{"title":"NSM GFRP对火灾后钢筋混凝土梁的加固:实验与理论模型","authors":"Vu Nguyen Nguyen, Vui Van Cao","doi":"10.1061/jccof2.cceng-3933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effectiveness of near-surface mounted glass fiber–reinforced polymer (NSM GFRP) retrofitting of reinforced concrete (RC) beams after exposure to fire is investigated in this study both experimentally and analytically. Experiments were performed on nine RC beams: one beam was not exposed to fire (control specimen) and eight beams were divided into two groups exposed to fire for 30 and 60 min. In each group, one beam was not retrofitted, whereas the other three beams were retrofitted using NSM GFRP. After retrofitting, all beams were loaded until failure. The experimental results confirmed that the retrofitting technique effectively recovered the strengths of postfire RC beams. The failure mode of the GFRP retrofitted beams was the peeling-off of concrete cover, whereas that of the control and unretrofitted postfire beams was flexural failure via the yielding of tension steel. The NSM GFRP retrofitting fully recovered or significantly increased the yield and ultimate strengths of postfire RC beams by up to 39%. The yield deflection capacity of the NSM GFRP retrofitted postfire beams was much higher than that of the control beam; however, the ultimate deflection capacity of these beams significantly decreased. Consequently, the GFRP retrofitted postfire beams were of low ductility because of the peeling-off of the concrete cover. NSM GFRP retrofitting slightly improved but did not completely recover the yield stiffness reduced by fire, whereas it increased the plastic stiffness significantly by up to threefold. An analytical model for estimating the yield moment of postfire RC beams without/with NSM GFRP retrofitting was proposed, considering the very limited information, for example, fire duration obtained from actual fire events. The practicality and reasonable accuracy of the proposed model render it beneficial for structural engineers.","PeriodicalId":15540,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Composites for Construction","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NSM GFRP Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams after Exposure to Fire: Experiments and Theoretical Model\",\"authors\":\"Vu Nguyen Nguyen, Vui Van Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1061/jccof2.cceng-3933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The effectiveness of near-surface mounted glass fiber–reinforced polymer (NSM GFRP) retrofitting of reinforced concrete (RC) beams after exposure to fire is investigated in this study both experimentally and analytically. Experiments were performed on nine RC beams: one beam was not exposed to fire (control specimen) and eight beams were divided into two groups exposed to fire for 30 and 60 min. In each group, one beam was not retrofitted, whereas the other three beams were retrofitted using NSM GFRP. After retrofitting, all beams were loaded until failure. The experimental results confirmed that the retrofitting technique effectively recovered the strengths of postfire RC beams. The failure mode of the GFRP retrofitted beams was the peeling-off of concrete cover, whereas that of the control and unretrofitted postfire beams was flexural failure via the yielding of tension steel. The NSM GFRP retrofitting fully recovered or significantly increased the yield and ultimate strengths of postfire RC beams by up to 39%. The yield deflection capacity of the NSM GFRP retrofitted postfire beams was much higher than that of the control beam; however, the ultimate deflection capacity of these beams significantly decreased. Consequently, the GFRP retrofitted postfire beams were of low ductility because of the peeling-off of the concrete cover. NSM GFRP retrofitting slightly improved but did not completely recover the yield stiffness reduced by fire, whereas it increased the plastic stiffness significantly by up to threefold. An analytical model for estimating the yield moment of postfire RC beams without/with NSM GFRP retrofitting was proposed, considering the very limited information, for example, fire duration obtained from actual fire events. The practicality and reasonable accuracy of the proposed model render it beneficial for structural engineers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Composites for Construction\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Composites for Construction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1061/jccof2.cceng-3933\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Composites for Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/jccof2.cceng-3933","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
NSM GFRP Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams after Exposure to Fire: Experiments and Theoretical Model
The effectiveness of near-surface mounted glass fiber–reinforced polymer (NSM GFRP) retrofitting of reinforced concrete (RC) beams after exposure to fire is investigated in this study both experimentally and analytically. Experiments were performed on nine RC beams: one beam was not exposed to fire (control specimen) and eight beams were divided into two groups exposed to fire for 30 and 60 min. In each group, one beam was not retrofitted, whereas the other three beams were retrofitted using NSM GFRP. After retrofitting, all beams were loaded until failure. The experimental results confirmed that the retrofitting technique effectively recovered the strengths of postfire RC beams. The failure mode of the GFRP retrofitted beams was the peeling-off of concrete cover, whereas that of the control and unretrofitted postfire beams was flexural failure via the yielding of tension steel. The NSM GFRP retrofitting fully recovered or significantly increased the yield and ultimate strengths of postfire RC beams by up to 39%. The yield deflection capacity of the NSM GFRP retrofitted postfire beams was much higher than that of the control beam; however, the ultimate deflection capacity of these beams significantly decreased. Consequently, the GFRP retrofitted postfire beams were of low ductility because of the peeling-off of the concrete cover. NSM GFRP retrofitting slightly improved but did not completely recover the yield stiffness reduced by fire, whereas it increased the plastic stiffness significantly by up to threefold. An analytical model for estimating the yield moment of postfire RC beams without/with NSM GFRP retrofitting was proposed, considering the very limited information, for example, fire duration obtained from actual fire events. The practicality and reasonable accuracy of the proposed model render it beneficial for structural engineers.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Composites for Construction publishes original research papers, review papers, and case studies dealing with the use of fiber-reinforced composite materials in construction. Of special interest to the Journal are papers that bridge the gap between research in the mechanics and manufacturing science of composite materials and the analysis and design of large civil engineering structural systems and their construction processes. The Journal publishes papers about composite materials consisting of continuous synthetic fibers and matrices for use in civil engineering structures and subjected to the loadings and environments of the infrastructure. The Journal publishes papers about composite materials in stand-alone forms (e.g., structural shapes) or used in conjunction with traditional construction materials such as concrete, masonry, metals and timber, either as reinforcing members or in hybrid systems, for both new construction and for repair and rehabilitation of existing structures. The Journal also publishes papers about codes and standards related to fiber-reinforced composites for construction.