应用于Njord油田研究埋深和粘土含量对断层渗透率影响的新方法

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Petroleum Geoscience Pub Date : 2023-09-11 DOI:10.1144/petgeo2023-025
Philipp Müller, Christian Hermanrud, Haakon Fossen
{"title":"应用于Njord油田研究埋深和粘土含量对断层渗透率影响的新方法","authors":"Philipp Müller, Christian Hermanrud, Haakon Fossen","doi":"10.1144/petgeo2023-025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fault permeability prediction typically relies on empirical relationships between permeability and clay content or burial depth. Calibration of such methods relies on either core data or subsurface observations of fluid pressure and hydrocarbon contact offsets across faults. Published core data suggest that no relationships exist between host rock clay content and fault permeability for phyllosilicate-framework fault rocks, whereas published subsurface calibration data suggest otherwise. We here present a new method for calibration of fault rock permeabilities to subsurface pressure data. This approach is an analogue from electrical engineering to compute fault permeabilities across all major faults in a study area and optimise depth and clay content dependence of fault permeabilities. We tested this method at the Jurassic section of the Norwegian Njord Field area, where faults span the depth range of 2.7- 4.5 km and the lowest clay content in individual faults varies between 8.9 to 25.7%. The flow-restricting faults at Njord are phyllosilicate-framework fault rocks. Our modelling shows that fault rock permeability decreases with burial depth, whereas the clay content has nearly no impact. Sensitivity analyses show that these results are robust. Therefore, SGR-based algorithms for fault seal prediction cannot be expected to give good fault permeability predictions for seismic-scale faults at Njord.\n \n Thematic collection:\n This article is part of the Fault and top seals 2022 collection available at:\n https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/fault-and-top-seals-2022\n \n \n Supplementary material:\n https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6824325","PeriodicalId":49704,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Geoscience","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new approach to investigate the effect of burial depth and clay content on fault permeabilities applied at the Njord Field\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Müller, Christian Hermanrud, Haakon Fossen\",\"doi\":\"10.1144/petgeo2023-025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fault permeability prediction typically relies on empirical relationships between permeability and clay content or burial depth. Calibration of such methods relies on either core data or subsurface observations of fluid pressure and hydrocarbon contact offsets across faults. Published core data suggest that no relationships exist between host rock clay content and fault permeability for phyllosilicate-framework fault rocks, whereas published subsurface calibration data suggest otherwise. We here present a new method for calibration of fault rock permeabilities to subsurface pressure data. This approach is an analogue from electrical engineering to compute fault permeabilities across all major faults in a study area and optimise depth and clay content dependence of fault permeabilities. We tested this method at the Jurassic section of the Norwegian Njord Field area, where faults span the depth range of 2.7- 4.5 km and the lowest clay content in individual faults varies between 8.9 to 25.7%. The flow-restricting faults at Njord are phyllosilicate-framework fault rocks. Our modelling shows that fault rock permeability decreases with burial depth, whereas the clay content has nearly no impact. Sensitivity analyses show that these results are robust. Therefore, SGR-based algorithms for fault seal prediction cannot be expected to give good fault permeability predictions for seismic-scale faults at Njord.\\n \\n Thematic collection:\\n This article is part of the Fault and top seals 2022 collection available at:\\n https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/fault-and-top-seals-2022\\n \\n \\n Supplementary material:\\n https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6824325\",\"PeriodicalId\":49704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Petroleum Geoscience\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Petroleum Geoscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2023-025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Geoscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2023-025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

