考虑试验地块和降雨模式的模拟降雨的水土流失

IF 2.9 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Systems Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.3390/soilsystems7040087
Daniel Fonseca de Carvalho, Amanda Sales Alves, Pietro Menezes Sanchez Macedo, Paulo Tarso Sanches de Oliveira, Nivaldo Schultz
{"title":"考虑试验地块和降雨模式的模拟降雨的水土流失","authors":"Daniel Fonseca de Carvalho, Amanda Sales Alves, Pietro Menezes Sanchez Macedo, Paulo Tarso Sanches de Oliveira, Nivaldo Schultz","doi":"10.3390/soilsystems7040087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rainfall simulators are important pieces of equipment to investigate hydrological processes and soil erosion. Here, we investigated the operational characteristics, the rainfall characteristics, and the soil erosion process under collecting plots and rainfall patterns using the InfiAsper simulator. We evaluated the standard plot of the simulator in a rectangular shape (1.0 × 0.7 m), as well as a circular plot (0.8 m diameter), and four precipitation patterns, characterized as advanced (AV), intermediate (IN), delayed (DL), and constant (CT). In the laboratory, uniformity and water consumption tests were carried out for shutter-disk rotations from 138 to 804 rpm, and in the field, simulated rains were applied on a Dystric Acrisol. Rains with different patterns were simulated and presented a uniformity coefficient above 83% for the circular plot and 78.2% for the rectangular plot. The soil erosion varied as a function of the precipitation patterns and, to a lesser extent, according to the shape of the experimental plot. However, runoff and soil loss in AV were 2.1 and 3.5 times greater when using a circular plot. Concerning IN and DL, the length of the rectangular plot may have influenced the formation of small furrows throughout most of the simulated rainfall event, providing greater runoff (13.1 mm) and soil loss (13.6 g m−2). The results obtained are promising, but plots with different shapes associated with rainfall patterns simulated by InfiAsper must be evaluated in other classes and soil use and cover conditions.","PeriodicalId":21908,"journal":{"name":"Soil Systems","volume":"129-132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil and Water Losses with Simulated Rainfall Considering Experimental Plots and Rainfall Patterns\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Fonseca de Carvalho, Amanda Sales Alves, Pietro Menezes Sanchez Macedo, Paulo Tarso Sanches de Oliveira, Nivaldo Schultz\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/soilsystems7040087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rainfall simulators are important pieces of equipment to investigate hydrological processes and soil erosion. Here, we investigated the operational characteristics, the rainfall characteristics, and the soil erosion process under collecting plots and rainfall patterns using the InfiAsper simulator. We evaluated the standard plot of the simulator in a rectangular shape (1.0 × 0.7 m), as well as a circular plot (0.8 m diameter), and four precipitation patterns, characterized as advanced (AV), intermediate (IN), delayed (DL), and constant (CT). In the laboratory, uniformity and water consumption tests were carried out for shutter-disk rotations from 138 to 804 rpm, and in the field, simulated rains were applied on a Dystric Acrisol. Rains with different patterns were simulated and presented a uniformity coefficient above 83% for the circular plot and 78.2% for the rectangular plot. The soil erosion varied as a function of the precipitation patterns and, to a lesser extent, according to the shape of the experimental plot. However, runoff and soil loss in AV were 2.1 and 3.5 times greater when using a circular plot. Concerning IN and DL, the length of the rectangular plot may have influenced the formation of small furrows throughout most of the simulated rainfall event, providing greater runoff (13.1 mm) and soil loss (13.6 g m−2). The results obtained are promising, but plots with different shapes associated with rainfall patterns simulated by InfiAsper must be evaluated in other classes and soil use and cover conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Systems\",\"volume\":\"129-132 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems7040087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems7040087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

降雨模拟器是研究水文过程和土壤侵蚀的重要设备。在此基础上,利用InfiAsper模拟系统研究了采集区的运行特征、降雨特征、土壤侵蚀过程和降雨模式。我们评估了模拟器的矩形标准图(1.0 × 0.7 m)和圆形图(0.8 m直径),以及四种降水模式,特征为高级(AV),中级(in),延迟(DL)和恒定(CT)。在实验室中,对快门盘从138转至804转进行了均匀性和耗水量测试,并在田间对Dystric Acrisol进行了模拟降雨。圆形样地和矩形样地的均匀性系数分别为83%和78.2%。土壤侵蚀随降水模式的变化而变化,在较小程度上受试验田形状的影响。然而,当使用圆形地块时,AV的径流量和土壤流失量分别是2.1和3.5倍。在大部分模拟降雨事件中,矩形地块的长度可能影响了小沟槽的形成,提供了更大的径流(13.1 mm)和土壤流失(13.6 g m−2)。获得的结果是有希望的,但是与infasper模拟的降雨模式相关的不同形状的地块必须在其他类别和土壤利用和覆盖条件下进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Soil and Water Losses with Simulated Rainfall Considering Experimental Plots and Rainfall Patterns
Rainfall simulators are important pieces of equipment to investigate hydrological processes and soil erosion. Here, we investigated the operational characteristics, the rainfall characteristics, and the soil erosion process under collecting plots and rainfall patterns using the InfiAsper simulator. We evaluated the standard plot of the simulator in a rectangular shape (1.0 × 0.7 m), as well as a circular plot (0.8 m diameter), and four precipitation patterns, characterized as advanced (AV), intermediate (IN), delayed (DL), and constant (CT). In the laboratory, uniformity and water consumption tests were carried out for shutter-disk rotations from 138 to 804 rpm, and in the field, simulated rains were applied on a Dystric Acrisol. Rains with different patterns were simulated and presented a uniformity coefficient above 83% for the circular plot and 78.2% for the rectangular plot. The soil erosion varied as a function of the precipitation patterns and, to a lesser extent, according to the shape of the experimental plot. However, runoff and soil loss in AV were 2.1 and 3.5 times greater when using a circular plot. Concerning IN and DL, the length of the rectangular plot may have influenced the formation of small furrows throughout most of the simulated rainfall event, providing greater runoff (13.1 mm) and soil loss (13.6 g m−2). The results obtained are promising, but plots with different shapes associated with rainfall patterns simulated by InfiAsper must be evaluated in other classes and soil use and cover conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Systems
Soil Systems Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth-Surface Processes
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Structural Shifts in the Soil Prokaryotic Communities Marking the Podzol-Forming Process on Sand Dumps Soil Phytomining: Recent Developments—A Review Selenium and Heavy Metals in Soil–Plant System in a Hydrogeochemical Province with High Selenium Content in Groundwater: A Case Study of the Lower Dniester Valley Tillage and Cover Crop Systems Alter Soil Particle Size Distribution in Raised-Bed-and-Furrow Row-Crop Agroecosystems Shifts in Soil Bacterial Communities under Three-Year Fertilization Management and Multiple Cropping Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1