“把你的剑放回鞘里”:非暴力抵抗的约翰式方法

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Review & Expositor Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1177/00346373231201522
Andrew J. Byers
{"title":"“把你的剑放回鞘里”:非暴力抵抗的约翰式方法","authors":"Andrew J. Byers","doi":"10.1177/00346373231201522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Gospel of John challenges the use of violence in both the exercise of power and in resistance to power. This article identifies how power is used in John, discusses who uses it, and examines how power is complicated or inhibited within the narrative. God and the Logos are introduced in the Prologue as the Gospel’s most powerful figures, yet their power is resisted. The Jewish leaders (often co-identified with “the Jews”) hold sociocultural power, though it is limited by Rome. The Empire looms in the background until the passion narrative, in which Roman power is relativized to the power of the empire of God. Cosmic evil co-opts Rome and the Jewish leaders and serves as the most dominant force arrayed against Jesus in the Fourth Gospel, even if constrained. Jesus’s power is superior, yet he exercises self-restraint. The article then explores the resistance practices to dominant power by the Jewish leadership, Peter, then Jesus, focusing on the arrest and (quasi-)trial in John 18. While “the Jews” resort to violence by colluding with Rome, Peter assaults with a sword then denies Jesus. Although greater in power than the arresting party and judicial authorities, Jesus responds to threats with nonviolence, undermining an imperial imagination sustained by ideologies of violence and death.","PeriodicalId":21049,"journal":{"name":"Review & Expositor","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Put your sword back into its sheath”: A Johannine approach to nonviolent resistance\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J. Byers\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00346373231201522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Gospel of John challenges the use of violence in both the exercise of power and in resistance to power. This article identifies how power is used in John, discusses who uses it, and examines how power is complicated or inhibited within the narrative. God and the Logos are introduced in the Prologue as the Gospel’s most powerful figures, yet their power is resisted. The Jewish leaders (often co-identified with “the Jews”) hold sociocultural power, though it is limited by Rome. The Empire looms in the background until the passion narrative, in which Roman power is relativized to the power of the empire of God. Cosmic evil co-opts Rome and the Jewish leaders and serves as the most dominant force arrayed against Jesus in the Fourth Gospel, even if constrained. Jesus’s power is superior, yet he exercises self-restraint. The article then explores the resistance practices to dominant power by the Jewish leadership, Peter, then Jesus, focusing on the arrest and (quasi-)trial in John 18. While “the Jews” resort to violence by colluding with Rome, Peter assaults with a sword then denies Jesus. Although greater in power than the arresting party and judicial authorities, Jesus responds to threats with nonviolence, undermining an imperial imagination sustained by ideologies of violence and death.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review & Expositor\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review & Expositor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00346373231201522\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review & Expositor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00346373231201522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

约翰福音对暴力的使用提出了挑战,无论是在行使权力还是抵抗权力的时候。本文确定了约翰是如何使用权力的,讨论了谁使用权力,并研究了权力在叙述中是如何复杂或被抑制的。上帝和逻各斯在序言中被介绍为福音中最强大的人物,然而他们的力量受到了抵制。犹太领袖(通常被认为是“犹太人”)拥有社会文化权力,尽管它受到罗马的限制。帝国一直隐现在背景中,直到激情叙事,在激情叙事中,罗马的权力相对于上帝帝国的权力。宇宙邪恶拉拢了罗马和犹太领袖,成为第四福音中反对耶稣的最主要力量,即使受到限制。耶稣的能力是超然的,但他是自我克制的。然后,文章探讨了犹太人领袖彼得和耶稣对统治权力的抵抗实践,重点关注约翰福音18章中的逮捕和(准)审判。当“犹太人”与罗马勾结,诉诸暴力时,彼得用剑攻击,然后否认耶稣。虽然比逮捕的政党和司法当局更有权力,耶稣以非暴力回应威胁,破坏了由暴力和死亡意识形态支撑的帝国想象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Put your sword back into its sheath”: A Johannine approach to nonviolent resistance
The Gospel of John challenges the use of violence in both the exercise of power and in resistance to power. This article identifies how power is used in John, discusses who uses it, and examines how power is complicated or inhibited within the narrative. God and the Logos are introduced in the Prologue as the Gospel’s most powerful figures, yet their power is resisted. The Jewish leaders (often co-identified with “the Jews”) hold sociocultural power, though it is limited by Rome. The Empire looms in the background until the passion narrative, in which Roman power is relativized to the power of the empire of God. Cosmic evil co-opts Rome and the Jewish leaders and serves as the most dominant force arrayed against Jesus in the Fourth Gospel, even if constrained. Jesus’s power is superior, yet he exercises self-restraint. The article then explores the resistance practices to dominant power by the Jewish leadership, Peter, then Jesus, focusing on the arrest and (quasi-)trial in John 18. While “the Jews” resort to violence by colluding with Rome, Peter assaults with a sword then denies Jesus. Although greater in power than the arresting party and judicial authorities, Jesus responds to threats with nonviolence, undermining an imperial imagination sustained by ideologies of violence and death.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Review & Expositor
Review & Expositor RELIGION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can Lateral Thoracic Artery Preservation Improve Results in Large PMMC Flaps? - Our Experience of 61 Cases from Northern India. “Put your sword back into its sheath”: A Johannine approach to nonviolent resistance A word about . . . violence in a pluralistic age: Constraints and opportunities for Christians Jesus and violence during Tabernacles: Wit, mercy, and accountability in John 7–8 The significance of the wounds of Jesus in the Fourth Gospel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1