调查假牙佩戴者所面临的挑战,如假牙的稳定性、舒适性和美观性,以及他们对不同类型假牙的偏好

RavindraMandanbhai Chavda, RahulkumarR Patel, Vipul Munia, Mahek Pandya
{"title":"调查假牙佩戴者所面临的挑战,如假牙的稳定性、舒适性和美观性,以及他们对不同类型假牙的偏好","authors":"RavindraMandanbhai Chavda, RahulkumarR Patel, Vipul Munia, Mahek Pandya","doi":"10.4103/ijpcdr.ijpcdr_20_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Dentures are common prosthetic devices used to replace missing teeth; however, wearers often encounter challenges related to stability, comfort, and esthetics. Understanding these challenges and preferences for different denture types is crucial for improving oral health outcomes and quality of life. Materials and Methods: We conducted a comprehensive study involving 500 denture wearers. Participants were assessed for denture stability, comfort, and esthetics using standardized measures. In addition, their preferences for various denture types, including conventional complete dentures, implant-supported overdentures, and partial dentures, were explored through structured interviews. Results: In this study, 25% of participants found denture stability to be “very challenging,” 40% considered it “somewhat challenging,” and 35% did not find it challenging. Twenty percent of participants found denture comfort to be “very challenging,” 36% considered it “somewhat challenging,” and 44% did not find it challenging. In the study, 15% of participants found denture esthetics to be “very challenging,” 30% considered it “somewhat challenging,” and 55% did not find it challenging. Thirty percent of participants prefer implant-supported dentures, while 70% do not prefer them. Conclusions: Denture wearers commonly experience challenges associated with stability, comfort, and esthetics. Preferences for denture types differ, highlighting the need for personalized treatment options based on individual needs and circumstances.","PeriodicalId":14257,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Preventive and Clinical Dental Research","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the challenges faced by denture wearers, such as denture stability, comfort, and esthetics, and their preferences for different types of dentures\",\"authors\":\"RavindraMandanbhai Chavda, RahulkumarR Patel, Vipul Munia, Mahek Pandya\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijpcdr.ijpcdr_20_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Dentures are common prosthetic devices used to replace missing teeth; however, wearers often encounter challenges related to stability, comfort, and esthetics. Understanding these challenges and preferences for different denture types is crucial for improving oral health outcomes and quality of life. Materials and Methods: We conducted a comprehensive study involving 500 denture wearers. Participants were assessed for denture stability, comfort, and esthetics using standardized measures. In addition, their preferences for various denture types, including conventional complete dentures, implant-supported overdentures, and partial dentures, were explored through structured interviews. Results: In this study, 25% of participants found denture stability to be “very challenging,” 40% considered it “somewhat challenging,” and 35% did not find it challenging. Twenty percent of participants found denture comfort to be “very challenging,” 36% considered it “somewhat challenging,” and 44% did not find it challenging. In the study, 15% of participants found denture esthetics to be “very challenging,” 30% considered it “somewhat challenging,” and 55% did not find it challenging. Thirty percent of participants prefer implant-supported dentures, while 70% do not prefer them. Conclusions: Denture wearers commonly experience challenges associated with stability, comfort, and esthetics. Preferences for denture types differ, highlighting the need for personalized treatment options based on individual needs and circumstances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Preventive and Clinical Dental Research\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Preventive and Clinical Dental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpcdr.ijpcdr_20_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Preventive and Clinical Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpcdr.ijpcdr_20_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating the challenges faced by denture wearers, such as denture stability, comfort, and esthetics, and their preferences for different types of dentures
Background: Dentures are common prosthetic devices used to replace missing teeth; however, wearers often encounter challenges related to stability, comfort, and esthetics. Understanding these challenges and preferences for different denture types is crucial for improving oral health outcomes and quality of life. Materials and Methods: We conducted a comprehensive study involving 500 denture wearers. Participants were assessed for denture stability, comfort, and esthetics using standardized measures. In addition, their preferences for various denture types, including conventional complete dentures, implant-supported overdentures, and partial dentures, were explored through structured interviews. Results: In this study, 25% of participants found denture stability to be “very challenging,” 40% considered it “somewhat challenging,” and 35% did not find it challenging. Twenty percent of participants found denture comfort to be “very challenging,” 36% considered it “somewhat challenging,” and 44% did not find it challenging. In the study, 15% of participants found denture esthetics to be “very challenging,” 30% considered it “somewhat challenging,” and 55% did not find it challenging. Thirty percent of participants prefer implant-supported dentures, while 70% do not prefer them. Conclusions: Denture wearers commonly experience challenges associated with stability, comfort, and esthetics. Preferences for denture types differ, highlighting the need for personalized treatment options based on individual needs and circumstances.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative evaluation of hemoglobin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and differential leukocyte count: Anemia in gingivitis and periodontitis patients in Kerala population – A cross-sectional study Congenital granular cell tumors Early prosthetic management of mandible using interim guidance appliances in hemimandibulectomy patients: A case series Comparative evaluation of conventional and diode laser-assisted gingival curettage in shallow suprabony periodontal pocket – Three months follow-up of a randomized clinical trial Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on treatment and psychology of patients undergoing orthodontic treatment: A cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1