Sachintha Tennekoon Mudiyanselage, Kushan Wijesundara, Srikanth Venkatesan, Saman De Silva, Ranjith Dissanayake, Panduka Neluwala
{"title":"混凝土面板堆石坝施工顺序及初始性能的意义","authors":"Sachintha Tennekoon Mudiyanselage, Kushan Wijesundara, Srikanth Venkatesan, Saman De Silva, Ranjith Dissanayake, Panduka Neluwala","doi":"10.1080/13287982.2023.2268288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finite Element Model simulations are widely used to validate experimental and field observations. Out of these, modelling and comparing the stability of dams under various loading conditions presents significant challenges for researchers and practitioners, none more than the concrete-faced rockfill dams that are present in Australia (e.g. Cethana dam) and around the globe. A review shows that the construction sequence of such dams has not been incorporated in the initial configuration of concrete-faced rockfill dams. In this research, static analysis has been conducted for 2D and 3D finite element models of the Kotmale concrete-faced rockfill dam (CFRD) with and without the construction stage. Both 2D and 3D analysis of the case study dam using MIDAS FEA NX software and static analysis have been conducted. A linear elastic material model and a nonlinear material model (Duncan and Chang EB Model) were used to model the rockfill material. The resulting deformations were compared with the in-situ measurements to identify the accuracy of the developed cases. Results show that construction stage inclusion and the nonlinear material model agree well with the in-situ measurements, warranting the need for such advancements in Finite Element Analysis. Such an inclusion can model future settlement behaviour reasonably well, which can lead to the development of appropriate management measures.","PeriodicalId":45617,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Significance of construction sequence and the initial behaviour in concrete-faced rockfill dams\",\"authors\":\"Sachintha Tennekoon Mudiyanselage, Kushan Wijesundara, Srikanth Venkatesan, Saman De Silva, Ranjith Dissanayake, Panduka Neluwala\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13287982.2023.2268288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Finite Element Model simulations are widely used to validate experimental and field observations. Out of these, modelling and comparing the stability of dams under various loading conditions presents significant challenges for researchers and practitioners, none more than the concrete-faced rockfill dams that are present in Australia (e.g. Cethana dam) and around the globe. A review shows that the construction sequence of such dams has not been incorporated in the initial configuration of concrete-faced rockfill dams. In this research, static analysis has been conducted for 2D and 3D finite element models of the Kotmale concrete-faced rockfill dam (CFRD) with and without the construction stage. Both 2D and 3D analysis of the case study dam using MIDAS FEA NX software and static analysis have been conducted. A linear elastic material model and a nonlinear material model (Duncan and Chang EB Model) were used to model the rockfill material. The resulting deformations were compared with the in-situ measurements to identify the accuracy of the developed cases. Results show that construction stage inclusion and the nonlinear material model agree well with the in-situ measurements, warranting the need for such advancements in Finite Element Analysis. Such an inclusion can model future settlement behaviour reasonably well, which can lead to the development of appropriate management measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2023.2268288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2023.2268288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Significance of construction sequence and the initial behaviour in concrete-faced rockfill dams
Finite Element Model simulations are widely used to validate experimental and field observations. Out of these, modelling and comparing the stability of dams under various loading conditions presents significant challenges for researchers and practitioners, none more than the concrete-faced rockfill dams that are present in Australia (e.g. Cethana dam) and around the globe. A review shows that the construction sequence of such dams has not been incorporated in the initial configuration of concrete-faced rockfill dams. In this research, static analysis has been conducted for 2D and 3D finite element models of the Kotmale concrete-faced rockfill dam (CFRD) with and without the construction stage. Both 2D and 3D analysis of the case study dam using MIDAS FEA NX software and static analysis have been conducted. A linear elastic material model and a nonlinear material model (Duncan and Chang EB Model) were used to model the rockfill material. The resulting deformations were compared with the in-situ measurements to identify the accuracy of the developed cases. Results show that construction stage inclusion and the nonlinear material model agree well with the in-situ measurements, warranting the need for such advancements in Finite Element Analysis. Such an inclusion can model future settlement behaviour reasonably well, which can lead to the development of appropriate management measures.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.