利多卡因40 mg与芬太尼100 ug预处理预防异丙酚静脉注射相关疼痛的比较

Syed Adnan Alam, Rashid Ullah Khan, Muhammad Bilal, Khurram Liaqat, Afia Rahna, Javed Iqbal
{"title":"利多卡因40 mg与芬太尼100 ug预处理预防异丙酚静脉注射相关疼痛的比较","authors":"Syed Adnan Alam, Rashid Ullah Khan, Muhammad Bilal, Khurram Liaqat, Afia Rahna, Javed Iqbal","doi":"10.35787/jimdc.v12i3.1048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract&#x0D; Background: Propofol (2,6-di-isopropylphenol) is one of the most favored drugs used for induction of anesthesia. Pain on injection is a common problem. Various methods have been tried to alleviate this pain but with conflicting results.&#x0D; Objective: To compare effectiveness of lignocaine versus fentanyl in patients receiving propofol for general anesthesia in population of Pakistan who come to PIMS hospital in Islamabad.&#x0D; Materials and Methods: 120 participants of either sex, between 18 and 40 years of age, belonging to ASA physical status I and II, undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, were randomized into two equal groups of 60 participants. They received, intravenously, either lignocaine 2 ml (20 mg/ml )or fentanyl 2 ml (50 mcg/mL) as a pretreatment before propofol injection.&#x0D; Results: The efficacy of lignocaine as a pretreatment drug injection was higher (96.7%) compared to fentanyl (85.0%). In the lignocaine group, 2.3% of the participants experienced pain as compared with 15% in the fentanyl group (P<0.05).&#x0D; Conclusion: Compared with fentanyl, lignocaine pretreatment was more effective in preventing pain on propofol injection.&#x0D; KEY WORDS: Comparison, Fentanyl, LIgnocaine, Propofol, Pain.","PeriodicalId":33701,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamabad Medical and Dental College","volume":"224 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Pretreatment with Lignocaine 40 mg and Fentanyl 100 ug as an Adjuvant for Preclusion of Pain Associated with Intravenous Propofol Injection\",\"authors\":\"Syed Adnan Alam, Rashid Ullah Khan, Muhammad Bilal, Khurram Liaqat, Afia Rahna, Javed Iqbal\",\"doi\":\"10.35787/jimdc.v12i3.1048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract&#x0D; Background: Propofol (2,6-di-isopropylphenol) is one of the most favored drugs used for induction of anesthesia. Pain on injection is a common problem. Various methods have been tried to alleviate this pain but with conflicting results.&#x0D; Objective: To compare effectiveness of lignocaine versus fentanyl in patients receiving propofol for general anesthesia in population of Pakistan who come to PIMS hospital in Islamabad.&#x0D; Materials and Methods: 120 participants of either sex, between 18 and 40 years of age, belonging to ASA physical status I and II, undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, were randomized into two equal groups of 60 participants. They received, intravenously, either lignocaine 2 ml (20 mg/ml )or fentanyl 2 ml (50 mcg/mL) as a pretreatment before propofol injection.&#x0D; Results: The efficacy of lignocaine as a pretreatment drug injection was higher (96.7%) compared to fentanyl (85.0%). In the lignocaine group, 2.3% of the participants experienced pain as compared with 15% in the fentanyl group (P<0.05).&#x0D; Conclusion: Compared with fentanyl, lignocaine pretreatment was more effective in preventing pain on propofol injection.&#x0D; KEY WORDS: Comparison, Fentanyl, LIgnocaine, Propofol, Pain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Islamabad Medical and Dental College\",\"volume\":\"224 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Islamabad Medical and Dental College\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35787/jimdc.v12i3.1048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamabad Medical and Dental College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35787/jimdc.v12i3.1048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要# x0D;背景:异丙酚(2,6-二异丙酚)是最常用的麻醉诱导药物之一。注射时疼痛是一个常见的问题。人们尝试了各种方法来减轻这种痛苦,但结果却相互矛盾。 目的:比较利多卡因与芬太尼在巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡PIMS医院接受异丙酚全身麻醉患者中的疗效。材料与方法:在全麻下行择期手术,年龄在18 ~ 40岁,ASA身体状态为I和II的患者120例,男女不限,随机分为两组,每组60例。他们在注射异丙酚前静脉注射利多卡因2ml (20mg /ml)或芬太尼2ml (50mcg /ml)作为预处理。结果:利多卡因作为注射前用药的疗效(96.7%)高于芬太尼(85.0%)。在利多卡因组中,2.3%的参与者经历了疼痛,而芬太尼组为15% (P<0.05)。结论:与芬太尼相比,利多卡因预处理对异丙酚注射疼痛的预防效果更好。关键词:比较,芬太尼,利ignocaine,异丙酚,疼痛
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing the Pretreatment with Lignocaine 40 mg and Fentanyl 100 ug as an Adjuvant for Preclusion of Pain Associated with Intravenous Propofol Injection
Abstract Background: Propofol (2,6-di-isopropylphenol) is one of the most favored drugs used for induction of anesthesia. Pain on injection is a common problem. Various methods have been tried to alleviate this pain but with conflicting results. Objective: To compare effectiveness of lignocaine versus fentanyl in patients receiving propofol for general anesthesia in population of Pakistan who come to PIMS hospital in Islamabad. Materials and Methods: 120 participants of either sex, between 18 and 40 years of age, belonging to ASA physical status I and II, undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, were randomized into two equal groups of 60 participants. They received, intravenously, either lignocaine 2 ml (20 mg/ml )or fentanyl 2 ml (50 mcg/mL) as a pretreatment before propofol injection. Results: The efficacy of lignocaine as a pretreatment drug injection was higher (96.7%) compared to fentanyl (85.0%). In the lignocaine group, 2.3% of the participants experienced pain as compared with 15% in the fentanyl group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with fentanyl, lignocaine pretreatment was more effective in preventing pain on propofol injection. KEY WORDS: Comparison, Fentanyl, LIgnocaine, Propofol, Pain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Does Laparoscopic Lens Contamination Effect Operative Time? A study on the Frequency and Duration of Lens Contamination and Commonly Used Measures to Maintain Clear Vision Analysis of Therapeutic Phlebotomy in Patients of Polycythemia: A Single Center Study Potential of Gut Microbiome in mosquitoes for Dengue Vector Control Prolapsed Fibroid in Pregnancy Leiomyoma of the Trachea: A Rare Tracheal Tumor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1