床边超声测量视神经鞘直径在急诊科诊断颅内高压中的准确性

IF 0.4 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Care Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-23 DOI:10.4081/ecj.2023.11333
Chiara Busti, Matteo Marcosignori, Francesco Marchetti, Giuseppe Batori, Laura Giovenali, Francesco Corea, Giuseppe Calabrò, Manuel Monti, Federico Germini
{"title":"床边超声测量视神经鞘直径在急诊科诊断颅内高压中的准确性","authors":"Chiara Busti, Matteo Marcosignori, Francesco Marchetti, Giuseppe Batori, Laura Giovenali, Francesco Corea, Giuseppe Calabrò, Manuel Monti, Federico Germini","doi":"10.4081/ecj.2023.11333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (US ONSD) has been proposed as a method to diagnose elevated intracranial pressure (EICP), but the optimal threshold is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of US ONSD, as compared to head computed tomography (CT), in detecting EICP of both traumatic and non-traumatic origin. We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study. Patients presenting to the emergency department with a suspect of traumatic or non-traumatic brain injury, referred for an urgent head CT, underwent US ONSD measurement. A US ONSD ≥5.5 mm was considered positive. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated for three ONSD cut-offs: 5.5 (primary outcome), 5.0, and 6.0 mm. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was also generated and the area under the ROC curve calculated. Ninetynine patients were enrolled. The CT was positive in 15% of cases and the US ONSD was positive in all of these, achieving a sensitivity of 100% [95% confidence interval (CI) 78; 100] and a negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI 79; 100). The CT was negative in 85% of cases, while the US ONSD was positive in 69% of these, achieving a specificity of 19% (95% CI 11; 29) and a positive predictive value of 18% (95% CI 11; 28). The US ONSD, with a 5.5 mm cut-off, might safely be used to rule out EICP in patients with traumatic and non-traumatic brain injury in the ED. In limited-resources contexts, a negative US ONSD could allow emergency physicians to rule out EICP in low-risk patients, deferring the head CT.","PeriodicalId":51984,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Care Journal","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of bedside sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter for intracranial hypertension diagnosis in the emergency department\",\"authors\":\"Chiara Busti, Matteo Marcosignori, Francesco Marchetti, Giuseppe Batori, Laura Giovenali, Francesco Corea, Giuseppe Calabrò, Manuel Monti, Federico Germini\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/ecj.2023.11333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (US ONSD) has been proposed as a method to diagnose elevated intracranial pressure (EICP), but the optimal threshold is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of US ONSD, as compared to head computed tomography (CT), in detecting EICP of both traumatic and non-traumatic origin. We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study. Patients presenting to the emergency department with a suspect of traumatic or non-traumatic brain injury, referred for an urgent head CT, underwent US ONSD measurement. A US ONSD ≥5.5 mm was considered positive. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated for three ONSD cut-offs: 5.5 (primary outcome), 5.0, and 6.0 mm. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was also generated and the area under the ROC curve calculated. Ninetynine patients were enrolled. The CT was positive in 15% of cases and the US ONSD was positive in all of these, achieving a sensitivity of 100% [95% confidence interval (CI) 78; 100] and a negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI 79; 100). The CT was negative in 85% of cases, while the US ONSD was positive in 69% of these, achieving a specificity of 19% (95% CI 11; 29) and a positive predictive value of 18% (95% CI 11; 28). The US ONSD, with a 5.5 mm cut-off, might safely be used to rule out EICP in patients with traumatic and non-traumatic brain injury in the ED. In limited-resources contexts, a negative US ONSD could allow emergency physicians to rule out EICP in low-risk patients, deferring the head CT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Care Journal\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Care Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2023.11333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Care Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2023.11333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

超声测量视神经鞘直径(US ONSD)已被提出作为诊断颅内压升高(EICP)的一种方法,但最佳阈值尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估US ONSD与头部计算机断层扫描(CT)相比在检测外伤性和非外伤性EICP方面的准确性。我们进行了一项前瞻性、横断面、多中心研究。疑似创伤性或非创伤性脑损伤的患者就诊于急诊科,转介进行紧急头部CT检查,接受US ONSD测量。US ONSD≥5.5 mm为阳性。计算三个ONSD临界值的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及阳性和阴性似然比:5.5(主要结局)、5.0和6.0 mm。生成受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,并计算ROC曲线下面积。99名患者入组。15%的病例CT为阳性,所有病例US ONSD均为阳性,敏感性达到100%[95%可信区间(CI) 78;100]和100%的阴性预测值(95% CI 79;100)。85%的病例CT为阴性,而其中69%的病例US ONSD为阳性,特异性为19% (95% CI 11;29),阳性预测值为18% (95% CI 11;28)。US ONSD具有5.5 mm的临界值,可以安全地用于排除急诊科创伤性和非创伤性脑损伤患者的EICP。在资源有限的情况下,US ONSD阴性可以让急诊医生排除低风险患者的EICP,推迟头部CT检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy of bedside sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter for intracranial hypertension diagnosis in the emergency department
Ultrasound measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (US ONSD) has been proposed as a method to diagnose elevated intracranial pressure (EICP), but the optimal threshold is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of US ONSD, as compared to head computed tomography (CT), in detecting EICP of both traumatic and non-traumatic origin. We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study. Patients presenting to the emergency department with a suspect of traumatic or non-traumatic brain injury, referred for an urgent head CT, underwent US ONSD measurement. A US ONSD ≥5.5 mm was considered positive. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated for three ONSD cut-offs: 5.5 (primary outcome), 5.0, and 6.0 mm. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was also generated and the area under the ROC curve calculated. Ninetynine patients were enrolled. The CT was positive in 15% of cases and the US ONSD was positive in all of these, achieving a sensitivity of 100% [95% confidence interval (CI) 78; 100] and a negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI 79; 100). The CT was negative in 85% of cases, while the US ONSD was positive in 69% of these, achieving a specificity of 19% (95% CI 11; 29) and a positive predictive value of 18% (95% CI 11; 28). The US ONSD, with a 5.5 mm cut-off, might safely be used to rule out EICP in patients with traumatic and non-traumatic brain injury in the ED. In limited-resources contexts, a negative US ONSD could allow emergency physicians to rule out EICP in low-risk patients, deferring the head CT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Care Journal
Emergency Care Journal EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
60.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Painful burning lesions on the chest wall of a patient with advanced breast cancer What does a floating mass in a young patient's heart do? A systematic review of the factors influencing retention or turnover intention among emergency personnel in epidemics Estimated plasma volume status can help identify patients with sepsis at risk of death within 30 days in the emergency department A small lump in the abdomen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1