公司报告、公司治理机制与税收侵略性:来自印度尼西亚的证据

IF 0.3 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI:10.24191/apmaj.v18i2-02
Ninuk Dewi Kesumaningrum, Imbarine Bujang, Ruhaini Muda, Norhayati Mohamed
{"title":"公司报告、公司治理机制与税收侵略性:来自印度尼西亚的证据","authors":"Ninuk Dewi Kesumaningrum, Imbarine Bujang, Ruhaini Muda, Norhayati Mohamed","doi":"10.24191/apmaj.v18i2-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to empirically analyze the relationship between corporate reporting, both mandatory (financial reporting) and voluntary (Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure) reporting, three corporate governance mechanisms (board size, independent board, and CEO duality), and tax aggressiveness in Indonesia. The study used a collected dataset of 121 public companies listed on the Indonesian stock exchange from 2016 to 2020. The data was collected from annual and sustainability reports published on the IDX and the company websites. The data was categorized based on classifications of non-financial industries because different characteristics and business cycles may influence tax aggressiveness decisions. Using the panel OLS approach, the research found that, in most industries, aggressive financial reporting positively relates, while CSR disclosures were negatively related to tax aggressiveness. The results also found that corporate governance mechanisms significantly related to tax aggressiveness in most industries. The findings suggest that board members, particularly independent boards with tax expertise and experience, can influence aggressive tax decisions. This study is the first to extract testing by industry classification, using mandatory financial reporting and voluntary CSR disclosures in Indonesia as indicators of corporate tax aggressiveness. The findings provide knowledge on company governance strategies to reduce aggressive tax actions. Keywords: aggressive financial reporting, corporate social responsibility, corporate governance mechanisms, tax aggressiveness","PeriodicalId":41923,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","volume":"2015 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate Reporting, Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Tax Aggressiveness: Evidence from Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Ninuk Dewi Kesumaningrum, Imbarine Bujang, Ruhaini Muda, Norhayati Mohamed\",\"doi\":\"10.24191/apmaj.v18i2-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to empirically analyze the relationship between corporate reporting, both mandatory (financial reporting) and voluntary (Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure) reporting, three corporate governance mechanisms (board size, independent board, and CEO duality), and tax aggressiveness in Indonesia. The study used a collected dataset of 121 public companies listed on the Indonesian stock exchange from 2016 to 2020. The data was collected from annual and sustainability reports published on the IDX and the company websites. The data was categorized based on classifications of non-financial industries because different characteristics and business cycles may influence tax aggressiveness decisions. Using the panel OLS approach, the research found that, in most industries, aggressive financial reporting positively relates, while CSR disclosures were negatively related to tax aggressiveness. The results also found that corporate governance mechanisms significantly related to tax aggressiveness in most industries. The findings suggest that board members, particularly independent boards with tax expertise and experience, can influence aggressive tax decisions. This study is the first to extract testing by industry classification, using mandatory financial reporting and voluntary CSR disclosures in Indonesia as indicators of corporate tax aggressiveness. The findings provide knowledge on company governance strategies to reduce aggressive tax actions. Keywords: aggressive financial reporting, corporate social responsibility, corporate governance mechanisms, tax aggressiveness\",\"PeriodicalId\":41923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal\",\"volume\":\"2015 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24191/apmaj.v18i2-02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/apmaj.v18i2-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在实证分析印尼公司报告(强制性(财务报告)和自愿性(企业社会责任(CSR)披露)报告、三种公司治理机制(董事会规模、独立董事会和CEO二元制)与税收侵略性之间的关系。该研究使用了2016年至2020年期间在印尼证券交易所上市的121家上市公司的数据集。这些数据是从IDX和公司网站上发布的年度和可持续发展报告中收集的。这些数据是根据非金融行业的分类进行分类的,因为不同的特征和商业周期可能会影响税收积极性决策。使用面板OLS方法,研究发现,在大多数行业,积极的财务报告正相关,而企业社会责任披露与税收积极负相关。结果还发现,在大多数行业中,公司治理机制与税收侵略性显著相关。研究结果表明,董事会成员,特别是具有税务专业知识和经验的独立董事会成员,可以影响激进的税务决策。本研究首次通过行业分类提取测试,使用印度尼西亚的强制性财务报告和自愿企业社会责任披露作为企业税收侵略性的指标。研究结果为公司治理策略提供了知识,以减少激进的税收行为。关键词:侵略性财务报告,企业社会责任,公司治理机制,税收侵略性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corporate Reporting, Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Tax Aggressiveness: Evidence from Indonesia
This study aimed to empirically analyze the relationship between corporate reporting, both mandatory (financial reporting) and voluntary (Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure) reporting, three corporate governance mechanisms (board size, independent board, and CEO duality), and tax aggressiveness in Indonesia. The study used a collected dataset of 121 public companies listed on the Indonesian stock exchange from 2016 to 2020. The data was collected from annual and sustainability reports published on the IDX and the company websites. The data was categorized based on classifications of non-financial industries because different characteristics and business cycles may influence tax aggressiveness decisions. Using the panel OLS approach, the research found that, in most industries, aggressive financial reporting positively relates, while CSR disclosures were negatively related to tax aggressiveness. The results also found that corporate governance mechanisms significantly related to tax aggressiveness in most industries. The findings suggest that board members, particularly independent boards with tax expertise and experience, can influence aggressive tax decisions. This study is the first to extract testing by industry classification, using mandatory financial reporting and voluntary CSR disclosures in Indonesia as indicators of corporate tax aggressiveness. The findings provide knowledge on company governance strategies to reduce aggressive tax actions. Keywords: aggressive financial reporting, corporate social responsibility, corporate governance mechanisms, tax aggressiveness
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
The Intention of Empowering Excellence on the Path to Professional Qualification in Sustainable Development and Governance Is Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure Value Enhancing? Evidence from Top 100 Companies Corporate Reporting, Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Tax Aggressiveness: Evidence from Indonesia Islamic Work Ethics, Good Corporate Governance Practices and Fraudulent Financial Statements Council’s Online Disclosure of Accountability Practices: Isomorphism Inquiries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1