通过莎士比亚教授社会正义:为什么文艺复兴时期的文学很重要。希拉里·埃克伦德和温迪·贝丝·海曼编辑

Pub Date : 2023-02-25 DOI:10.1093/english/efac024
Adam Hansen
{"title":"通过莎士比亚教授社会正义:为什么文艺复兴时期的文学很重要。希拉里·埃克伦德和温迪·贝丝·海曼编辑","authors":"Adam Hansen","doi":"10.1093/english/efac024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a timely, provocative, and, above all, useful book. Wendy Beth Hyman and Hillary Eklund’s introduction to this collection begins by reflecting on how ‘citizens and journalists alike struggled to make sense’ of the ‘new Orwellian era’ inaugurated by Donald J. Trump’s presidency, an era which would ‘distort not only interpretation, but also memory’ (p. 1). These distortions betray how sites where critical thinking and progressive political action occur ‘have been subject to new forms of subterfuge’; this is ‘a grim era for American and European democracy’ (p. 2). Part of the struggle relates not only to trying to understand the vigour of the current incarnation of the ‘political lie’ (p. 1), but also to comprehend how Trump won at all. But because the collection is provocative, one might ask, in response: if Hillary Clinton not Trump had won, would this book still have been necessary, and timely? Well, yes. Just as the forces and conditions helping Trump win in 2016 have not altered sufficiently to prevent him from winning again in 2024, so, without fundamental socio-economic change (far beyond what Clinton promised), the conditions that cause social injustice are going nowhere. Acknowledging this raises another query, though: is the study of Shakespeare a valuable tool in combatting such social injustice? Perhaps not. As Steve Mentz asks in his chapter: ‘Maybe Shakespeare, with his keen eye for drama and the secret life of violence, loves Trump?’ (p. 136).1","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>Teaching Social Justice Through Shakespeare: Why Renaissance Literature Matters Now</i>. Edited by Hillary Eklund and Wendy Beth Hyman\",\"authors\":\"Adam Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/english/efac024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is a timely, provocative, and, above all, useful book. Wendy Beth Hyman and Hillary Eklund’s introduction to this collection begins by reflecting on how ‘citizens and journalists alike struggled to make sense’ of the ‘new Orwellian era’ inaugurated by Donald J. Trump’s presidency, an era which would ‘distort not only interpretation, but also memory’ (p. 1). These distortions betray how sites where critical thinking and progressive political action occur ‘have been subject to new forms of subterfuge’; this is ‘a grim era for American and European democracy’ (p. 2). Part of the struggle relates not only to trying to understand the vigour of the current incarnation of the ‘political lie’ (p. 1), but also to comprehend how Trump won at all. But because the collection is provocative, one might ask, in response: if Hillary Clinton not Trump had won, would this book still have been necessary, and timely? Well, yes. Just as the forces and conditions helping Trump win in 2016 have not altered sufficiently to prevent him from winning again in 2024, so, without fundamental socio-economic change (far beyond what Clinton promised), the conditions that cause social injustice are going nowhere. Acknowledging this raises another query, though: is the study of Shakespeare a valuable tool in combatting such social injustice? Perhaps not. As Steve Mentz asks in his chapter: ‘Maybe Shakespeare, with his keen eye for drama and the secret life of violence, loves Trump?’ (p. 136).1\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/english/efac024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/english/efac024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是一本及时的、具有煽动性的、最重要的是有用的书。温迪·贝丝·海曼和希拉里·埃克伦德对这本书的介绍一开始就反思了“公民和记者是如何努力理解”唐纳德·j·特朗普总统任期开启的“新奥威尔时代”的,这个时代“不仅扭曲了解释,而且扭曲了记忆”(第1页)。这些扭曲揭示了批判性思维和进步政治行动发生的地方是如何“受到新形式的诡计的影响”的;这是“美国和欧洲民主的严峻时代”(第2页)。斗争的一部分不仅涉及试图理解当前“政治谎言”化身的活力(第1页),还涉及理解特朗普究竟是如何获胜的。但因为这个系列具有挑衅性,有人可能会反问:如果是希拉里·克林顿(Hillary Clinton)而不是特朗普获胜,这本书还有必要吗?嗯,是的。正如帮助特朗普赢得2016年大选的力量和条件没有改变到足以阻止他在2024年再次获胜一样,如果没有根本性的社会经济变革(远远超出克林顿所承诺的),导致社会不公正的条件将无处可去。然而,承认这一点也引发了另一个问题:研究莎士比亚是对抗这种社会不公的一个有价值的工具吗?也许不是。正如史蒂夫·门茨(Steve Mentz)在他的章节中所问的那样:“也许莎士比亚喜欢特朗普,因为他对戏剧的敏锐眼光和暴力的秘密生活?(第136页)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Teaching Social Justice Through Shakespeare: Why Renaissance Literature Matters Now. Edited by Hillary Eklund and Wendy Beth Hyman
This is a timely, provocative, and, above all, useful book. Wendy Beth Hyman and Hillary Eklund’s introduction to this collection begins by reflecting on how ‘citizens and journalists alike struggled to make sense’ of the ‘new Orwellian era’ inaugurated by Donald J. Trump’s presidency, an era which would ‘distort not only interpretation, but also memory’ (p. 1). These distortions betray how sites where critical thinking and progressive political action occur ‘have been subject to new forms of subterfuge’; this is ‘a grim era for American and European democracy’ (p. 2). Part of the struggle relates not only to trying to understand the vigour of the current incarnation of the ‘political lie’ (p. 1), but also to comprehend how Trump won at all. But because the collection is provocative, one might ask, in response: if Hillary Clinton not Trump had won, would this book still have been necessary, and timely? Well, yes. Just as the forces and conditions helping Trump win in 2016 have not altered sufficiently to prevent him from winning again in 2024, so, without fundamental socio-economic change (far beyond what Clinton promised), the conditions that cause social injustice are going nowhere. Acknowledging this raises another query, though: is the study of Shakespeare a valuable tool in combatting such social injustice? Perhaps not. As Steve Mentz asks in his chapter: ‘Maybe Shakespeare, with his keen eye for drama and the secret life of violence, loves Trump?’ (p. 136).1
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1