基于机器学习的缺失数据补全分析

IF 1.1 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS Cybernetics and Systems Pub Date : 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1080/01969722.2023.2247257
Syed Tahir Hussain Rizvi, Muhammad Yasir Latif, Muhammad Saad Amin, Achraf Jabeur Telmoudi, Nasir Ali Shah
{"title":"基于机器学习的缺失数据补全分析","authors":"Syed Tahir Hussain Rizvi, Muhammad Yasir Latif, Muhammad Saad Amin, Achraf Jabeur Telmoudi, Nasir Ali Shah","doi":"10.1080/01969722.2023.2247257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data analysis and classification can be affected by the availability of missing data in datasets. To deal with missing data, either deletion- or imputation-based methods are used that result in the reduction of data records or imputation of incorrect predicted value. Quality of imputed data can be significantly improved if missing values are generated accurately using machine learning algorithms. In this work, an analysis of machine learning-based algorithms for missing data imputation is performed. The K-nearest neighbors (KNN) and Sequential KNN (SKNN) algorithms are used to impute missing values in datasets using machine learning. Missing values handled using a statistical deletion approach (List-wise Deletion (LD)) and ML-based imputation methods (KNN and SKNN) are then tested and compared using different ML classifiers (Support Vector Machine and Decision Tree) to evaluate the effectiveness of imputed data. The used algorithms are compared in terms of accuracy, and results yielded that the ML-based imputation method (SKNN) outperforms the LD-based approach and KNN method in terms of the effectiveness of handling missing data in almost every dataset with both classification algorithms (SVM and DT).","PeriodicalId":55188,"journal":{"name":"Cybernetics and Systems","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Machine Learning Based Imputation of Missing Data\",\"authors\":\"Syed Tahir Hussain Rizvi, Muhammad Yasir Latif, Muhammad Saad Amin, Achraf Jabeur Telmoudi, Nasir Ali Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01969722.2023.2247257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Data analysis and classification can be affected by the availability of missing data in datasets. To deal with missing data, either deletion- or imputation-based methods are used that result in the reduction of data records or imputation of incorrect predicted value. Quality of imputed data can be significantly improved if missing values are generated accurately using machine learning algorithms. In this work, an analysis of machine learning-based algorithms for missing data imputation is performed. The K-nearest neighbors (KNN) and Sequential KNN (SKNN) algorithms are used to impute missing values in datasets using machine learning. Missing values handled using a statistical deletion approach (List-wise Deletion (LD)) and ML-based imputation methods (KNN and SKNN) are then tested and compared using different ML classifiers (Support Vector Machine and Decision Tree) to evaluate the effectiveness of imputed data. The used algorithms are compared in terms of accuracy, and results yielded that the ML-based imputation method (SKNN) outperforms the LD-based approach and KNN method in terms of the effectiveness of handling missing data in almost every dataset with both classification algorithms (SVM and DT).\",\"PeriodicalId\":55188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cybernetics and Systems\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cybernetics and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2023.2247257\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cybernetics and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2023.2247257","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数据集中缺失数据的可用性可能会影响数据分析和分类。为了处理缺失数据,可以使用基于删除或基于推测的方法来减少数据记录或推测不正确的预测值。如果使用机器学习算法准确地生成缺失值,则可以显著提高输入数据的质量。在这项工作中,对基于机器学习的缺失数据输入算法进行了分析。使用k近邻(KNN)和顺序KNN (SKNN)算法使用机器学习来估算数据集中的缺失值。然后使用统计删除方法(List-wise deletion (LD))和基于ML的输入方法(KNN和SKNN)进行测试和比较,使用不同的ML分类器(支持向量机和决策树)来评估输入数据的有效性。在精度方面比较了所使用的算法,结果表明,基于ml的imputation方法(SKNN)在处理几乎每个数据集的缺失数据方面都优于基于ld的方法和KNN方法,这两种分类算法(SVM和DT)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of Machine Learning Based Imputation of Missing Data
Data analysis and classification can be affected by the availability of missing data in datasets. To deal with missing data, either deletion- or imputation-based methods are used that result in the reduction of data records or imputation of incorrect predicted value. Quality of imputed data can be significantly improved if missing values are generated accurately using machine learning algorithms. In this work, an analysis of machine learning-based algorithms for missing data imputation is performed. The K-nearest neighbors (KNN) and Sequential KNN (SKNN) algorithms are used to impute missing values in datasets using machine learning. Missing values handled using a statistical deletion approach (List-wise Deletion (LD)) and ML-based imputation methods (KNN and SKNN) are then tested and compared using different ML classifiers (Support Vector Machine and Decision Tree) to evaluate the effectiveness of imputed data. The used algorithms are compared in terms of accuracy, and results yielded that the ML-based imputation method (SKNN) outperforms the LD-based approach and KNN method in terms of the effectiveness of handling missing data in almost every dataset with both classification algorithms (SVM and DT).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cybernetics and Systems
Cybernetics and Systems 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
99
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cybernetics and Systems aims to share the latest developments in cybernetics and systems to a global audience of academics working or interested in these areas. We bring together scientists from diverse disciplines and update them in important cybernetic and systems methods, while drawing attention to novel useful applications of these methods to problems from all areas of research, in the humanities, in the sciences and the technical disciplines. Showing a direct or likely benefit of the result(s) of the paper to humankind is welcome but not a prerequisite. We welcome original research that: -Improves methods of cybernetics, systems theory and systems research- Improves methods in complexity research- Shows novel useful applications of cybernetics and/or systems methods to problems in one or more areas in the humanities- Shows novel useful applications of cybernetics and/or systems methods to problems in one or more scientific disciplines- Shows novel useful applications of cybernetics and/or systems methods to technical problems- Shows novel applications in the arts
期刊最新文献
Hybrid Optimized LMMSE-Based Channel Estimation with Low Power Trellis Coded Modulation Statement of Retraction: An Efficient Resource Management Mechanism Based on Developed Political Optimizer in Fog Computing Ensemble Technique of Deep Learning Model for Identifying Tomato Leaf Diseases Based on Choquet Fuzzy Integral Development of Modified ECC-Based Secured FoG-Assisted Healthcare Data Management System in IoT-Enabled WSN Transformation with Yolo Tiny Network Architecture for Multimodal Fusion in Lung Disease Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1