低压气腹——为什么和如何

Jacob Rosenberg, Thomas Fuchs-Buder
{"title":"低压气腹——为什么和如何","authors":"Jacob Rosenberg, Thomas Fuchs-Buder","doi":"10.21037/ls-23-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In the field of laparoscopic surgery, there has been ongoing discussion regarding the optimal pressure for pneumoperitoneum. Until recently, there was limited data available regarding the effects of low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. However, a consensus has been established in most institutions, designating 12 mmHg as the standard pressure for laparoscopy, despite the existence of data on the beneficial effects of lower pressure levels without compromising patient safety. In order to achieve the lowest possible pressure for pneumoperitoneum without compromising patient safety, certain approaches have been suggested. Deep neuromuscular blockade has been proposed as a technique to reduce intraabdominal pressure by inducing muscle relaxation, allowing for lower insufflation pressures while maintaining adequate surgical exposure. This approach has shown promising results in terms of improving postoperative outcomes. However, further studies are needed to validate its efficacy and determine the optimal level of neuromuscular blockade required. In conclusion, the optimal pressure for pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery has been a subject of ongoing debate and research. Recent evidence suggests that low-pressure pneumoperitoneum may offer advantages in terms of reduced postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, and shoulder pain, without significant increases in complications or conversion rates. However, further studies are needed to fully elucidate the effects of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on various surgical procedures and patient populations. As laparoscopic surgery continues to evolve, a multidisciplinary approach involving surgeons, anesthesiologists, and researchers is essential to refine techniques and optimize patient care.","PeriodicalId":92818,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic surgery","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum—why and how\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Rosenberg, Thomas Fuchs-Buder\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/ls-23-10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": In the field of laparoscopic surgery, there has been ongoing discussion regarding the optimal pressure for pneumoperitoneum. Until recently, there was limited data available regarding the effects of low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. However, a consensus has been established in most institutions, designating 12 mmHg as the standard pressure for laparoscopy, despite the existence of data on the beneficial effects of lower pressure levels without compromising patient safety. In order to achieve the lowest possible pressure for pneumoperitoneum without compromising patient safety, certain approaches have been suggested. Deep neuromuscular blockade has been proposed as a technique to reduce intraabdominal pressure by inducing muscle relaxation, allowing for lower insufflation pressures while maintaining adequate surgical exposure. This approach has shown promising results in terms of improving postoperative outcomes. However, further studies are needed to validate its efficacy and determine the optimal level of neuromuscular blockade required. In conclusion, the optimal pressure for pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery has been a subject of ongoing debate and research. Recent evidence suggests that low-pressure pneumoperitoneum may offer advantages in terms of reduced postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, and shoulder pain, without significant increases in complications or conversion rates. However, further studies are needed to fully elucidate the effects of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on various surgical procedures and patient populations. As laparoscopic surgery continues to evolve, a multidisciplinary approach involving surgeons, anesthesiologists, and researchers is essential to refine techniques and optimize patient care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laparoscopic surgery\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laparoscopic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/ls-23-10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laparoscopic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/ls-23-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在腹腔镜手术领域,关于气腹的最佳压力一直在进行讨论。直到最近,关于低压气腹与标准压力气腹对术中和术后结果的影响的数据有限。然而,大多数机构已经达成共识,将12mmhg作为腹腔镜检查的标准压力,尽管有数据表明在不影响患者安全的情况下降低压力水平是有益的。为了在不影响患者安全的情况下实现气腹压力的尽可能低,已经提出了一些方法。深神经肌肉阻断术被认为是一种通过诱导肌肉松弛来降低腹内压力的技术,在保持足够的手术暴露的同时允许更低的注入压力。这种方法在改善术后预后方面显示出有希望的结果。然而,需要进一步的研究来验证其有效性,并确定所需的最佳神经肌肉阻断水平。总之,腹腔镜手术中气腹的最佳压力一直是一个持续争论和研究的主题。最近的证据表明,低压气腹可能在减少术后疼痛、镇痛药消耗和肩部疼痛方面具有优势,而不会显著增加并发症或转换率。然而,需要进一步的研究来充分阐明低压气腹对各种外科手术和患者群体的影响。随着腹腔镜手术的不断发展,涉及外科医生、麻醉师和研究人员的多学科方法对于改进技术和优化患者护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum—why and how
: In the field of laparoscopic surgery, there has been ongoing discussion regarding the optimal pressure for pneumoperitoneum. Until recently, there was limited data available regarding the effects of low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. However, a consensus has been established in most institutions, designating 12 mmHg as the standard pressure for laparoscopy, despite the existence of data on the beneficial effects of lower pressure levels without compromising patient safety. In order to achieve the lowest possible pressure for pneumoperitoneum without compromising patient safety, certain approaches have been suggested. Deep neuromuscular blockade has been proposed as a technique to reduce intraabdominal pressure by inducing muscle relaxation, allowing for lower insufflation pressures while maintaining adequate surgical exposure. This approach has shown promising results in terms of improving postoperative outcomes. However, further studies are needed to validate its efficacy and determine the optimal level of neuromuscular blockade required. In conclusion, the optimal pressure for pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery has been a subject of ongoing debate and research. Recent evidence suggests that low-pressure pneumoperitoneum may offer advantages in terms of reduced postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, and shoulder pain, without significant increases in complications or conversion rates. However, further studies are needed to fully elucidate the effects of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on various surgical procedures and patient populations. As laparoscopic surgery continues to evolve, a multidisciplinary approach involving surgeons, anesthesiologists, and researchers is essential to refine techniques and optimize patient care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Minimally-invasive multidisciplinary treatment of deep endometriosis: 103 cases Case report: neuroendocrine tumour causing torsion of the appendix in an adolescent—a rare and unexpected twist Is elective cholecystectomy effective in geriatric patients to prevent new biliopancreatic events following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for benign biliopancreatic pathology? Managing complex pancreatic anastomoses after minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy Laparoscopic management of giant adrenal cyst: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1