低水平激光治疗初级牙髓切开术的临床和影像学评价:一项随机临床试验

Mert Soyturk, Tuğba Yiğit
{"title":"低水平激光治疗初级牙髓切开术的临床和影像学评价:一项随机临床试验","authors":"Mert Soyturk, Tuğba Yiğit","doi":"10.36377/1683-2981-2023-21-3-173-180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of diode laser and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in primary pulpotomy treatments with deep dentinal caries. Materials and methods. The study comprised 90 patients (42 females and 48 males) aged 6–9 years with deep dentin caries in the lower second molar. The patients were assigned to the following treatment groups: the diode laser group (n^S= 45) or the LLLT group (n^S= 45). The appointments were scheduled 3, 6, and 12 months after the treatment, and both clinical and radiographic follow-ups were performed. Results. The diode laser group had a clinical success rate of 95.6% and a radiological success rate of 93.3% at 12 months, while the LLLT group had a clinical success rate of 97.7% and a radiological success rate of 90.9%. There were no statistically significant differences in the success rates of the two groups. Conclusions. LLLT+CH may be a good treatment alternative for pulpotomy instead of devital diode laser pulpotomy.","PeriodicalId":34648,"journal":{"name":"Endodontiia Today","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and radiographic evaluation of low-level laser therapy in primary teeth pulpotomy treatment: a randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Mert Soyturk, Tuğba Yiğit\",\"doi\":\"10.36377/1683-2981-2023-21-3-173-180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of diode laser and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in primary pulpotomy treatments with deep dentinal caries. Materials and methods. The study comprised 90 patients (42 females and 48 males) aged 6–9 years with deep dentin caries in the lower second molar. The patients were assigned to the following treatment groups: the diode laser group (n^S= 45) or the LLLT group (n^S= 45). The appointments were scheduled 3, 6, and 12 months after the treatment, and both clinical and radiographic follow-ups were performed. Results. The diode laser group had a clinical success rate of 95.6% and a radiological success rate of 93.3% at 12 months, while the LLLT group had a clinical success rate of 97.7% and a radiological success rate of 90.9%. There were no statistically significant differences in the success rates of the two groups. Conclusions. LLLT+CH may be a good treatment alternative for pulpotomy instead of devital diode laser pulpotomy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endodontiia Today\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endodontiia Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2023-21-3-173-180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endodontiia Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2023-21-3-173-180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

的目标。本研究的目的是比较二极管激光和低水平激光治疗(LLLT)在原发性牙髓切开术治疗深牙本质龋的效果。材料和方法。研究对象为90例6 ~ 9岁的下颌第二磨牙深牙本质龋患者(42例女性,48例男性)。将患者分为两组:二极管激光组(n^S= 45)和LLLT组(n^S= 45)。在治疗后3、6和12个月进行预约,并进行临床和影像学随访。结果。二极管激光组12个月临床成功率95.6%,放射成功率93.3%,LLLT组12个月临床成功率97.7%,放射成功率90.9%。两组患者的成功率差异无统计学意义。结论。LLLT+CH可能是牙髓切开术替代数字二极管激光牙髓切开术的良好治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of low-level laser therapy in primary teeth pulpotomy treatment: a randomized clinical trial
Aim. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of diode laser and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in primary pulpotomy treatments with deep dentinal caries. Materials and methods. The study comprised 90 patients (42 females and 48 males) aged 6–9 years with deep dentin caries in the lower second molar. The patients were assigned to the following treatment groups: the diode laser group (n^S= 45) or the LLLT group (n^S= 45). The appointments were scheduled 3, 6, and 12 months after the treatment, and both clinical and radiographic follow-ups were performed. Results. The diode laser group had a clinical success rate of 95.6% and a radiological success rate of 93.3% at 12 months, while the LLLT group had a clinical success rate of 97.7% and a radiological success rate of 90.9%. There were no statistically significant differences in the success rates of the two groups. Conclusions. LLLT+CH may be a good treatment alternative for pulpotomy instead of devital diode laser pulpotomy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative evaluation of methods fordetermining the width of the upper jaw in growing patients Some features of prevention of demineralization of hard tissues of teeth during orthodontic treatment of children with dental anomalies Corticotomy as a stage of complex treatment of orthodontic patients Compliance of endodontic treatment with clinical guidelines for dental care in periapical diseases Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of the frequency and structure of edentulism in elderly and senile people of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1