知识边界资源在平台生态系统中的作用——来自SAP业务技术平台的见解和设计含义

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS R&D Management Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1111/radm.12644
Martin Kauschinger, Maximilian Schreieck, Helmut Krcmar
{"title":"知识边界资源在平台生态系统中的作用——来自SAP业务技术平台的见解和设计含义","authors":"Martin Kauschinger, Maximilian Schreieck, Helmut Krcmar","doi":"10.1111/radm.12644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Platform ecosystems shift the locus of innovation from internal departments to third‐party developers, leading to knowledge boundaries between the platform owner and these external developers. Whereas traditional knowledge management approaches focus on intra‐organizational knowledge sharing, platform owners have to adopt an inter‐organizational approach to integrate knowledge across firm boundaries. Platform owners thus rely on knowledge boundary resources such as technical documentation, information portals, training materials, sample code, blogs, and online communities to overcome knowledge boundaries in their ecosystems. Existing research has identified different types of knowledge boundaries and knowledge boundary resources, but further research is needed to clarify how they influence third‐party application development. Against this background, we study how third‐party developers integrate knowledge boundary resources into their development practices. To derive an in‐depth understanding of the phenomenon, we used cognitive fit theory and conducted a single case study of SAP's Business Technology Platform. Based on 23 interviews, we developed a process model and distilled two primary purposes why third‐party developers use knowledge boundary resources: learning and problem‐solving. Based on these purposes, we explain the emergence of a knowledge boundary resource‐purpose fit that shapes the selection, evaluation, and usage of knowledge boundary resources. We then draw upon various knowledge boundary resource characteristics to condense four cases with a particularly favorable knowledge boundary resource‐purpose fit. Based on our results, we derive five propositions to help platform owners design effective knowledge boundary resources.","PeriodicalId":21040,"journal":{"name":"R&D Management","volume":"31 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of knowledge boundary resources for platform ecosystems – insights and design implications from <scp>SAP</scp>'s Business Technology Platform\",\"authors\":\"Martin Kauschinger, Maximilian Schreieck, Helmut Krcmar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/radm.12644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Platform ecosystems shift the locus of innovation from internal departments to third‐party developers, leading to knowledge boundaries between the platform owner and these external developers. Whereas traditional knowledge management approaches focus on intra‐organizational knowledge sharing, platform owners have to adopt an inter‐organizational approach to integrate knowledge across firm boundaries. Platform owners thus rely on knowledge boundary resources such as technical documentation, information portals, training materials, sample code, blogs, and online communities to overcome knowledge boundaries in their ecosystems. Existing research has identified different types of knowledge boundaries and knowledge boundary resources, but further research is needed to clarify how they influence third‐party application development. Against this background, we study how third‐party developers integrate knowledge boundary resources into their development practices. To derive an in‐depth understanding of the phenomenon, we used cognitive fit theory and conducted a single case study of SAP's Business Technology Platform. Based on 23 interviews, we developed a process model and distilled two primary purposes why third‐party developers use knowledge boundary resources: learning and problem‐solving. Based on these purposes, we explain the emergence of a knowledge boundary resource‐purpose fit that shapes the selection, evaluation, and usage of knowledge boundary resources. We then draw upon various knowledge boundary resource characteristics to condense four cases with a particularly favorable knowledge boundary resource‐purpose fit. Based on our results, we derive five propositions to help platform owners design effective knowledge boundary resources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"R&D Management\",\"volume\":\"31 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"R&D Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12644\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"R&D Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12644","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

平台生态系统将创新重心从内部部门转移到第三方开发者,导致平台所有者和这些外部开发者之间存在知识边界。传统的知识管理方法侧重于组织内部的知识共享,而平台所有者必须采用组织间的方法来跨公司边界整合知识。因此,平台所有者依靠知识边界资源,如技术文档、信息门户、培训材料、示例代码、博客和在线社区来克服其生态系统中的知识边界。现有的研究已经确定了不同类型的知识边界和知识边界资源,但需要进一步的研究来阐明它们如何影响第三方应用程序的开发。在此背景下,我们研究了第三方开发人员如何将知识边界资源集成到他们的开发实践中。为了更深入地理解这一现象,我们运用认知契合理论,对SAP的业务技术平台进行了单一案例研究。基于23个访谈,我们开发了一个过程模型,并提炼出第三方开发者使用知识边界资源的两个主要目的:学习和解决问题。基于这些目的,我们解释了知识边界资源-目的契合的出现,它塑造了知识边界资源的选择、评估和使用。然后,我们利用各种知识边界资源特征来浓缩四个具有特别有利的知识边界资源-目的匹配的案例。基于我们的研究结果,我们提出了五个建议,以帮助平台所有者设计有效的知识边界资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of knowledge boundary resources for platform ecosystems – insights and design implications from SAP's Business Technology Platform
Platform ecosystems shift the locus of innovation from internal departments to third‐party developers, leading to knowledge boundaries between the platform owner and these external developers. Whereas traditional knowledge management approaches focus on intra‐organizational knowledge sharing, platform owners have to adopt an inter‐organizational approach to integrate knowledge across firm boundaries. Platform owners thus rely on knowledge boundary resources such as technical documentation, information portals, training materials, sample code, blogs, and online communities to overcome knowledge boundaries in their ecosystems. Existing research has identified different types of knowledge boundaries and knowledge boundary resources, but further research is needed to clarify how they influence third‐party application development. Against this background, we study how third‐party developers integrate knowledge boundary resources into their development practices. To derive an in‐depth understanding of the phenomenon, we used cognitive fit theory and conducted a single case study of SAP's Business Technology Platform. Based on 23 interviews, we developed a process model and distilled two primary purposes why third‐party developers use knowledge boundary resources: learning and problem‐solving. Based on these purposes, we explain the emergence of a knowledge boundary resource‐purpose fit that shapes the selection, evaluation, and usage of knowledge boundary resources. We then draw upon various knowledge boundary resource characteristics to condense four cases with a particularly favorable knowledge boundary resource‐purpose fit. Based on our results, we derive five propositions to help platform owners design effective knowledge boundary resources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
R&D Management
R&D Management Multiple-
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: R&D Management journal publishes articles which address the interests of both practising managers and academic researchers in research and development and innovation management. Covering the full range of topics in research, development, design and innovation, and related strategic and human resource issues - from exploratory science to commercial exploitation - articles also examine social, economic and environmental implications.
期刊最新文献
Roles of big data analytics and organizational culture in developing innovation capabilities: a hybrid PLS‐fsQCA approach Research, patents, and IPO valuation under the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 A Research Agenda for Workplace Innovation: The Challenge of Disruptive Transitions. Edited by Peter R. A.Oeij, StevenDhondt, Adela J.McMurray, Edgar Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, 2023, 978‐1‐80088‐193‐8, hardback, £115.49, pp. 304. The relationship between digital technologies and the circular economy: a systematic literature review and a research agenda Evolutionary Ideas: Unlocking Ancient Innovation to Solve Tomorrow's Challenges. By SamTatam, Harriman House Publishing: Hampshire, 2022, ISBN 978‐0‐85719‐787‐0, paperback, £9.99, pp. 240.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1