从最优惠客户采购规则中获利:来自医疗补助的证据

IF 5.6 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS American Economic Journal-Economic Policy Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1257/pol.20200688
Josh Feng, Thomas Hwang, Luca Maini
{"title":"从最优惠客户采购规则中获利:来自医疗补助的证据","authors":"Josh Feng, Thomas Hwang, Luca Maini","doi":"10.1257/pol.20200688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using a difference-in-difference approach, we find that an increase to Medicaid’s minimum drug rebate under the Affordable Care Act in 2010 lowered non-Medicaid drug spending by 2.5 percent. A stylized bargaining model shows that this is likely driven by the interaction of this reform with Medicaid’s “most-favored customer” clause (MFCC). By examining the response of drugs that faced a change in incentives equivalent to the removal of Medicaid’s MFCC, we estimate that removing the Medicaid MFCC would have reduced overall 2010 non-Medicaid drug spending by an additional 3.5 percent, though it would have likely also increased Medicaid spending. (JEL C78, H51, I18, I38, L65)","PeriodicalId":48093,"journal":{"name":"American Economic Journal-Economic Policy","volume":"252 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profiting from Most-Favored-Customer Procurement Rules: Evidence from Medicaid\",\"authors\":\"Josh Feng, Thomas Hwang, Luca Maini\",\"doi\":\"10.1257/pol.20200688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using a difference-in-difference approach, we find that an increase to Medicaid’s minimum drug rebate under the Affordable Care Act in 2010 lowered non-Medicaid drug spending by 2.5 percent. A stylized bargaining model shows that this is likely driven by the interaction of this reform with Medicaid’s “most-favored customer” clause (MFCC). By examining the response of drugs that faced a change in incentives equivalent to the removal of Medicaid’s MFCC, we estimate that removing the Medicaid MFCC would have reduced overall 2010 non-Medicaid drug spending by an additional 3.5 percent, though it would have likely also increased Medicaid spending. (JEL C78, H51, I18, I38, L65)\",\"PeriodicalId\":48093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Economic Journal-Economic Policy\",\"volume\":\"252 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Economic Journal-Economic Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20200688\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Economic Journal-Economic Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20200688","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用差异中的差异方法,我们发现2010年《平价医疗法案》下医疗补助最低药品回扣的增加使非医疗补助药品支出降低了2.5%。一个程式化的讨价还价模型表明,这可能是由这项改革与医疗补助的“最优惠客户”条款(MFCC)的相互作用推动的。通过研究那些面临激励变化的药品的反应,相当于取消医疗补助的MFCC,我们估计,取消医疗补助的MFCC将使2010年非医疗补助药物的总体支出额外减少3.5%,尽管这可能也会增加医疗补助的支出。(jel c78, h51, i18, i38, l65)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Profiting from Most-Favored-Customer Procurement Rules: Evidence from Medicaid
Using a difference-in-difference approach, we find that an increase to Medicaid’s minimum drug rebate under the Affordable Care Act in 2010 lowered non-Medicaid drug spending by 2.5 percent. A stylized bargaining model shows that this is likely driven by the interaction of this reform with Medicaid’s “most-favored customer” clause (MFCC). By examining the response of drugs that faced a change in incentives equivalent to the removal of Medicaid’s MFCC, we estimate that removing the Medicaid MFCC would have reduced overall 2010 non-Medicaid drug spending by an additional 3.5 percent, though it would have likely also increased Medicaid spending. (JEL C78, H51, I18, I38, L65)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
1.90%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The American Economic Review (AER) is a general-interest economics journal. The journal publishes 12 issues containing articles on a broad range of topics. Established in 1911, the AER is among the nation's oldest and most respected scholarly journals in economics. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy publishes papers covering a range of topics, the common theme being the role of economic policy in economic outcomes. Subject areas include public economics; urban and regional economics; public policy aspects of health, education, welfare and political institutions; law and economics; economic regulation; and environmental and natural resource economics.
期刊最新文献
Moved to Poverty? A Legacy of the Apartheid Experiment in South Africa Public Pension Reforms and Retirement Decisions: Narrative Evidence and Aggregate Implications Digitization and the Market for Physical Works: Evidence from the Google Books Project Information and Spillovers from Targeting Policy in Peru’s Anchoveta Fishery Market Power and Price Exposure: Learning from Changes in Renewable Energy Regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1