中国在非洲、环境治理与公民社会:以布基纳法索的夸森林为例

Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1080/00083968.2023.2245929
Asma Amina Belem
{"title":"中国在非洲、环境治理与公民社会:以布基纳法索的夸森林为例","authors":"Asma Amina Belem","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2023.2245929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTAlong with China's rapidly expanding economic links with Africa, Chinese projects on the continent are increasingly the subject of environmental controversies. The decision by Burkinabé authorities to declassify a portion of the Kua forest – a state forest – to house a new Chinese-sponsored hospital engendered an environmental polemic. Civil society actors’ persistent opposition to the project compelled the government to adopt a more participatory approach, conduct an environmental impact assessment and, finally, find a different location for the hospital. This article examines the contribution of the domestic political context to the rise of the movement and its successes. It shows that, in environmental conflicts surrounding Chinese projects in Africa, the domestic political context within which civil society contestation takes place explains the outcome of their mobilisation, hence the nature of environmental governance in these projects. The paper also reflects on China’s lack of engagement with African civil society.RÉSUMÉParallèlement à l’expansion rapide des liens économiques de la Chine avec l’Afrique, les projets chinois sur le continent font de plus en plus l’objet de controverses environnementales. La décision des autorités du Burkina Faso de déclasser une partie de la forêt de Kua – une forêt classée – pour y installer un nouvel hôpital financé par la Chine a suscité une polémique environnementale. L’opposition persistante des acteurs de la société civile au projet a contraint le gouvernement à adopter une approche plus participative, conduire une étude d’impact environnemental et, enfin, trouver un autre emplacement pour l’hôpital. Cet article examine la contribution du contexte politique national à l'émergence du mouvement et à ses succès. Il montre que, dans les conflits environnementaux entourant les projets chinois en Afrique, le contexte politique national dans lequel se déroule la contestation de la société civile explique le résultat de la mobilisation de cette dernière, et par conséquent la nature de la gouvernance environnementale dans ces projets. L’article analyse également le manque d’engagement de la Chine avec la société civile africaine.KEYWORDS: China in Africaenvironmental protectioncivil societyactivismBurkina FasoMOTS-CLÉS: Chine en Afriqueprotection environnementalesociété civileactivismeBurkina Faso AcknowledgementsI am grateful to the three anonymous reviewers, the editor and Joagni Paré for their helpful comments on the early versions of the paper. I also thank Professor Philip Hsiaopong Liu, for continuously encouraging me to put my ideas into writing.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 This terminology is used in order to avoid giving the impression that the entire civil society of Burkina Faso participated in the movement or was unanimous on the matter. Although the movement actors comprised predominantly civil society organisations, a small number of opposition political parties also took part. The role played by the latter is discussed throughout the paper.2 See Coenen et al. (Citation2021) and Liu (Citation2021) for an exhaustive list of these guidelines.3 The Taoudeni Basin is very large. It extends across Mali, Mauritania, Guinea Bissau, Guinea Conakry, Burkina Faso, Sénégal and Sierra Leone, and slightly into Algeria. The southeastern border of this basin constitutes the sedimentary unit of the Western part of Burkina Faso (Dakoure Citation2003).4 Eaux et Forêts agents are a paramilitary body in charge of the protection of forest resources. Their department is under the charge of the Ministry of Environment.5 Note that the CNAF is an advisory committee and its decision is not binding.Additional informationNotes on contributorsAsma Amina BelemAsma Amina Belem is a PhD candidate at the Graduate Institute of Development Studies, National Cheng-Chi University. She specialises in the field of economic and social development. Her current research focuses on the political economy of Chinese aid and investments in Africa, particularly on environmental governance, medical assistance and infrastructure cooperation.