{"title":"评估基于gliriicidia农林业的干预措施对赞比亚东部省作物营养、抗营养、功能和矿物成分的影响","authors":"Emmanuel Oladeji Alamu, Njoloma Joyce, Akello Juliet, Ngumayo Joel, Ray Chazangwe, Mehreteab Tesfai, Chikoye David, Nyoka Isaac, Dale Lewis, Nagothu Udaya Sekhar","doi":"10.1080/21683565.2023.2254711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTAgroforestry practices improve soil health which in turn improves crop nutrient concentrations and quality. This study examined how the agroforestry tree Gliricidia sepium intercropped with soybean, groundnuts, or maize affects crop nutrient compositions. The study was conducted in five Zambian chiefdoms for three crop-growing seasons (2019–2022) on 13 farmer-led demonstration trial sites. Seven treatments were tested that included maize, soybean, and groundnut plots with and without Gliricidia interventions. Grain samples were analyzed for crop nutrient contents using standard laboratory methods. Results showed that the treatments significantly (P < 0.05) improved maize nutritional properties except for crude fiber, total carbohydrate, and metabolizable energy. G. sepium intercropping with maize and soybean decreased the antinutritional contents and displayed better functional qualities. All elemental mineral components (except potassium, calcium, and sodium) were higher in the Gliricidia + maize intercrop than in the control treatment. The Gliricidia+soybean intercrop had lower mean mineral concentrations than the control (soybean only) except for Mg, Cu, and Zn. The Giliricidia+groundnut intercrop significantly increased groundnut mineral components except for Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium, and Iron. It can be concluded that G. sepium intercropped with maize, soybean, and groundnuts significantly improved the crops’ nutritional quality.KEYWORDS: AgroforestryZambiaGliricidia sepiumlegumesnutritional qualitymineral AcknowledgmentsThe authors acknowledge the financial support from NORAD/Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Norway, and the support of all farmers participating in the study.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data supporting this study’s findings are openly available at https://doi.org/10.25502/0fa9-dm27/d.Supplemental dataSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2023.2254711.Additional informationFundingThis project has received funding from the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) under Saksnr: 1800165-18.","PeriodicalId":48958,"journal":{"name":"Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the impact of <i>Gliricidia</i> agroforestry-based interventions on crop nutritional, antinutritional, functional, and mineral compositions in eastern Province, Zambia\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel Oladeji Alamu, Njoloma Joyce, Akello Juliet, Ngumayo Joel, Ray Chazangwe, Mehreteab Tesfai, Chikoye David, Nyoka Isaac, Dale Lewis, Nagothu Udaya Sekhar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21683565.2023.2254711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTAgroforestry practices improve soil health which in turn improves crop nutrient concentrations and quality. This study examined how the agroforestry tree Gliricidia sepium intercropped with soybean, groundnuts, or maize affects crop nutrient compositions. The study was conducted in five Zambian chiefdoms for three crop-growing seasons (2019–2022) on 13 farmer-led demonstration trial sites. Seven treatments were tested that included maize, soybean, and groundnut plots with and without Gliricidia interventions. Grain samples were analyzed for crop nutrient contents using standard laboratory methods. Results showed that the treatments significantly (P < 0.05) improved maize nutritional properties except for crude fiber, total carbohydrate, and metabolizable energy. G. sepium intercropping with maize and soybean decreased the antinutritional contents and displayed better functional qualities. All elemental mineral components (except potassium, calcium, and sodium) were higher in the Gliricidia + maize intercrop than in the control treatment. The Gliricidia+soybean intercrop had lower mean mineral concentrations than the control (soybean only) except for Mg, Cu, and Zn. The Giliricidia+groundnut intercrop significantly increased groundnut mineral components except for Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium, and Iron. It can be concluded that G. sepium intercropped with maize, soybean, and groundnuts significantly improved the crops’ nutritional quality.KEYWORDS: AgroforestryZambiaGliricidia sepiumlegumesnutritional qualitymineral AcknowledgmentsThe authors acknowledge the financial support from NORAD/Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Norway, and the support of all farmers participating in the study.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data supporting this study’s findings are openly available at https://doi.org/10.25502/0fa9-dm27/d.Supplemental dataSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2023.2254711.Additional informationFundingThis project has received funding from the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) under Saksnr: 1800165-18.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2023.2254711\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2023.2254711","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing the impact of Gliricidia agroforestry-based interventions on crop nutritional, antinutritional, functional, and mineral compositions in eastern Province, Zambia
ABSTRACTAgroforestry practices improve soil health which in turn improves crop nutrient concentrations and quality. This study examined how the agroforestry tree Gliricidia sepium intercropped with soybean, groundnuts, or maize affects crop nutrient compositions. The study was conducted in five Zambian chiefdoms for three crop-growing seasons (2019–2022) on 13 farmer-led demonstration trial sites. Seven treatments were tested that included maize, soybean, and groundnut plots with and without Gliricidia interventions. Grain samples were analyzed for crop nutrient contents using standard laboratory methods. Results showed that the treatments significantly (P < 0.05) improved maize nutritional properties except for crude fiber, total carbohydrate, and metabolizable energy. G. sepium intercropping with maize and soybean decreased the antinutritional contents and displayed better functional qualities. All elemental mineral components (except potassium, calcium, and sodium) were higher in the Gliricidia + maize intercrop than in the control treatment. The Gliricidia+soybean intercrop had lower mean mineral concentrations than the control (soybean only) except for Mg, Cu, and Zn. The Giliricidia+groundnut intercrop significantly increased groundnut mineral components except for Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium, and Iron. It can be concluded that G. sepium intercropped with maize, soybean, and groundnuts significantly improved the crops’ nutritional quality.KEYWORDS: AgroforestryZambiaGliricidia sepiumlegumesnutritional qualitymineral AcknowledgmentsThe authors acknowledge the financial support from NORAD/Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Norway, and the support of all farmers participating in the study.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data supporting this study’s findings are openly available at https://doi.org/10.25502/0fa9-dm27/d.Supplemental dataSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2023.2254711.Additional informationFundingThis project has received funding from the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) under Saksnr: 1800165-18.
期刊介绍:
Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems is devoted to the rapidly emerging fields of agroecology and food system sustainability. By linking scientific inquiry and productive practice with transformative social action, agroecology provides a foundation for developing the alternative food systems of the future. The journal focuses on the changes that need to occur in the design and management of our food systems in order to balance natural resource use and environmental protection with the needs of production, economic viability, food security, and the social well-being of all people.
Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems examines our current food systems from production to consumption, and the urgent need to transition to long-term sustainability. The journal promotes the study and application of agroecology for developing alternatives to the complex problems of resource depletion, environmental degradation, a narrowing of agrobiodiversity, continued world hunger, consolidation and industrialization of the food system, climate change, and the loss of farm land. The journal uses a food systems approach, and seeks experiences in agroecology that are on-farm, participatory, change-oriented, and backed by broad-based methodologies of sustainability analysis and evaluation.