NSM GFRP对火灾后钢筋混凝土梁的加固:实验与理论模型

IF 2.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Composites for Construction Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1061/jccof2.cceng-3933
Vu Nguyen Nguyen, Vui Van Cao
{"title":"NSM GFRP对火灾后钢筋混凝土梁的加固:实验与理论模型","authors":"Vu Nguyen Nguyen, Vui Van Cao","doi":"10.1061/jccof2.cceng-3933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effectiveness of near-surface mounted glass fiber–reinforced polymer (NSM GFRP) retrofitting of reinforced concrete (RC) beams after exposure to fire is investigated in this study both experimentally and analytically. Experiments were performed on nine RC beams: one beam was not exposed to fire (control specimen) and eight beams were divided into two groups exposed to fire for 30 and 60 min. In each group, one beam was not retrofitted, whereas the other three beams were retrofitted using NSM GFRP. After retrofitting, all beams were loaded until failure. The experimental results confirmed that the retrofitting technique effectively recovered the strengths of postfire RC beams. The failure mode of the GFRP retrofitted beams was the peeling-off of concrete cover, whereas that of the control and unretrofitted postfire beams was flexural failure via the yielding of tension steel. The NSM GFRP retrofitting fully recovered or significantly increased the yield and ultimate strengths of postfire RC beams by up to 39%. The yield deflection capacity of the NSM GFRP retrofitted postfire beams was much higher than that of the control beam; however, the ultimate deflection capacity of these beams significantly decreased. Consequently, the GFRP retrofitted postfire beams were of low ductility because of the peeling-off of the concrete cover. NSM GFRP retrofitting slightly improved but did not completely recover the yield stiffness reduced by fire, whereas it increased the plastic stiffness significantly by up to threefold. An analytical model for estimating the yield moment of postfire RC beams without/with NSM GFRP retrofitting was proposed, considering the very limited information, for example, fire duration obtained from actual fire events. The practicality and reasonable accuracy of the proposed model render it beneficial for structural engineers.","PeriodicalId":15540,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Composites for Construction","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NSM GFRP Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams after Exposure to Fire: Experiments and Theoretical Model\",\"authors\":\"Vu Nguyen Nguyen, Vui Van Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1061/jccof2.cceng-3933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The effectiveness of near-surface mounted glass fiber–reinforced polymer (NSM GFRP) retrofitting of reinforced concrete (RC) beams after exposure to fire is investigated in this study both experimentally and analytically. Experiments were performed on nine RC beams: one beam was not exposed to fire (control specimen) and eight beams were divided into two groups exposed to fire for 30 and 60 min. In each group, one beam was not retrofitted, whereas the other three beams were retrofitted using NSM GFRP. After retrofitting, all beams were loaded until failure. The experimental results confirmed that the retrofitting technique effectively recovered the strengths of postfire RC beams. The failure mode of the GFRP retrofitted beams was the peeling-off of concrete cover, whereas that of the control and unretrofitted postfire beams was flexural failure via the yielding of tension steel. The NSM GFRP retrofitting fully recovered or significantly increased the yield and ultimate strengths of postfire RC beams by up to 39%. The yield deflection capacity of the NSM GFRP retrofitted postfire beams was much higher than that of the control beam; however, the ultimate deflection capacity of these beams significantly decreased. Consequently, the GFRP retrofitted postfire beams were of low ductility because of the peeling-off of the concrete cover. NSM GFRP retrofitting slightly improved but did not completely recover the yield stiffness reduced by fire, whereas it increased the plastic stiffness significantly by up to threefold. An analytical model for estimating the yield moment of postfire RC beams without/with NSM GFRP retrofitting was proposed, considering the very limited information, for example, fire duration obtained from actual fire events. The practicality and reasonable accuracy of the proposed model render it beneficial for structural engineers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Composites for Construction\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Composites for Construction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1061/jccof2.cceng-3933\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Composites for Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/jccof2.cceng-3933","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从实验和分析两方面研究了近表面安装玻璃纤维增强聚合物(NSM GFRP)对火灾后钢筋混凝土(RC)梁的加固效果。