微创手术治疗溃疡性结肠炎的综述:不止一种剥猫皮的方法

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.21037/ales-23-7
Charles Browning, Karen Zaghiyan
{"title":"微创手术治疗溃疡性结肠炎的综述:不止一种剥猫皮的方法","authors":"Charles Browning, Karen Zaghiyan","doi":"10.21037/ales-23-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in ulcerative colitis (UC) remains an important part of the surgical arsenal despite advances in biologic treatments for UC. There remains a need for operative intervention in approximately 30% of patients, even with advanced medical therapies. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the preferred surgery for UC patients with medically refractory disease, refractory bleeding, or dysplasia/cancer. As in most surgical procedures, the move toward MIS has improved overall patient outcomes and UC is no exception. Historically patients have undergone laparotomy for total abdominal colectomy (TAC) and IPAA with the frequent need for multistage surgery as well as multiquadrant abdominopelvic surgery presenting a challenge in the adoption of MIS surgery for UC. However, advances in minimally invasive techniques over the last two decades from hand-assist laparoscopy, to totally laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery, and transanal approaches have facilitated the gradual move toward MIS. With clear advantages in short-term surgical outcomes including reduced pain, shorter hospital stay, faster return of bowel function, improved cosmesis as well as some potential long-term benefits in bowel function, female fertility, and male sexual function it is clear that MIS for UC is here to stay. Even in an urgent setting with fulminant colitis, laparoscopy is safe and should be preferred over midline laparotomy except in unstable patient. Here, we will discuss the various approaches for MIS surgery in UC including potential advantages and pitfalls of each approach.","PeriodicalId":8024,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of minimally invasive surgery in ulcerative colitis: more than one way to skin a cat\",\"authors\":\"Charles Browning, Karen Zaghiyan\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/ales-23-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in ulcerative colitis (UC) remains an important part of the surgical arsenal despite advances in biologic treatments for UC. There remains a need for operative intervention in approximately 30% of patients, even with advanced medical therapies. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the preferred surgery for UC patients with medically refractory disease, refractory bleeding, or dysplasia/cancer. As in most surgical procedures, the move toward MIS has improved overall patient outcomes and UC is no exception. Historically patients have undergone laparotomy for total abdominal colectomy (TAC) and IPAA with the frequent need for multistage surgery as well as multiquadrant abdominopelvic surgery presenting a challenge in the adoption of MIS surgery for UC. However, advances in minimally invasive techniques over the last two decades from hand-assist laparoscopy, to totally laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery, and transanal approaches have facilitated the gradual move toward MIS. With clear advantages in short-term surgical outcomes including reduced pain, shorter hospital stay, faster return of bowel function, improved cosmesis as well as some potential long-term benefits in bowel function, female fertility, and male sexual function it is clear that MIS for UC is here to stay. Even in an urgent setting with fulminant colitis, laparoscopy is safe and should be preferred over midline laparotomy except in unstable patient. Here, we will discuss the various approaches for MIS surgery in UC including potential advantages and pitfalls of each approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/ales-23-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/ales-23-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的生物治疗取得了进展,但微创手术(MIS)仍然是外科治疗的重要组成部分。即使采用先进的医学疗法,仍有大约30%的患者需要手术干预。恢复性直结肠切除术与回肠袋-肛门吻合术(IPAA)是UC患者医学难治性疾病,难治性出血,或不典型增生/癌症的首选手术。在大多数外科手术中,MIS的应用改善了患者的整体预后,UC也不例外。历史上,患者接受剖腹手术进行全腹结肠切除术(TAC)和IPAA,经常需要多阶段手术和多象限腹部骨盆手术,这对UC采用MIS手术提出了挑战。然而,在过去的二十年中,微创技术的进步,从手扶腹腔镜手术到全腹腔镜手术、机器人手术和经肛门入路,促进了MIS的逐步发展。在短期手术结果方面有明显的优势,包括减轻疼痛、缩短住院时间、更快恢复肠道功能、改善美容,以及在肠道功能、女性生育能力和男性性功能方面的一些潜在长期益处,显然,UC的MIS将继续存在。即使在暴发性结肠炎的紧急情况下,腹腔镜检查也是安全的,除病情不稳定的患者外,应优先于中线剖腹手术。在这里,我们将讨论UC中MIS手术的各种方法,包括每种方法的潜在优势和缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A review of minimally invasive surgery in ulcerative colitis: more than one way to skin a cat
: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in ulcerative colitis (UC) remains an important part of the surgical arsenal despite advances in biologic treatments for UC. There remains a need for operative intervention in approximately 30% of patients, even with advanced medical therapies. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the preferred surgery for UC patients with medically refractory disease, refractory bleeding, or dysplasia/cancer. As in most surgical procedures, the move toward MIS has improved overall patient outcomes and UC is no exception. Historically patients have undergone laparotomy for total abdominal colectomy (TAC) and IPAA with the frequent need for multistage surgery as well as multiquadrant abdominopelvic surgery presenting a challenge in the adoption of MIS surgery for UC. However, advances in minimally invasive techniques over the last two decades from hand-assist laparoscopy, to totally laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery, and transanal approaches have facilitated the gradual move toward MIS. With clear advantages in short-term surgical outcomes including reduced pain, shorter hospital stay, faster return of bowel function, improved cosmesis as well as some potential long-term benefits in bowel function, female fertility, and male sexual function it is clear that MIS for UC is here to stay. Even in an urgent setting with fulminant colitis, laparoscopy is safe and should be preferred over midline laparotomy except in unstable patient. Here, we will discuss the various approaches for MIS surgery in UC including potential advantages and pitfalls of each approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery goes visual The evolution of minimally invasive inguinal hernia repairs Evaluation of Muslim women’s perspectives on natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) surgery Small bowel anastomotic volvulus at reversed loop ileostomy site: a case report Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: a literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1