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"China in Africa, environmental governance and civil society: the case of the Kua Forest in Burkina Faso\",\"authors\":\"Asma Amina Belem\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00083968.2023.2245929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTAlong with China's rapidly expanding economic links with Africa, Chinese projects on the continent are increasingly the subject of environmental controversies. The decision by Burkinabé authorities to declassify a portion of the Kua forest – a state forest – to house a new Chinese-sponsored hospital engendered an environmental polemic. Civil society actors’ persistent opposition to the project compelled the government to adopt a more participatory approach, conduct an environmental impact assessment and, finally, find a different location for the hospital. This article examines the contribution of the domestic political context to the rise of the movement and its successes. It shows that, in environmental conflicts surrounding Chinese projects in Africa, the domestic political context within which civil society contestation takes place explains the outcome of their mobilisation, hence the nature of environmental governance in these projects. The paper also reflects on China’s lack of engagement with African civil society.RÉSUMÉParallèlement à l’expansion rapide des liens économiques de la Chine avec l’Afrique, les projets chinois sur le continent font de plus en plus l’objet de controverses environnementales. La décision des autorités du Burkina Faso de déclasser une partie de la forêt de Kua – une forêt classée – pour y installer un nouvel hôpital financé par la Chine a suscité une polémique environnementale. L’opposition persistante des acteurs de la société civile au projet a contraint le gouvernement à adopter une approche plus participative, conduire une étude d’impact environnemental et, enfin, trouver un autre emplacement pour l’hôpital. Cet article examine la contribution du contexte politique national à l'émergence du mouvement et à ses succès. Il montre que, dans les conflits environnementaux entourant les projets chinois en Afrique, le contexte politique national dans lequel se déroule la contestation de la société civile explique le résultat de la mobilisation de cette dernière, et par conséquent la nature de la gouvernance environnementale dans ces projets. L’article analyse également le manque d’engagement de la Chine avec la société civile africaine.KEYWORDS: China in Africaenvironmental protectioncivil societyactivismBurkina FasoMOTS-CLÉS: Chine en Afriqueprotection environnementalesociété civileactivismeBurkina Faso AcknowledgementsI am grateful to the three anonymous reviewers, the editor and Joagni Paré for their helpful comments on the early versions of the paper. I also thank Professor Philip Hsiaopong Liu, for continuously encouraging me to put my ideas into writing.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 This terminology is used in order to avoid giving the impression that the entire civil society of Burkina Faso participated in the movement or was unanimous on the matter. Although the movement actors comprised predominantly civil society organisations, a small number of opposition political parties also took part. The role played by the latter is discussed throughout the paper.2 See Coenen et al. (Citation2021) and Liu (Citation2021) for an exhaustive list of these guidelines.3 The Taoudeni Basin is very large. It extends across Mali, Mauritania, Guinea Bissau, Guinea Conakry, Burkina Faso, Sénégal and Sierra Leone, and slightly into Algeria. The southeastern border of this basin constitutes the sedimentary unit of the Western part of Burkina Faso (Dakoure Citation2003).4 Eaux et Forêts agents are a paramilitary body in charge of the protection of forest resources. Their department is under the charge of the Ministry of Environment.5 Note that the CNAF is an advisory committee and its decision is not binding.Additional informationNotes on contributorsAsma Amina BelemAsma Amina Belem is a PhD candidate at the Graduate Institute of Development Studies, National Cheng-Chi University. She specialises in the field of economic and social development. Her current research focuses on the political economy of Chinese aid and investments in Africa, particularly on environmental governance, medical assistance and infrastructure cooperation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00083968.2023.2245929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00083968.2023.2245929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着中国与非洲经济联系的迅速扩大,中国在非洲大陆的项目越来越多地成为环境争议的主题。布基纳法索当局决定解密夸森林(Kua forest)的一部分——这是一处国有森林——以容纳一家中国资助的新医院,这一决定引发了一场环境争议。民间社会行为者对该项目的持续反对迫使政府采取更具参与性的做法,进行环境影响评估,并最终为医院找到一个不同的地点。本文考察了国内政治环境对运动兴起及其成功的贡献。这表明,在围绕中国在非洲项目的环境冲突中,民间社会争论发生的国内政治背景解释了他们动员的结果,从而解释了这些项目中环境治理的性质。该报告还反映了中国缺乏与非洲公民社会的接触。RESUMEParallelement一l 'expansion主des留置权资本再生产de la中国用l中部,莱斯项目厨房用漏勺关于大陆字体de + en + l 'objet de controverses组织。关于布基纳法索政府的 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -“反对社会行为者持续反对社会行为者、公民和其他项目,限制政府采取一种办法加上参与性、指导性的一种方式,以影响环境、最终、最终的安置方式'hôpital”。这篇文章考察了政治背景对国家经济转型运动和经济成功的贡献。我的意思是,我的问题是冲突问题,我的环境问题,我的项目,我的项目,我的项目,我的项目,我的项目,我的项目,我的项目,我的项目,我的项目,我的项目,我的项目,我的项目,我的项目本文分析了中国社会与非洲公民之间的交往与交换。关键词:中国在非洲环境保护民间社会活动布基纳法索FasoMOTS-CLÉS感谢三位匿名审稿人、编辑和Joagni par对本文早期版本的有益意见。我还要感谢Philip Hsiaopong Liu教授,他一直鼓励我把自己的想法写下来。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1使用这一术语是为了避免给人一种印象,即布基纳法索的整个民间社会都参加了这一运动或在这个问题上意见一致。虽然运动参与者主要由民间社会组织组成,但也有少数反对派政党参加。本文讨论了后者所起的作用参见Coenen et al. (Citation2021)和Liu (Citation2021)获取这些指南的详尽列表陶德尼盆地非常大。它横跨马里、毛里塔尼亚、几内亚比绍、几内亚科纳克里、布基纳法索、ssamnassal和塞拉利昂,并略微进入阿尔及利亚。3 .该盆地的东南边界构成了布基纳法索西部的沉积单元(Dakoure Citation2003)Eaux et Forêts代理人是一个负责保护森林资源的准军事机构。5请注意,中国环保部是一个咨询委员会,其决定不具有约束力。作者简介:本文作者是国立政治大学发展研究所的博士研究生。她专门研究经济和社会发展领域。她目前的研究重点是中国对非洲援助和投资的政治经济学,特别是在环境治理、医疗援助和基础设施合作方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
