劳动力再分配和区域温室气体倡议

IF 1.9 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy Pub Date : 2023-06-13 DOI:10.1080/21606544.2023.2206583
R. Kaj Gittings, Travis Roach
{"title":"劳动力再分配和区域温室气体倡议","authors":"R. Kaj Gittings, Travis Roach","doi":"10.1080/21606544.2023.2206583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTABSTRACTPolicies intended to reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emissions are among the most hotly debated policy problems of our time. Among the concerns raised are that costs will be passed on to consumers and jobs will be lost. We use the introduction and eventual tightening of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), a regional carbon permit system in the Northeastern United States, to measure labor market responses and dynamics following the implementation of a carbon pricing system. We find that implementation of the RGGI and the subsequent tightening of the emissions cap has had no effect on employment or earnings in the utilities sector but increased the rate at which workers flow in and out of jobs. In particular, within the utilities sector, we observe some job destruction and worker separation combined with increased labor reallocation across establishments. This is complemented with small spillover effects yielding positive increases in hiring, worker reallocation and job creation in industries outside of utilities. Furthermore, when we account for the endogeneity of electricity prices we find increased hiring, job creation and worker reallocation rates and a decline in job destruction rates across industries.KEYWORDS: Carbon emissionsclimate policylabor market dynamicsJEL CODES: J23L94Q48Q52 AcknowledgmentsWe are thankful for comments on early drafts of this work by R. Bruce Williamson of the Maine Public Utilities Commission, and discussants and session participants of the AERE@WEAI sessions of the WEAI conference.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":44903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Labor reallocation and the regional greenhouse gas initiative\",\"authors\":\"R. Kaj Gittings, Travis Roach\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21606544.2023.2206583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTABSTRACTPolicies intended to reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emissions are among the most hotly debated policy problems of our time. Among the concerns raised are that costs will be passed on to consumers and jobs will be lost. We use the introduction and eventual tightening of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), a regional carbon permit system in the Northeastern United States, to measure labor market responses and dynamics following the implementation of a carbon pricing system. We find that implementation of the RGGI and the subsequent tightening of the emissions cap has had no effect on employment or earnings in the utilities sector but increased the rate at which workers flow in and out of jobs. In particular, within the utilities sector, we observe some job destruction and worker separation combined with increased labor reallocation across establishments. This is complemented with small spillover effects yielding positive increases in hiring, worker reallocation and job creation in industries outside of utilities. Furthermore, when we account for the endogeneity of electricity prices we find increased hiring, job creation and worker reallocation rates and a decline in job destruction rates across industries.KEYWORDS: Carbon emissionsclimate policylabor market dynamicsJEL CODES: J23L94Q48Q52 AcknowledgmentsWe are thankful for comments on early drafts of this work by R. Bruce Williamson of the Maine Public Utilities Commission, and discussants and session participants of the AERE@WEAI sessions of the WEAI conference.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":44903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2023.2206583\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2023.2206583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

旨在减少温室气体排放量的政策是我们这个时代争论最激烈的政策问题之一。人们提出的担忧之一是,成本将转嫁给消费者,就业机会将会减少。我们利用区域温室气体倡议(RGGI)(美国东北部的一项区域碳许可制度)的引入和最终收紧,来衡量碳定价体系实施后劳动力市场的反应和动态。我们发现,RGGI的实施和随后排放上限的收紧对公用事业部门的就业或收入没有影响,但增加了工人流入和流出工作岗位的速度。特别是在公用事业部门,我们观察到一些工作岗位的破坏和工人的分离,以及企业间劳动力重新分配的增加。与此相辅相成的是,在公用事业以外的行业,小规模的溢出效应带来了招聘、工人再分配和就业创造的积极增长。此外,当我们考虑到电价的内质性时,我们发现各个行业的招聘、就业创造和工人再分配率都有所增加,就业破坏率有所下降。关键词:碳排放,气候政策,劳动力市场动态jj23l94q48q52致谢感谢缅因州公用事业委员会的R. Bruce Williamson,以及WEAI会议AERE@WEAI会议的讨论嘉宾和与会者对本文早期草稿的评论。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Labor reallocation and the regional greenhouse gas initiative
ABSTRACTABSTRACTPolicies intended to reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emissions are among the most hotly debated policy problems of our time. Among the concerns raised are that costs will be passed on to consumers and jobs will be lost. We use the introduction and eventual tightening of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), a regional carbon permit system in the Northeastern United States, to measure labor market responses and dynamics following the implementation of a carbon pricing system. We find that implementation of the RGGI and the subsequent tightening of the emissions cap has had no effect on employment or earnings in the utilities sector but increased the rate at which workers flow in and out of jobs. In particular, within the utilities sector, we observe some job destruction and worker separation combined with increased labor reallocation across establishments. This is complemented with small spillover effects yielding positive increases in hiring, worker reallocation and job creation in industries outside of utilities. Furthermore, when we account for the endogeneity of electricity prices we find increased hiring, job creation and worker reallocation rates and a decline in job destruction rates across industries.KEYWORDS: Carbon emissionsclimate policylabor market dynamicsJEL CODES: J23L94Q48Q52 AcknowledgmentsWe are thankful for comments on early drafts of this work by R. Bruce Williamson of the Maine Public Utilities Commission, and discussants and session participants of the AERE@WEAI sessions of the WEAI conference.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Animal-welfare-labelled meat is not a stepping stone to animal-free diets: empirical evidence from a survey The fishing industry and the growing food insecurity in Africa: an empirical analysis with an instrumented quantile approach Costless CO 2 emissions abatement through improved government effectiveness The economics of waste oil recycling in the EU Innovation barriers as triggers of firms’ eco-innovations: the mediating role of public and market knowledge sourcing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1