C. Rajendran , Tushar Sonar , Mikhail Ivanov , Ch. Sandeep , C. Shanthi , Naveen Kumar Gurajala , K. Balachandar , Jinyang Xu
{"title":"提高脉冲 CMT-MIG 焊接高强度 AA2014-T6 合金接头的拉伸性能:焊后热处理的影响","authors":"C. Rajendran , Tushar Sonar , Mikhail Ivanov , Ch. Sandeep , C. Shanthi , Naveen Kumar Gurajala , K. Balachandar , Jinyang Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlmm.2023.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The main objective of this investigation is to study the effect of post weld heat treatments (PWHTs) on tensile properties, hardness, and microstructure of pulsed CMT–MIG (cold metal transfer arc–metal inert gas) welded AA20214-T6 aluminum alloy joints. The welded joints were subjected to PWHT of artificial aging (AA), solution annealing treatment (ST) and ST + aging (STA). The tensile properties and microhardness of joints were evaluated. The microstructure of joints was studied using optical microscope (OM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM). The fractured surface of tensile specimens was analyzed using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results showed that the tensile properties and hardness of as welded and PWHT joints are inferior compared to base metal (BM). This mainly refers to the microstructural heterogeneity in different regions of joints and softening of heat affected zone (HAZ) induced by the weld thermal cycle. The PWHTs of AA and ST did not show significant effect on tensile strength and hardness of AW joints. However, the slight reduction in elongation was observed in AA and ST joints. The STA joints showed higher joint efficiency of 71.6%, than other joints by compromising on the elongation. This refers to the greater precipitation of hardening precipitates in STA joints compared to AA and ST joints. It exhibited the higher tensile and yield strength of 326 MPa and 266 MPa and the lowest elongation of 3.8%. The STA joints showed 28.35%, 38.28% and 57.77% reduction in tensile strength, yield strength and elongation compared to BM respectively. All the tensile specimens of joints failed in HAZ owing to the lower hardness. This refers to dissolution of precipitates in HAZ. However, the HAZ softening is less severe in STA joints than AW, AA, and ST joints.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52306,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture","volume":"7 2","pages":"Pages 344-352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588840423000525/pdfft?md5=ba796a0c965d41aa553dc5746bd43037&pid=1-s2.0-S2588840423000525-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing tensile properties of pulsed CMT–MIG welded high strength AA2014-T6 alloy joints: Effect of post weld heat treatment\",\"authors\":\"C. Rajendran , Tushar Sonar , Mikhail Ivanov , Ch. Sandeep , C. Shanthi , Naveen Kumar Gurajala , K. Balachandar , Jinyang Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijlmm.2023.10.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The main objective of this investigation is to study the effect of post weld heat treatments (PWHTs) on tensile properties, hardness, and microstructure of pulsed CMT–MIG (cold metal transfer arc–metal inert gas) welded AA20214-T6 aluminum alloy joints. The welded joints were subjected to PWHT of artificial aging (AA), solution annealing treatment (ST) and ST + aging (STA). The tensile properties and microhardness of joints were evaluated. The microstructure of joints was studied using optical microscope (OM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM). The fractured surface of tensile specimens was analyzed using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results showed that the tensile properties and hardness of as welded and PWHT joints are inferior compared to base metal (BM). This mainly refers to the microstructural heterogeneity in different regions of joints and softening of heat affected zone (HAZ) induced by the weld thermal cycle. The PWHTs of AA and ST did not show significant effect on tensile strength and hardness of AW joints. However, the slight reduction in elongation was observed in AA and ST joints. The STA joints showed higher joint efficiency of 71.6%, than other joints by compromising on the elongation. This refers to the greater precipitation of hardening precipitates in STA joints compared to AA and ST joints. It exhibited the higher tensile and yield strength of 326 MPa and 266 MPa and the lowest elongation of 3.8%. The STA joints showed 28.35%, 38.28% and 57.77% reduction in tensile strength, yield strength and elongation compared to BM respectively. All the tensile specimens of joints failed in HAZ owing to the lower hardness. This refers to dissolution of precipitates in HAZ. However, the HAZ softening is less severe in STA joints than AW, AA, and ST joints.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 344-352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588840423000525/pdfft?md5=ba796a0c965d41aa553dc5746bd43037&pid=1-s2.0-S2588840423000525-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588840423000525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588840423000525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的主要目的是研究焊后热处理(PWHT)对脉冲 CMT-MIG(冷金属转移电弧-金属惰性气体)焊接 AA20214-T6 铝合金接头的拉伸性能、硬度和微观结构的影响。焊接接头分别经过了人工时效(AA)、固溶退火处理(ST)和 ST + 时效(STA)的 PWHT 处理。对焊点的拉伸性能和显微硬度进行了评估。使用光学显微镜(OM)和透射电子显微镜(TEM)研究了接头的微观结构。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析了拉伸试样的断裂表面。结果表明,与母材(BM)相比,焊接接头和 PWHT 接头的拉伸性能和硬度较差。这主要是指焊点不同区域的微观结构异质性以及焊接热循环引起的热影响区(HAZ)软化。AA 和 ST 的 PWHT 对 AW 接头的拉伸强度和硬度没有明显影响。不过,AA 和 ST 焊点的伸长率略有降低。与其他接头相比,STA 接头的接头效率更高,达到 71.6%,但伸长率却有所降低。这是因为与 AA 和 ST 接头相比,STA 接头中析出的硬化析出物更多。它的拉伸强度和屈服强度分别为 326 兆帕和 266 兆帕,伸长率最低,仅为 3.8%。与 BM 相比,STA 接头的抗拉强度、屈服强度和伸长率分别降低了 28.35%、38.28% 和 57.77%。由于硬度较低,所有接头的拉伸试样都在热影响区失效。这指的是 HAZ 中沉淀物的溶解。不过,与 AW、AA 和 ST 接头相比,STA 接头的 HAZ 软化程度较轻。
Enhancing tensile properties of pulsed CMT–MIG welded high strength AA2014-T6 alloy joints: Effect of post weld heat treatment
The main objective of this investigation is to study the effect of post weld heat treatments (PWHTs) on tensile properties, hardness, and microstructure of pulsed CMT–MIG (cold metal transfer arc–metal inert gas) welded AA20214-T6 aluminum alloy joints. The welded joints were subjected to PWHT of artificial aging (AA), solution annealing treatment (ST) and ST + aging (STA). The tensile properties and microhardness of joints were evaluated. The microstructure of joints was studied using optical microscope (OM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM). The fractured surface of tensile specimens was analyzed using scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results showed that the tensile properties and hardness of as welded and PWHT joints are inferior compared to base metal (BM). This mainly refers to the microstructural heterogeneity in different regions of joints and softening of heat affected zone (HAZ) induced by the weld thermal cycle. The PWHTs of AA and ST did not show significant effect on tensile strength and hardness of AW joints. However, the slight reduction in elongation was observed in AA and ST joints. The STA joints showed higher joint efficiency of 71.6%, than other joints by compromising on the elongation. This refers to the greater precipitation of hardening precipitates in STA joints compared to AA and ST joints. It exhibited the higher tensile and yield strength of 326 MPa and 266 MPa and the lowest elongation of 3.8%. The STA joints showed 28.35%, 38.28% and 57.77% reduction in tensile strength, yield strength and elongation compared to BM respectively. All the tensile specimens of joints failed in HAZ owing to the lower hardness. This refers to dissolution of precipitates in HAZ. However, the HAZ softening is less severe in STA joints than AW, AA, and ST joints.