zanetti and Rebeca Sampaio, for field and data collection assistance. We are also grateful to Santiago Alvarez Martinez for the English translation and to former reviewers for enhancing the previous versions of the manuscript.Data availability statementData set is available from Mendeley repository (doi:10.17632/wn5282×z6v.1).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01650521.2023.2265642.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by INCT IN-TREE [CNPq-465767/2014-1, CAPES-23038.000776/2017-54], CNPq-PPBio Rede BioMA [457524/2012-0], SISBIOTA [563216/2010-7], FAPESB-PPP [0008/2011] and UESC [073.6764.2020.0003917-18; 00220.1100.1264; 00220.1100.1645 and 00220.1100.1536]. We thank CAPES and UESC - ICB for MFCS masters’ and undergrad scholarships, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01650521.2023.2265642\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01650521.2023.2265642","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Food habits of Hylaeamys seuanezi (Weksler, Geise & Cerqueira, 1999) (Rodentia: Cricetidae) in forest formations: a comparison of methods and habitats
ABSTRACTFood habits are traces of a species’ natural history that help us to understand how the organisms interact with the environment. Hylaeamys seuanezi is a forest-specialist rodent also recorded in diverse shaded cocoa agroforestry systems. Here we describe and classify its diet, comparing the results acquired from stomach and fecal contents, collected in forest and cocoa agroforest sites. We analyzed 203 samples from 126 individuals: 51 captured in agroforest and 75 in forest. We measured the relative contribution of vegetable and animal matter and the relative frequency of 17 food items. Our results indicate that H. seuanezi consumes a greater proportion of vegetable than animal matter, but should be considered omnivore, given the frequent consumption of arthropods. The richness and composition of items was similar between stomach and fecal samples. The richness of items also did not vary between the environments, but the composition of the items did. Intact seeds were more frequent in samples from forests and unidentified arthropods and Hymenoptera in samples from agroforest. Despite variation among consumed items, the diverse shaded cocoa agroforestry systems provide a diversity of resources, which likely favor the maintenance of H. seuanezi in these plantations and in the study region.KEYWORDS: Atlantic Forestdietsmall mammalfeeding ecology AcknowledgmentsWe thank the Laboratório de Ecologia Aplicada à Conservação and Laboratório de Zoologia de Vertebrados for logistical support, and Caipora’s and Rhip’s fraternities, specitally to Adna Alves, Elson Rios, Gean Zanetti and Rebeca Sampaio, for field and data collection assistance. We are also grateful to Santiago Alvarez Martinez for the English translation and to former reviewers for enhancing the previous versions of the manuscript.Data availability statementData set is available from Mendeley repository (doi:10.17632/wn5282×z6v.1).Supplementary materialSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01650521.2023.2265642.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by INCT IN-TREE [CNPq-465767/2014-1, CAPES-23038.000776/2017-54], CNPq-PPBio Rede BioMA [457524/2012-0], SISBIOTA [563216/2010-7], FAPESB-PPP [0008/2011] and UESC [073.6764.2020.0003917-18; 00220.1100.1264; 00220.1100.1645 and 00220.1100.1536]. We thank CAPES and UESC - ICB for MFCS masters’ and undergrad scholarships, respectively.
期刊介绍:
There is still a far from complete understanding of the complex ecosystems in the Neotropics, although they have been studied since the first expeditions of the old world naturalists Marcgrave, Humboldt, Spix, Darwin, Bates and Müller. The aims and scope of the Journal are, besides taxonomic and zoogeographic surveys, analyses of animal communities and their relationship with biotic and abiotic environmental conditions. This includes the fauna of both terrestrial and fresh water ecosystems in the Neotropics. Contributions that represent original research and mini-reviews are welcome.
Manuscripts presenting just checklists and new geographic records are not considered for publication.
If manuscripts do not meet the requirements of the journal, the editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts on submission or to ask for revisions prior to formal peer review.