用于医疗器械临床评估的数字工具:授权监管作者的指南

Q2 Health Professions Medical Writing Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI:10.56012/hmts9332
Azza Gramoun
{"title":"用于医疗器械临床评估的数字工具:授权监管作者的指南","authors":"Azza Gramoun","doi":"10.56012/hmts9332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The implementation of the European Medical Device Regulation (EUMDR) has driven innovation in the digitalisation and the development of artificial intelligence (AI)- powered automations for regulatory writing. This article explores a selection of tools designed for device-related regulatory activities, high lighting their functionalities and use cases. The goals of the article are to demystify the role of AI in medical and regulatory writing, explain the process of developing AI-based automations, illustrate how these tools benefit medical writers, and most importantly enhance the readers’ skills in assessing such tools. The article discusses five automation tools: avasis, DistillerSR, Fern.ai, MedBoard, and Nested Knowledge, provid ing an overview of their features and benefits. The article concludes by emphasising that these automations address certain pain points faced during medical writing, yet they prioritise different features. By doing so, they empower users to improve data quality and streamline tasks in regulatory writing. Since there is no one-size-fits-all tool, the decision-making process is ultimately that of the user, not only on the type of tool to select but also on how best to leverage the software to optimise their technical documentation.","PeriodicalId":37384,"journal":{"name":"Medical Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital tools for the clinical evaluation of medical devices: A guide to empower regulatory writers\",\"authors\":\"Azza Gramoun\",\"doi\":\"10.56012/hmts9332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The implementation of the European Medical Device Regulation (EUMDR) has driven innovation in the digitalisation and the development of artificial intelligence (AI)- powered automations for regulatory writing. This article explores a selection of tools designed for device-related regulatory activities, high lighting their functionalities and use cases. The goals of the article are to demystify the role of AI in medical and regulatory writing, explain the process of developing AI-based automations, illustrate how these tools benefit medical writers, and most importantly enhance the readers’ skills in assessing such tools. The article discusses five automation tools: avasis, DistillerSR, Fern.ai, MedBoard, and Nested Knowledge, provid ing an overview of their features and benefits. The article concludes by emphasising that these automations address certain pain points faced during medical writing, yet they prioritise different features. By doing so, they empower users to improve data quality and streamline tasks in regulatory writing. Since there is no one-size-fits-all tool, the decision-making process is ultimately that of the user, not only on the type of tool to select but also on how best to leverage the software to optimise their technical documentation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Writing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56012/hmts9332\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56012/hmts9332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digital tools for the clinical evaluation of medical devices: A guide to empower regulatory writers
The implementation of the European Medical Device Regulation (EUMDR) has driven innovation in the digitalisation and the development of artificial intelligence (AI)- powered automations for regulatory writing. This article explores a selection of tools designed for device-related regulatory activities, high lighting their functionalities and use cases. The goals of the article are to demystify the role of AI in medical and regulatory writing, explain the process of developing AI-based automations, illustrate how these tools benefit medical writers, and most importantly enhance the readers’ skills in assessing such tools. The article discusses five automation tools: avasis, DistillerSR, Fern.ai, MedBoard, and Nested Knowledge, provid ing an overview of their features and benefits. The article concludes by emphasising that these automations address certain pain points faced during medical writing, yet they prioritise different features. By doing so, they empower users to improve data quality and streamline tasks in regulatory writing. Since there is no one-size-fits-all tool, the decision-making process is ultimately that of the user, not only on the type of tool to select but also on how best to leverage the software to optimise their technical documentation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Writing
Medical Writing Health Professions-Medical Terminology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Medical Writing is a quarterly publication that aims to educate and inform medical writers in Europe and beyond. Each issue focuses on a specific theme, and all issues include feature articles and regular columns on topics relevant to the practice of medical writing. We welcome articles providing practical advice to medical writers; guidelines and reviews/summaries/updates of guidelines published elsewhere; original research; opinion pieces; interviews; and review articles.
期刊最新文献
I did it so you don’t have to: Lessons learned as a young writer struggling with a regulatory document Overcoming confidential information challenges faced by study sponsors today Meet and Share session on protecting the public from undue harm during research studies: A report Medical Writing explores the many faces of biotechnology Harold Swanberg, MD: Why and how EMWA should remember him
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1