内镜下结肠肿瘤性病变的粘膜下剥离:临床应用与技术

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.21037/ales-23-12
Thomas J. Wang, Hiroyuki Aihara
{"title":"内镜下结肠肿瘤性病变的粘膜下剥离:临床应用与技术","authors":"Thomas J. Wang, Hiroyuki Aihara","doi":"10.21037/ales-23-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), first developed in Japan, is increasingly performed worldwide to allow en bloc removal of large lesions from the gastrointestinal tract. Colorectal ESD results in higher en bloc and R0 resection rates than those in endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), thus reducing the risk of local recurrence and allowing accurate pathological evaluations. Compared with surgical resection, ESD is better tolerated by patients, with reduced adverse event rates, hospitalization durations, and costs. Colorectal ESD is most appropriate for lesions larger than 20 mm with a risk of submucosal invasion and that are difficult to remove en bloc or for lesions in which previous EMR had failed or was not possible. However, inferior en bloc and R0 resection rates of colorectal ESD have been reported in the US compared to those in Japan, potentially due to increased technical challenges secondary to higher prevalence of obesity and significantly greater occurrence of fibrotic lesions in the US due to previous resection attempts. Recently, colorectal ESD guidelines have been updated, and various techniques and technologies have been developed to improve colorectal ESD outcomes, reduce procedure time, and overcome technical challenges. This article will discuss updated indications, new devices, resection strategies, technique variations, and clinical outcomes of colorectal ESD with regional comparisons (i.e., North America, Europe, and Japan).","PeriodicalId":8024,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic submucosal dissection of neoplastic lesions of the colon: clinical application and techniques\",\"authors\":\"Thomas J. Wang, Hiroyuki Aihara\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/ales-23-12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), first developed in Japan, is increasingly performed worldwide to allow en bloc removal of large lesions from the gastrointestinal tract. Colorectal ESD results in higher en bloc and R0 resection rates than those in endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), thus reducing the risk of local recurrence and allowing accurate pathological evaluations. Compared with surgical resection, ESD is better tolerated by patients, with reduced adverse event rates, hospitalization durations, and costs. Colorectal ESD is most appropriate for lesions larger than 20 mm with a risk of submucosal invasion and that are difficult to remove en bloc or for lesions in which previous EMR had failed or was not possible. However, inferior en bloc and R0 resection rates of colorectal ESD have been reported in the US compared to those in Japan, potentially due to increased technical challenges secondary to higher prevalence of obesity and significantly greater occurrence of fibrotic lesions in the US due to previous resection attempts. Recently, colorectal ESD guidelines have been updated, and various techniques and technologies have been developed to improve colorectal ESD outcomes, reduce procedure time, and overcome technical challenges. This article will discuss updated indications, new devices, resection strategies, technique variations, and clinical outcomes of colorectal ESD with regional comparisons (i.e., North America, Europe, and Japan).\",\"PeriodicalId\":8024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/ales-23-12\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/ales-23-12","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内镜下粘膜剥离术(ESD)最早在日本开发,在世界范围内越来越多地应用于胃肠道大病变的整体切除。与内镜下粘膜切除术(EMR)相比,结肠直肠ESD的整体和R0切除率更高,从而降低了局部复发的风险,并可以进行准确的病理评估。与手术切除相比,患者对ESD的耐受性更好,不良事件发生率、住院时间和费用都降低了。结肠直肠ESD最适用于大于20mm且有粘膜下浸润风险且难以整体切除的病变,或既往EMR失败或无法切除的病变。然而,据报道,与日本相比,美国结肠直肠ESD的整体和R0切除率较低,这可能是由于美国肥胖患病率较高导致的技术挑战增加,以及由于先前的切除尝试导致的纤维化病变发生率显著增加。近年来,结肠直肠ESD指南不断更新,并开发了各种技术和技术来改善结肠直肠ESD的效果,缩短手术时间,并克服技术挑战。本文将讨论结肠直肠ESD的最新适应症、新设备、切除策略、技术变化和临床结果,并进行区域比较(即北美、欧洲和日本)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of neoplastic lesions of the colon: clinical application and techniques
: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), first developed in Japan, is increasingly performed worldwide to allow en bloc removal of large lesions from the gastrointestinal tract. Colorectal ESD results in higher en bloc and R0 resection rates than those in endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), thus reducing the risk of local recurrence and allowing accurate pathological evaluations. Compared with surgical resection, ESD is better tolerated by patients, with reduced adverse event rates, hospitalization durations, and costs. Colorectal ESD is most appropriate for lesions larger than 20 mm with a risk of submucosal invasion and that are difficult to remove en bloc or for lesions in which previous EMR had failed or was not possible. However, inferior en bloc and R0 resection rates of colorectal ESD have been reported in the US compared to those in Japan, potentially due to increased technical challenges secondary to higher prevalence of obesity and significantly greater occurrence of fibrotic lesions in the US due to previous resection attempts. Recently, colorectal ESD guidelines have been updated, and various techniques and technologies have been developed to improve colorectal ESD outcomes, reduce procedure time, and overcome technical challenges. This article will discuss updated indications, new devices, resection strategies, technique variations, and clinical outcomes of colorectal ESD with regional comparisons (i.e., North America, Europe, and Japan).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Minimally invasive colorectal surgery—the sky is the limit Robotic approaches for vascular and endovascular procedures: a narrative review A review of minimally invasive surgery in ulcerative colitis: more than one way to skin a cat Colon polyp characterization (morphology and mucosal patterns): clinical application and techniques Colon cancer: is the robot a better option?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1