断层渗透率预测通常依赖于渗透率与粘土含量或埋深之间的经验关系。这些方法的校准要么依赖于岩心数据,要么依赖于流体压力的地下观测,要么依赖于断层上的油气接触偏移。公开的岩心数据表明,层状硅酸盐-格架断层岩石的主岩粘土含量与断层渗透率之间不存在关系,而公开的地下校准数据则相反。本文提出了一种将断层岩石渗透率与地下压力数据进行校正的新方法。该方法是一种类似于电气工程的方法,用于计算研究区域内所有主要断层的断层渗透率,并优化断层渗透率对深度和粘土含量的依赖。我们在挪威Njord油田的侏罗纪剖面测试了这种方法,该地区的断层深度范围为2.7- 4.5 km,单个断层的最低粘土含量在8.9 - 25.7%之间。Njord的限流断层为层状硅酸盐-格架断裂岩。我们的模型表明,断层岩渗透率随埋深而降低,而粘土含量几乎没有影响。敏感性分析表明,这些结果是稳健的。因此,不能指望基于sgr的断层封闭性预测算法能很好地预测Njord地震级断层的断层渗透率。专题合集:本文是故障和顶部密封2022合集的一部分,可在:https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/fault-and-top-seals-2022补充材料:https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6824325
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A new approach to investigate the effect of burial depth and clay content on fault permeabilities applied at the Njord Field
Fault permeability prediction typically relies on empirical relationships between permeability and clay content or burial depth. Calibration of such methods relies on either core data or subsurface observations of fluid pressure and hydrocarbon contact offsets across faults. Published core data suggest that no relationships exist between host rock clay content and fault permeability for phyllosilicate-framework fault rocks, whereas published subsurface calibration data suggest otherwise. We here present a new method for calibration of fault rock permeabilities to subsurface pressure data. This approach is an analogue from electrical engineering to compute fault permeabilities across all major faults in a study area and optimise depth and clay content dependence of fault permeabilities. We tested this method at the Jurassic section of the Norwegian Njord Field area, where faults span the depth range of 2.7- 4.5 km and the lowest clay content in individual faults varies between 8.9 to 25.7%. The flow-restricting faults at Njord are phyllosilicate-framework fault rocks. Our modelling shows that fault rock permeability decreases with burial depth, whereas the clay content has nearly no impact. Sensitivity analyses show that these results are robust. Therefore, SGR-based algorithms for fault seal prediction cannot be expected to give good fault permeability predictions for seismic-scale faults at Njord. Thematic collection: This article is part of the Fault and top seals 2022 collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/fault-and-top-seals-2022 Supplementary material: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6824325
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Petroleum Geoscience
Petroleum Geoscience 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Petroleum Geoscience is the international journal of geoenergy and applied earth science, and is co-owned by the Geological Society of London and the European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers (EAGE). Petroleum Geoscience transcends disciplinary boundaries and publishes a balanced mix of articles covering exploration, exploitation, appraisal, development and enhancement of sub-surface hydrocarbon resources and carbon repositories. The integration of disciplines in an applied context, whether for fluid production, carbon storage or related geoenergy applications, is a particular strength of the journal. Articles on enhancing exploration efficiency, lowering technological and environmental risk, and improving hydrocarbon recovery communicate the latest developments in sub-surface geoscience to a wide readership. Petroleum Geoscience provides a multidisciplinary forum for those engaged in the science and technology of the rock-related sub-surface disciplines. The journal reaches some 8000 individual subscribers, and a further 1100 institutional subscriptions provide global access to readers including geologists, geophysicists, petroleum and reservoir engineers, petrophysicists and geochemists in both academia and industry. The journal aims to share knowledge of reservoir geoscience and to reflect the international nature of its development.
期刊最新文献
The influence of sedimentary facies, mineralogy, and diagenesis on reservoir properties of the coal-bearing Upper Carboniferous of NW Germany Natural fractures at depth in shale reservoirs: new insights from the southern Sichuan Basin marine shales Petrographic and Petrophysical Characterization of Pre-salt Aptian Carbonate Reservoirs from The Santos Basin, Brazil Simultaneous Well Spacing and Completion Optimization Using Automated Machine Learning Approach. A Case Study of Marcellus Shale Reservoir in the North-Eastern United States Assessing the impact of hydrodynamics on capillary seal capacity: application of the Manzocchi & Childs model in trap analysis workflows
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1