使用基于人工智能的检测器来控制ESL写作中的人工智能辅助抄袭:“终结者对机器”

IF 2.1 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Language Testing in Asia Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI:10.1186/s40468-023-00260-2
Karim Ibrahim
{"title":"使用基于人工智能的检测器来控制ESL写作中的人工智能辅助抄袭:“终结者对机器”","authors":"Karim Ibrahim","doi":"10.1186/s40468-023-00260-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The release of ChatGPT marked the beginning of a new era of AI-assisted plagiarism that disrupts traditional assessment practices in ESL composition. In the face of this challenge, educators are left with little guidance in controlling AI-assisted plagiarism, especially when conventional methods fail to detect AI-generated texts. One approach to managing AI-assisted plagiarism is using fine-tuned AI classifiers, such as RoBERTa, to identify machine-generated texts; however, the reliability of this approach is yet to be established. To address the challenge of AI-assisted plagiarism in ESL contexts, the present cross-disciplinary descriptive study examined the potential of two RoBERTa-based classifiers to control AI-assisted plagiarism on a dataset of 240 human-written and ChatGPT-generated essays. Data analysis revealed that both platforms could identify AI-generated texts, but their detection accuracy was inconsistent across the dataset.","PeriodicalId":37050,"journal":{"name":"Language Testing in Asia","volume":"279 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using AI-based detectors to control AI-assisted plagiarism in ESL writing: “The Terminator Versus the Machines”\",\"authors\":\"Karim Ibrahim\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40468-023-00260-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The release of ChatGPT marked the beginning of a new era of AI-assisted plagiarism that disrupts traditional assessment practices in ESL composition. In the face of this challenge, educators are left with little guidance in controlling AI-assisted plagiarism, especially when conventional methods fail to detect AI-generated texts. One approach to managing AI-assisted plagiarism is using fine-tuned AI classifiers, such as RoBERTa, to identify machine-generated texts; however, the reliability of this approach is yet to be established. To address the challenge of AI-assisted plagiarism in ESL contexts, the present cross-disciplinary descriptive study examined the potential of two RoBERTa-based classifiers to control AI-assisted plagiarism on a dataset of 240 human-written and ChatGPT-generated essays. Data analysis revealed that both platforms could identify AI-generated texts, but their detection accuracy was inconsistent across the dataset.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Testing in Asia\",\"volume\":\"279 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Testing in Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00260-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Testing in Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00260-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

ChatGPT的发布标志着人工智能辅助抄袭新时代的开始,它颠覆了ESL作文中的传统评估实践。面对这一挑战,教育工作者在控制人工智能辅助抄袭方面几乎没有指导,特别是当传统方法无法检测人工智能生成的文本时。管理人工智能辅助抄袭的一种方法是使用微调的人工智能分类器(如RoBERTa)来识别机器生成的文本;但是,这种方法的可靠性还有待确定。为了解决ESL环境中人工智能辅助抄袭的挑战,本跨学科描述性研究检查了两个基于roberta的分类器在240篇人工写作和chatgpt生成的论文数据集中控制人工智能辅助抄袭的潜力。数据分析显示,这两个平台都可以识别人工智能生成的文本,但它们的检测精度在整个数据集中不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using AI-based detectors to control AI-assisted plagiarism in ESL writing: “The Terminator Versus the Machines”
Abstract The release of ChatGPT marked the beginning of a new era of AI-assisted plagiarism that disrupts traditional assessment practices in ESL composition. In the face of this challenge, educators are left with little guidance in controlling AI-assisted plagiarism, especially when conventional methods fail to detect AI-generated texts. One approach to managing AI-assisted plagiarism is using fine-tuned AI classifiers, such as RoBERTa, to identify machine-generated texts; however, the reliability of this approach is yet to be established. To address the challenge of AI-assisted plagiarism in ESL contexts, the present cross-disciplinary descriptive study examined the potential of two RoBERTa-based classifiers to control AI-assisted plagiarism on a dataset of 240 human-written and ChatGPT-generated essays. Data analysis revealed that both platforms could identify AI-generated texts, but their detection accuracy was inconsistent across the dataset.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Language Testing in Asia
Language Testing in Asia Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
28.60%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
The analysis of marking reliability through the approach of gauge repeatability and reproducibility (GR&R) study: a case of English-speaking test EFL teachers’ cognition of social and psychological consequences of high-stake national language tests: role of teacher training workshops Correction: A review study on discourse-analytical approaches to language testing policy in the South Korean context Indonesian secular vs. Madrasah schools: assessing the discrepancy in English reading and listening tests Correction: Using AI-based detectors to control AI-assisted plagiarism in ESL writing: “The Terminator Versus the Machines”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1