China in Africa, environmental governance and civil society: the case of the Kua Forest in Burkina Faso
ABSTRACTAlong with China's rapidly expanding economic links with Africa, Chinese projects on the continent are increasingly the subject of environmental controversies. The decision by Burkinabé authorities to declassify a portion of the Kua forest – a state forest – to house a new Chinese-sponsored hospital engendered an environmental polemic. Civil society actors’ persistent opposition to the project compelled the government to adopt a more participatory approach, conduct an environmental impact assessment and, finally, find a different location for the hospital. This article examines the contribution of the domestic political context to the rise of the movement and its successes. It shows that, in environmental conflicts surrounding Chinese projects in Africa, the domestic political context within which civil society contestation takes place explains the outcome of their mobilisation, hence the nature of environmental governance in these projects. The paper also reflects on China’s lack of engagement with African civil society.RÉSUMÉParallèlement à l’expansion rapide des liens économiques de la Chine avec l’Afrique, les projets chinois sur le continent font de plus en plus l’objet de controverses environnementales. La décision des autorités du Burkina Faso de déclasser une partie de la forêt de Kua – une forêt classée – pour y installer un nouvel hôpital financé par la Chine a suscité une polémique environnementale. L’opposition persistante des acteurs de la société civile au projet a contraint le gouvernement à adopter une approche plus participative, conduire une étude d’impact environnemental et, enfin, trouver un autre emplacement pour l’hôpital. Cet article examine la contribution du contexte politique national à l'émergence du mouvement et à ses succès. Il montre que, dans les conflits environnementaux entourant les projets chinois en Afrique, le contexte politique national dans lequel se déroule la contestation de la société civile explique le résultat de la mobilisation de cette dernière, et par conséquent la nature de la gouvernance environnementale dans ces projets. L’article analyse également le manque d’engagement de la Chine avec la société civile africaine.KEYWORDS: China in Africaenvironmental protectioncivil societyactivismBurkina FasoMOTS-CLÉS: Chine en Afriqueprotection environnementalesociété civileactivismeBurkina Faso AcknowledgementsI am grateful to the three anonymous reviewers, the editor and Joagni Paré for their helpful comments on the early versions of the paper. I also thank Professor Philip Hsiaopong Liu, for continuously encouraging me to put my ideas into writing.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 This terminology is used in order to avoid giving the impression that the entire civil society of Burkina Faso participated in the movement or was unanimous on the matter. Although the movement actors comprised predominantly civil society organisations, a small number of opposition political parties also took part. The role played by the latter is discussed throughout the paper.2 See Coenen et al. (Citation2021) and Liu (Citation2021) for an exhaustive list of these guidelines.3 The Taoudeni Basin is very large. It extends across Mali, Mauritania, Guinea Bissau, Guinea Conakry, Burkina Faso, Sénégal and Sierra Leone, and slightly into Algeria. The southeastern border of this basin constitutes the sedimentary unit of the Western part of Burkina Faso (Dakoure Citation2003).4 Eaux et Forêts agents are a paramilitary body in charge of the protection of forest resources. Their department is under the charge of the Ministry of Environment.5 Note that the CNAF is an advisory committee and its decision is not binding.Additional informationNotes on contributorsAsma Amina BelemAsma Amina Belem is a PhD candidate at the Graduate Institute of Development Studies, National Cheng-Chi University. She specialises in the field of economic and social development. Her current research focuses on the political economy of Chinese aid and investments in Africa, particularly on environmental governance, medical assistance and infrastructure cooperation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1