写作课中批判性思维的提升:大学生的写作认知与批判性思维表现

Yemeserach Bayou Kebede, Tamene Kitila
{"title":"写作课中批判性思维的提升:大学生的写作认知与批判性思维表现","authors":"Yemeserach Bayou Kebede, Tamene Kitila","doi":"10.30870/jels.v8i2.19677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Promoting students’ critical thinking (CT) in writing classes gained attention in the education system following the requirement of students' CT ability in academic writing, particularly in higher education. The study sought to uncover how instructors promote students’ CT in writing classes as perceived by university students and students’ CT performance in writing. The participants were 330 first-year university students selected from Wolkite University using a stratified sampling technique. A questionnaire of Students’ Perceptions of the Promotion of CT in Writing (SPPCTW) and essay writing were used to generate data. The data analysis included descriptive statistics, spearman rho correlation, and multiple regression. The findings revealed that instructors utilized some particular CT stimulating strategies. These included allowing students to work collaboratively, make arguments, and examine the role of different expressions, words, and ideas before writing. They allowed students to perform argumentative and expository writing activities through the process approach. Contrarily, the students reported limited chances to challenge instructors' perspectives, generate ideas from different sources, and do self-reflection. The result further indicated a positive and statistically significant relationship between the students' perceptions of instructors' promotion of CT in writing classes and students' CT performance in writing. Besides, the three factors (CI, IM, and NWA) had a statistically significant and positive impact on students' CT performance in writing. Yet, the impact of SFP was negative and not statistically significant. These findings could provide insights to different concerned bodies in the English language teaching field.","PeriodicalId":44950,"journal":{"name":"3L-Language Linguistics Literature-The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Promotion of Critical Thinking in Writing Classes: University Students’ Perceptions and Critical Thinking Performance in Writing\",\"authors\":\"Yemeserach Bayou Kebede, Tamene Kitila\",\"doi\":\"10.30870/jels.v8i2.19677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Promoting students’ critical thinking (CT) in writing classes gained attention in the education system following the requirement of students' CT ability in academic writing, particularly in higher education. The study sought to uncover how instructors promote students’ CT in writing classes as perceived by university students and students’ CT performance in writing. The participants were 330 first-year university students selected from Wolkite University using a stratified sampling technique. A questionnaire of Students’ Perceptions of the Promotion of CT in Writing (SPPCTW) and essay writing were used to generate data. The data analysis included descriptive statistics, spearman rho correlation, and multiple regression. The findings revealed that instructors utilized some particular CT stimulating strategies. These included allowing students to work collaboratively, make arguments, and examine the role of different expressions, words, and ideas before writing. They allowed students to perform argumentative and expository writing activities through the process approach. Contrarily, the students reported limited chances to challenge instructors' perspectives, generate ideas from different sources, and do self-reflection. The result further indicated a positive and statistically significant relationship between the students' perceptions of instructors' promotion of CT in writing classes and students' CT performance in writing. Besides, the three factors (CI, IM, and NWA) had a statistically significant and positive impact on students' CT performance in writing. Yet, the impact of SFP was negative and not statistically significant. These findings could provide insights to different concerned bodies in the English language teaching field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"3L-Language Linguistics Literature-The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"3L-Language Linguistics Literature-The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30870/jels.v8i2.19677\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3L-Language Linguistics Literature-The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30870/jels.v8i2.19677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着学术写作对学生批判性思维能力的要求,尤其是高等教育对学生批判性思维能力的要求,在写作课堂中培养学生的批判性思维能力受到了教育系统的关注。本研究旨在揭示教师如何促进大学生在写作课上的CT认知以及学生在写作中的CT表现。参与者是采用分层抽样技术从沃尔夫凯特大学选出的330名一年级大学生。问卷调查的学生的看法,促进CT在写作(SPPCTW)和论文写作。资料分析包括描述性统计、spearman相关和多元回归。研究结果显示,教师使用了一些特殊的CT刺激策略。其中包括允许学生在写作前进行协作,进行论证,并检查不同表达,单词和想法的作用。他们允许学生通过过程方法进行议论文和说明文写作活动。相反,学生们报告说,他们很少有机会挑战老师的观点,从不同的来源产生想法,以及进行自我反思。结果进一步表明,学生对教师在写作课上推广CT的认知与学生在写作中的CT表现之间存在显著的正相关关系。此外,CI、IM和NWA三个因素对学生写作的CT成绩有统计学显著的正向影响。然而,SFP的影响是负的,没有统计学意义。这些发现可以为英语教学领域的相关机构提供一些启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Promotion of Critical Thinking in Writing Classes: University Students’ Perceptions and Critical Thinking Performance in Writing
Promoting students’ critical thinking (CT) in writing classes gained attention in the education system following the requirement of students' CT ability in academic writing, particularly in higher education. The study sought to uncover how instructors promote students’ CT in writing classes as perceived by university students and students’ CT performance in writing. The participants were 330 first-year university students selected from Wolkite University using a stratified sampling technique. A questionnaire of Students’ Perceptions of the Promotion of CT in Writing (SPPCTW) and essay writing were used to generate data. The data analysis included descriptive statistics, spearman rho correlation, and multiple regression. The findings revealed that instructors utilized some particular CT stimulating strategies. These included allowing students to work collaboratively, make arguments, and examine the role of different expressions, words, and ideas before writing. They allowed students to perform argumentative and expository writing activities through the process approach. Contrarily, the students reported limited chances to challenge instructors' perspectives, generate ideas from different sources, and do self-reflection. The result further indicated a positive and statistically significant relationship between the students' perceptions of instructors' promotion of CT in writing classes and students' CT performance in writing. Besides, the three factors (CI, IM, and NWA) had a statistically significant and positive impact on students' CT performance in writing. Yet, the impact of SFP was negative and not statistically significant. These findings could provide insights to different concerned bodies in the English language teaching field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
52
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: The editorial board welcomes submissions that provide insights into key issues dealing with the English Language in a region that hosts multicultural/lingual communities and contexts. Our policy is to enable the advancement of knowledge dealing with English Language studies in these communities and contexts by providing a publication avenue for new and insightful multidisciplinary work in the region. The ultimate objective of the journal is to create critical awareness of Southeast Asian concerns with all areas of English language Studies. Submissions that draw parallels between regional and global concerns of English Language Studies are also welome. 3L publishes issues in March, June, September and December. Please visit the website to have a better idea of the kinds of articles published and the submission guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Ecological Crises of the Capitalocene: A Study on Colleen Murphy’s The Breathing Hole Retranslation in the Malaysian Context: The Case of Two Malay Translations of Almayer’s Folly A Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination-Related News Discourse in the Malaysian Mainstream Media Spaces for Literary Production in New Order Indonesia and Beyond Rerouting The Worlding of Inter-Ethnic Estrangement Through Critical Solace: Shivani Sivagurunathan’s Yalpanam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1