实验在9根RC梁上进行:1根梁未暴露于火中(对照试件),8根梁分为两组,分别暴露于火中30和60分钟。每组中,1根梁未进行改造,而其他3根梁则使用NSM GFRP进行改造。改造后,所有梁都被加载,直到失效。试验结果表明,加固技术能有效地恢复火灾后RC梁的强度。GFRP加固梁的破坏模式为混凝土覆盖层的剥离,而对照和未加固的火后梁的破坏模式为受拉钢屈服的弯曲破坏。NSM GFRP加固完全恢复或显著提高了火灾后RC梁的屈服和极限强度,最高可达39%。NSM玻璃钢加固火后梁的屈服挠曲能力远高于对照梁;然而,这些梁的极限挠度能力明显降低。因此,由于混凝土覆盖层的剥离,GFRP加固的火灾后梁的延展性较低。NSM GFRP改造略有改善,但不能完全恢复火灾降低的屈服刚度,而塑性刚度则显著提高了三倍。考虑到从实际火灾事件中获得的火灾持续时间等信息非常有限,提出了不加/加NSM玻璃钢加固的RC梁火灾后屈服矩的分析模型。该模型的实用性和合理的精度对结构工程师有一定的参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NSM GFRP Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams after Exposure to Fire: Experiments and Theoretical Model
The effectiveness of near-surface mounted glass fiber–reinforced polymer (NSM GFRP) retrofitting of reinforced concrete (RC) beams after exposure to fire is investigated in this study both experimentally and analytically. Experiments were performed on nine RC beams: one beam was not exposed to fire (control specimen) and eight beams were divided into two groups exposed to fire for 30 and 60 min. In each group, one beam was not retrofitted, whereas the other three beams were retrofitted using NSM GFRP. After retrofitting, all beams were loaded until failure. The experimental results confirmed that the retrofitting technique effectively recovered the strengths of postfire RC beams. The failure mode of the GFRP retrofitted beams was the peeling-off of concrete cover, whereas that of the control and unretrofitted postfire beams was flexural failure via the yielding of tension steel. The NSM GFRP retrofitting fully recovered or significantly increased the yield and ultimate strengths of postfire RC beams by up to 39%. The yield deflection capacity of the NSM GFRP retrofitted postfire beams was much higher than that of the control beam; however, the ultimate deflection capacity of these beams significantly decreased. Consequently, the GFRP retrofitted postfire beams were of low ductility because of the peeling-off of the concrete cover. NSM GFRP retrofitting slightly improved but did not completely recover the yield stiffness reduced by fire, whereas it increased the plastic stiffness significantly by up to threefold. An analytical model for estimating the yield moment of postfire RC beams without/with NSM GFRP retrofitting was proposed, considering the very limited information, for example, fire duration obtained from actual fire events. The practicality and reasonable accuracy of the proposed model render it beneficial for structural engineers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction 工程技术-材料科学:复合
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
102
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Composites for Construction publishes original research papers, review papers, and case studies dealing with the use of fiber-reinforced composite materials in construction. Of special interest to the Journal are papers that bridge the gap between research in the mechanics and manufacturing science of composite materials and the analysis and design of large civil engineering structural systems and their construction processes. The Journal publishes papers about composite materials consisting of continuous synthetic fibers and matrices for use in civil engineering structures and subjected to the loadings and environments of the infrastructure. The Journal publishes papers about composite materials in stand-alone forms (e.g., structural shapes) or used in conjunction with traditional construction materials such as concrete, masonry, metals and timber, either as reinforcing members or in hybrid systems, for both new construction and for repair and rehabilitation of existing structures. The Journal also publishes papers about codes and standards related to fiber-reinforced composites for construction.
期刊最新文献
Innovative Connection Systems for Sand-Coated and Helically Wrapped Glass Fiber–Reinforced Polymer Bars Effect of Spike Anchors in the Bond Behavior of FRCM Systems Applied onto Curved Masonry Substrates Bond Durability of Near-Surface-Mounted BFRP and GFRP Bars in Aggressive Environments Experimental Study on the Working Mechanism of Bond-Type Anchorages for CFRP Tendons with Surface and Metallic Ribs Bond-Dependent Coefficient k b for New-Generation GFRP Bars
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1