基于shapley的风险排名:一些理论上的考虑

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance International Review of Economics Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1007/s12232-023-00434-7
Tobias Hiller
{"title":"基于shapley的风险排名:一些理论上的考虑","authors":"Tobias Hiller","doi":"10.1007/s12232-023-00434-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this note, we enhance the analysis done by Auer and Hiller (Int J Finance Econ 24(2):884–889, 2019; Manag Decis Econ 42(4):876–884, 2021). Whereas their articles uses several simulation settings to illustrate that cooperative game theory may have the potential to solve the low-risk puzzle, we calculate for the three-asset case the conditions for partial ranking corrections between assets. Hence, our note could be interpreted as theoretical counterpart to Auer and Hiller (Int J Finance Econ 24(2):884–889, 2019; Manag Decis Econ 42(4):876–884, 2021).","PeriodicalId":40021,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shapley-based risk rankings: some theoretical considerations\",\"authors\":\"Tobias Hiller\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12232-023-00434-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this note, we enhance the analysis done by Auer and Hiller (Int J Finance Econ 24(2):884–889, 2019; Manag Decis Econ 42(4):876–884, 2021). Whereas their articles uses several simulation settings to illustrate that cooperative game theory may have the potential to solve the low-risk puzzle, we calculate for the three-asset case the conditions for partial ranking corrections between assets. Hence, our note could be interpreted as theoretical counterpart to Auer and Hiller (Int J Finance Econ 24(2):884–889, 2019; Manag Decis Econ 42(4):876–884, 2021).\",\"PeriodicalId\":40021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Economics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-023-00434-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-023-00434-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们加强了Auer和Hiller所做的分析(Int J Finance economics 24(2): 884-889, 2019;管理决策经济42(4):876-884,2021)。尽管他们的文章使用了几个模拟设置来说明合作博弈论可能有解决低风险难题的潜力,但我们计算了三资产情况下资产之间部分排名修正的条件。因此,我们的报告可以解释为Auer和Hiller的理论对应物(Int J Finance economics 24(2): 884-889, 2019;管理决策经济42(4):876-884,2021)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shapley-based risk rankings: some theoretical considerations
Abstract In this note, we enhance the analysis done by Auer and Hiller (Int J Finance Econ 24(2):884–889, 2019; Manag Decis Econ 42(4):876–884, 2021). Whereas their articles uses several simulation settings to illustrate that cooperative game theory may have the potential to solve the low-risk puzzle, we calculate for the three-asset case the conditions for partial ranking corrections between assets. Hence, our note could be interpreted as theoretical counterpart to Auer and Hiller (Int J Finance Econ 24(2):884–889, 2019; Manag Decis Econ 42(4):876–884, 2021).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Review of Economics
International Review of Economics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: International Review of Economics - Journal of Civil Economy (IREC) covers a broad range of macro- and microeconomic topics, and showcases high-quality empirical, theoretical and policy-oriented contributions. In particular, IREC welcomes papers focused on the analysis of social interactions, wellbeing, welfare and happiness, capabilities, reciprocity, trust, relational goods, formal and informal institutions, law and economics, prizes and incentives, economics and philosophy, economic theology, the history of economic thought, non-profit organizations, and social economy. Civil Economy refers to a 18th-century Southern European tradition, which views the market as a pre-condition for civilization. Today, Civil Economy denotes a special focus on the ‘civil’ and ethical dimensions of economic issues, and on pursuing the common good in the economic domain. Officially cited as: Int Rev Econ
期刊最新文献
Impact of mobile financial services on financial inclusion: empirical insights from Kenya Tax morale: a global scoping review from the cultural approach to economics Causality between stock indices and cryptocurrencies before and during the Russo–Ukrainian war Personal income tax, redistribution and income inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa Reconnoitering FinTech's moderating effect on the determinants of women's financial literacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1