一种新型便携式移动MRI:与已建立的低场术中MRI系统的比较

Sharon Bossert, Prashin Unadkat, Kevin N. Sheth, Gordon Sze, Michael Schulder
{"title":"一种新型便携式移动MRI:与已建立的低场术中MRI系统的比较","authors":"Sharon Bossert, Prashin Unadkat, Kevin N. Sheth, Gordon Sze, Michael Schulder","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1760857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) using low-magnet field strength has unique advantages for intraoperative use. We compared a novel, compact, portable MR imaging system to an established intraoperative 0.15 T system to assess potential utility in intracranial neurosurgery. Methods Brain images were acquired with a 0.15 T intraoperative MRI (iMRI) system and a 0.064 T portable MR system. Five healthy volunteers were scanned. Individual sequences were rated on a 5-point (1 to 5) scale for six categories: contrast, resolution, coverage, noise, artifacts, and geometry. Results Overall, the 0.064 T images (M = 3.4, SD = 0.1) had statistically higher ratings than the 0.15 T images (M = 2.4, SD = 0.2) (p < 0.01). All comparable sequences (T1, T2, T2 FLAIR and SSFP) were rated significantly higher on the 0.064 T and were rated 1.2 points (SD = 0.3) higher than 0.15 T scanner, with the T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences showing the largest increment on the 0.064 T with an average rating difference of 1.5 points (SD = 0.2). Scanning time for the 0.064 T system obtained images more quickly and encompassed a larger field of view than the 0.15 T system. Conclusions A novel, portable 0.064 T self-shielding MRI system under ideal conditions provided images of comparable quality or better and faster acquisition times than those provided by the already well-established 0.15 T iMR system. These results suggest that the 0.064 T MRI has the potential to be adapted for intraoperative use for intracranial neurosurgery.","PeriodicalId":94300,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Portable, Mobile MRI: Comparison with an Established Low-Field Intraoperative MRI System\",\"authors\":\"Sharon Bossert, Prashin Unadkat, Kevin N. Sheth, Gordon Sze, Michael Schulder\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1760857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) using low-magnet field strength has unique advantages for intraoperative use. We compared a novel, compact, portable MR imaging system to an established intraoperative 0.15 T system to assess potential utility in intracranial neurosurgery. Methods Brain images were acquired with a 0.15 T intraoperative MRI (iMRI) system and a 0.064 T portable MR system. Five healthy volunteers were scanned. Individual sequences were rated on a 5-point (1 to 5) scale for six categories: contrast, resolution, coverage, noise, artifacts, and geometry. Results Overall, the 0.064 T images (M = 3.4, SD = 0.1) had statistically higher ratings than the 0.15 T images (M = 2.4, SD = 0.2) (p < 0.01). All comparable sequences (T1, T2, T2 FLAIR and SSFP) were rated significantly higher on the 0.064 T and were rated 1.2 points (SD = 0.3) higher than 0.15 T scanner, with the T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences showing the largest increment on the 0.064 T with an average rating difference of 1.5 points (SD = 0.2). Scanning time for the 0.064 T system obtained images more quickly and encompassed a larger field of view than the 0.15 T system. Conclusions A novel, portable 0.064 T self-shielding MRI system under ideal conditions provided images of comparable quality or better and faster acquisition times than those provided by the already well-established 0.15 T iMR system. These results suggest that the 0.064 T MRI has the potential to be adapted for intraoperative use for intracranial neurosurgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1760857\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1760857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景低磁场强度的MRI(磁共振成像)在术中应用具有独特的优势。我们比较了一种新型、紧凑、便携的磁共振成像系统和一种成熟的术中0.15 T磁共振成像系统,以评估其在颅内神经外科手术中的潜在效用。方法采用0.15 T术中MRI (iMRI)系统和0.064 T便携式MR系统采集脑图像。对5名健康志愿者进行了扫描。对单个序列进行5分(1到5)评分,分为六个类别:对比度,分辨率,覆盖率,噪声,伪影和几何形状。结果总体而言,0.064 T图像(M = 3.4, SD = 0.1)评分高于0.15 T图像(M = 2.4, SD = 0.2) (p <0.01)。所有可比较序列(T1、T2、T2 FLAIR和SSFP)在0.064 T上的评分均显著高于0.15 T,评分比0.15 T高1.2分(SD = 0.3),其中T2流体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)序列在0.064 T上的评分增幅最大,平均评分差为1.5分(SD = 0.2)。0.064 T系统的扫描时间比0.15 T系统获得的图像更快,涵盖的视场更大。结论一种新型的便携式0.064 T自屏蔽磁共振成像系统在理想条件下提供的图像质量与现有的0.15 T iMR系统相当或更好、更快的采集时间。这些结果表明,0.064 T MRI有可能适用于颅内神经外科术中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Novel Portable, Mobile MRI: Comparison with an Established Low-Field Intraoperative MRI System
Abstract Background MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) using low-magnet field strength has unique advantages for intraoperative use. We compared a novel, compact, portable MR imaging system to an established intraoperative 0.15 T system to assess potential utility in intracranial neurosurgery. Methods Brain images were acquired with a 0.15 T intraoperative MRI (iMRI) system and a 0.064 T portable MR system. Five healthy volunteers were scanned. Individual sequences were rated on a 5-point (1 to 5) scale for six categories: contrast, resolution, coverage, noise, artifacts, and geometry. Results Overall, the 0.064 T images (M = 3.4, SD = 0.1) had statistically higher ratings than the 0.15 T images (M = 2.4, SD = 0.2) (p < 0.01). All comparable sequences (T1, T2, T2 FLAIR and SSFP) were rated significantly higher on the 0.064 T and were rated 1.2 points (SD = 0.3) higher than 0.15 T scanner, with the T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences showing the largest increment on the 0.064 T with an average rating difference of 1.5 points (SD = 0.2). Scanning time for the 0.064 T system obtained images more quickly and encompassed a larger field of view than the 0.15 T system. Conclusions A novel, portable 0.064 T self-shielding MRI system under ideal conditions provided images of comparable quality or better and faster acquisition times than those provided by the already well-established 0.15 T iMR system. These results suggest that the 0.064 T MRI has the potential to be adapted for intraoperative use for intracranial neurosurgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vein of Galen Malformation with Pial Arteriovenous Fistula in a 12-month-old Child. Impaired Pituitary Axis Following Traumatic Skull Base Fracture and Associated Brain Injury. The Impact of Foramen Magnum Decompression With versus Without Duraplasty on Symptom Improvement and Syrinx Reduction in Chiari 1 Malformation Patients. Utility of Artificial Intelligence in Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review. Virtual Reality in Neurosurgery: Advancing Training, Education, and Surgical Planning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1