{"title":"劳动力再分配和区域温室气体倡议","authors":"R. Kaj Gittings, Travis Roach","doi":"10.1080/21606544.2023.2206583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTABSTRACTPolicies intended to reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emissions are among the most hotly debated policy problems of our time. Among the concerns raised are that costs will be passed on to consumers and jobs will be lost. We use the introduction and eventual tightening of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), a regional carbon permit system in the Northeastern United States, to measure labor market responses and dynamics following the implementation of a carbon pricing system. We find that implementation of the RGGI and the subsequent tightening of the emissions cap has had no effect on employment or earnings in the utilities sector but increased the rate at which workers flow in and out of jobs. In particular, within the utilities sector, we observe some job destruction and worker separation combined with increased labor reallocation across establishments. This is complemented with small spillover effects yielding positive increases in hiring, worker reallocation and job creation in industries outside of utilities. Furthermore, when we account for the endogeneity of electricity prices we find increased hiring, job creation and worker reallocation rates and a decline in job destruction rates across industries.KEYWORDS: Carbon emissionsclimate policylabor market dynamicsJEL CODES: J23L94Q48Q52 AcknowledgmentsWe are thankful for comments on early drafts of this work by R. Bruce Williamson of the Maine Public Utilities Commission, and discussants and session participants of the AERE@WEAI sessions of the WEAI conference.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":44903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Labor reallocation and the regional greenhouse gas initiative\",\"authors\":\"R. Kaj Gittings, Travis Roach\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21606544.2023.2206583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTABSTRACTPolicies intended to reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emissions are among the most hotly debated policy problems of our time. Among the concerns raised are that costs will be passed on to consumers and jobs will be lost. We use the introduction and eventual tightening of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), a regional carbon permit system in the Northeastern United States, to measure labor market responses and dynamics following the implementation of a carbon pricing system. We find that implementation of the RGGI and the subsequent tightening of the emissions cap has had no effect on employment or earnings in the utilities sector but increased the rate at which workers flow in and out of jobs. In particular, within the utilities sector, we observe some job destruction and worker separation combined with increased labor reallocation across establishments. This is complemented with small spillover effects yielding positive increases in hiring, worker reallocation and job creation in industries outside of utilities. Furthermore, when we account for the endogeneity of electricity prices we find increased hiring, job creation and worker reallocation rates and a decline in job destruction rates across industries.KEYWORDS: Carbon emissionsclimate policylabor market dynamicsJEL CODES: J23L94Q48Q52 AcknowledgmentsWe are thankful for comments on early drafts of this work by R. Bruce Williamson of the Maine Public Utilities Commission, and discussants and session participants of the AERE@WEAI sessions of the WEAI conference.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":44903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2023.2206583\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2023.2206583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
旨在减少温室气体排放量的政策是我们这个时代争论最激烈的政策问题之一。人们提出的担忧之一是,成本将转嫁给消费者,就业机会将会减少。我们利用区域温室气体倡议(RGGI)(美国东北部的一项区域碳许可制度)的引入和最终收紧,来衡量碳定价体系实施后劳动力市场的反应和动态。我们发现,RGGI的实施和随后排放上限的收紧对公用事业部门的就业或收入没有影响,但增加了工人流入和流出工作岗位的速度。特别是在公用事业部门,我们观察到一些工作岗位的破坏和工人的分离,以及企业间劳动力重新分配的增加。与此相辅相成的是,在公用事业以外的行业,小规模的溢出效应带来了招聘、工人再分配和就业创造的积极增长。此外,当我们考虑到电价的内质性时,我们发现各个行业的招聘、就业创造和工人再分配率都有所增加,就业破坏率有所下降。关键词:碳排放,气候政策,劳动力市场动态jj23l94q48q52致谢感谢缅因州公用事业委员会的R. Bruce Williamson,以及WEAI会议AERE@WEAI会议的讨论嘉宾和与会者对本文早期草稿的评论。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
Labor reallocation and the regional greenhouse gas initiative
ABSTRACTABSTRACTPolicies intended to reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emissions are among the most hotly debated policy problems of our time. Among the concerns raised are that costs will be passed on to consumers and jobs will be lost. We use the introduction and eventual tightening of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), a regional carbon permit system in the Northeastern United States, to measure labor market responses and dynamics following the implementation of a carbon pricing system. We find that implementation of the RGGI and the subsequent tightening of the emissions cap has had no effect on employment or earnings in the utilities sector but increased the rate at which workers flow in and out of jobs. In particular, within the utilities sector, we observe some job destruction and worker separation combined with increased labor reallocation across establishments. This is complemented with small spillover effects yielding positive increases in hiring, worker reallocation and job creation in industries outside of utilities. Furthermore, when we account for the endogeneity of electricity prices we find increased hiring, job creation and worker reallocation rates and a decline in job destruction rates across industries.KEYWORDS: Carbon emissionsclimate policylabor market dynamicsJEL CODES: J23L94Q48Q52 AcknowledgmentsWe are thankful for comments on early drafts of this work by R. Bruce Williamson of the Maine Public Utilities Commission, and discussants and session participants of the AERE@WEAI sessions of the WEAI conference.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).