赢得选举的机会对社交媒体策略的影响

Taichi Murayama, Akira Matsui, Kunihiro Miyazaki, Yasuko Matsubara, Yasushi Sakurai
{"title":"赢得选举的机会对社交媒体策略的影响","authors":"Taichi Murayama, Akira Matsui, Kunihiro Miyazaki, Yasuko Matsubara, Yasushi Sakurai","doi":"10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media has been a paramount arena for election campaigns for political actors. While many studies have been paying attention to the political campaigns related to partisanship, politicians also can conduct different campaigns according to their chances of winning. Leading candidates, for example, do not behave the same as fringe candidates in their elections, and vice versa. We, however, know little about this difference in social media political campaign strategies according to their odds in elections. We tackle this problem by analyzing candidates' tweets in terms of users, topics, and sentiment of replies. Our study finds that, as their chances of winning increase, candidates narrow the targets they communicate with, from people in general to the electrical districts and specific persons (verified accounts or accounts with many followers). Our study brings new insights into the candidates' campaign strategies through the analysis based on the novel perspective of the candidate's electoral situation.","PeriodicalId":338112,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Chance of Winning Election Impacts on Social Media Strategy\",\"authors\":\"Taichi Murayama, Akira Matsui, Kunihiro Miyazaki, Yasuko Matsubara, Yasushi Sakurai\",\"doi\":\"10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social media has been a paramount arena for election campaigns for political actors. While many studies have been paying attention to the political campaigns related to partisanship, politicians also can conduct different campaigns according to their chances of winning. Leading candidates, for example, do not behave the same as fringe candidates in their elections, and vice versa. We, however, know little about this difference in social media political campaign strategies according to their odds in elections. We tackle this problem by analyzing candidates' tweets in terms of users, topics, and sentiment of replies. Our study finds that, as their chances of winning increase, candidates narrow the targets they communicate with, from people in general to the electrical districts and specific persons (verified accounts or accounts with many followers). Our study brings new insights into the candidates' campaign strategies through the analysis based on the novel perspective of the candidate's electoral situation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社交媒体一直是政治人物竞选活动的重要舞台。虽然许多研究一直关注与党派关系相关的政治竞选,但政治家也可以根据他们获胜的机会进行不同的竞选。例如,领先的候选人在选举中表现得与边缘候选人不同,反之亦然。然而,我们对社交媒体政治竞选策略的这种差异知之甚少,因为它们在选举中的胜算很大。我们通过分析候选人的推文的用户、主题和回复情绪来解决这个问题。我们的研究发现,随着获胜机会的增加,候选人缩小了他们沟通的目标,从一般人到电气区域和特定的人(验证帐户或拥有许多粉丝的帐户)。本研究通过对候选人选举形势的新视角分析,对候选人的竞选策略有了新的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Chance of Winning Election Impacts on Social Media Strategy
Social media has been a paramount arena for election campaigns for political actors. While many studies have been paying attention to the political campaigns related to partisanship, politicians also can conduct different campaigns according to their chances of winning. Leading candidates, for example, do not behave the same as fringe candidates in their elections, and vice versa. We, however, know little about this difference in social media political campaign strategies according to their odds in elections. We tackle this problem by analyzing candidates' tweets in terms of users, topics, and sentiment of replies. Our study finds that, as their chances of winning increase, candidates narrow the targets they communicate with, from people in general to the electrical districts and specific persons (verified accounts or accounts with many followers). Our study brings new insights into the candidates' campaign strategies through the analysis based on the novel perspective of the candidate's electoral situation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statement of Removal AnnoBERT: Effectively Representing Multiple Annotators’ Label Choices to Improve Hate Speech Detection Just Another Day on Twitter: A Complete 24 Hours of Twitter Data #RoeOverturned: Twitter Dataset on the Abortion Rights Controversy SexWEs: Domain-Aware Word Embeddings via Cross-Lingual Semantic Specialisation for Chinese Sexism Detection in Social Media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1