危及自由民主:外交政策上的麻烦

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences Critical Policy Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI:10.1080/19460171.2023.2267631
Regina Queiroz
{"title":"危及自由民主:外交政策上的麻烦","authors":"Regina Queiroz","doi":"10.1080/19460171.2023.2267631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTFriedrich Hayek presents a demarchic conception of democracy as a solution for what he takes to be the inherently corrupt and totalitarian nature of liberal democracy. While still preserving the label ‘liberal representative democracy’, this Hayekian demarchy precludes parliamentary and governmental institutions from providing positive laws and policies on behalf of their constituents where this would require the transfer of the private property of individuals. Such laws and policies would, on this demarchic conception of liberal democracy, undermine individuals’ free usufruct. I argue that demarchy’s detachment from any concern with the well-being of many of its citizens is an illiberal and anti-democratic (sub)version of liberal democracy that increases populism and risks crushing liberal democracy between the pseudo- and anti-liberal support of a totalitarian majoritarian people’s sovereign power and a minoritarian anti-democratic elite. As such, liberal democracy conceived of in Hayekian demarchic terms is itself an oppressive totalitarian political theory incapable of preventing an increase in illiberal and anti-liberal political forces. Moreover, I argue that it is imperative that we acknowledge and appreciate the extent to which demarchy undermines, rather than strengthens, liberal democracy.KEYWORDS: Demarchyilliberalismliberal democracymarketspopulism AcknowledgmentsThe author is grateful for the helpful comments and suggestions of the anonymous reviewers and Britt Harrison.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. https://www.blaetter.de/aktuell/dokumente/»wir-werden-wege-finden-die-parlamentarische-mitbestimmung-so-zu-gestalten-dass-si, accessed 27th July.2. See Law No. 31/2012 of 14/08 (Lei n. 31/2012, de 14 de Agosto (pgdlisboa.pt) acceded 29 January 2021.3. The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [0].Notes on contributorsRegina QueirozRegina Queiroz is a researcher at IFILNOVA, NOVA University Lisbon, and teaches at Lusófona University. Her interests lie in the justice and rationality of social and political institutions, uniting Rawlsian theories of fairness, Aristotelian theories of phronesis, comparative analysis of liberalism and neoliberalism, and gender and racial discrimination.","PeriodicalId":51625,"journal":{"name":"Critical Policy Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jeopardizing liberal democracy: the trouble with demarchy\",\"authors\":\"Regina Queiroz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19460171.2023.2267631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTFriedrich Hayek presents a demarchic conception of democracy as a solution for what he takes to be the inherently corrupt and totalitarian nature of liberal democracy. While still preserving the label ‘liberal representative democracy’, this Hayekian demarchy precludes parliamentary and governmental institutions from providing positive laws and policies on behalf of their constituents where this would require the transfer of the private property of individuals. Such laws and policies would, on this demarchic conception of liberal democracy, undermine individuals’ free usufruct. I argue that demarchy’s detachment from any concern with the well-being of many of its citizens is an illiberal and anti-democratic (sub)version of liberal democracy that increases populism and risks crushing liberal democracy between the pseudo- and anti-liberal support of a totalitarian majoritarian people’s sovereign power and a minoritarian anti-democratic elite. As such, liberal democracy conceived of in Hayekian demarchic terms is itself an oppressive totalitarian political theory incapable of preventing an increase in illiberal and anti-liberal political forces. Moreover, I argue that it is imperative that we acknowledge and appreciate the extent to which demarchy undermines, rather than strengthens, liberal democracy.KEYWORDS: Demarchyilliberalismliberal democracymarketspopulism AcknowledgmentsThe author is grateful for the helpful comments and suggestions of the anonymous reviewers and Britt Harrison.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. https://www.blaetter.de/aktuell/dokumente/»wir-werden-wege-finden-die-parlamentarische-mitbestimmung-so-zu-gestalten-dass-si, accessed 27th July.2. See Law No. 31/2012 of 14/08 (Lei n. 31/2012, de 14 de Agosto (pgdlisboa.pt) acceded 29 January 2021.3. The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [0].Notes on contributorsRegina QueirozRegina Queiroz is a researcher at IFILNOVA, NOVA University Lisbon, and teaches at Lusófona University. Her interests lie in the justice and rationality of social and political institutions, uniting Rawlsian theories of fairness, Aristotelian theories of phronesis, comparative analysis of liberalism and neoliberalism, and gender and racial discrimination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Policy Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Policy Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2023.2267631\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2023.2267631","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要弗里德里希·哈耶克提出了民主的界定概念,作为他所认为的自由民主固有的腐败和极权本质的解决方案。虽然仍然保留了“自由代议制民主”的标签,但这种哈耶克式的政策排除了议会和政府机构代表其选民提供积极的法律和政策,这需要转移个人的私有财产。按照这种自由民主的界定概念,这样的法律和政策将破坏个人的自由用益权。我认为,demarchy对其许多公民福祉的任何关注都是自由民主的一种非自由主义和反民主(次)版本,它会增加民粹主义,并有可能在极权主义多数主义人民主权和少数主义反民主精英的伪自由主义和反自由主义支持之间摧毁自由民主。因此,哈耶克式的自由主义民主本身就是一种压迫性的极权主义政治理论,无法阻止非自由主义和反自由主义政治力量的增长。此外,我认为,我们必须承认并理解政策在多大程度上削弱(而不是加强)自由民主。关键词:自由主义自由民主市场民粹主义感谢匿名审稿人和Britt Harrison的宝贵意见和建议。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。https://www.blaetter.de/aktuell/dokumente/»wir-werden-wege-finden-die-parlamentarische- mitbestimung -so-zu-gestalten-dass-si,访问日期为7月27日。见2008年1月29日通过的第31/2012号法律(Lei n. 31/2012, de 14 de Agosto (pgdlisboa.pt))。作者报告说,没有相互竞争的利益需要申报。本研究得到了联合国科学技术基金会(funda o para a Ciência e a Tecnologia)的支持[0]。作者简介regina Queiroz regina Queiroz是里斯本NOVA大学IFILNOVA的研究员,并在Lusófona大学任教。她的兴趣在于社会和政治制度的正义和合理性,将罗尔斯的公平理论、亚里士多德的实践理论、自由主义和新自由主义的比较分析以及性别和种族歧视结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Jeopardizing liberal democracy: the trouble with demarchy
ABSTRACTFriedrich Hayek presents a demarchic conception of democracy as a solution for what he takes to be the inherently corrupt and totalitarian nature of liberal democracy. While still preserving the label ‘liberal representative democracy’, this Hayekian demarchy precludes parliamentary and governmental institutions from providing positive laws and policies on behalf of their constituents where this would require the transfer of the private property of individuals. Such laws and policies would, on this demarchic conception of liberal democracy, undermine individuals’ free usufruct. I argue that demarchy’s detachment from any concern with the well-being of many of its citizens is an illiberal and anti-democratic (sub)version of liberal democracy that increases populism and risks crushing liberal democracy between the pseudo- and anti-liberal support of a totalitarian majoritarian people’s sovereign power and a minoritarian anti-democratic elite. As such, liberal democracy conceived of in Hayekian demarchic terms is itself an oppressive totalitarian political theory incapable of preventing an increase in illiberal and anti-liberal political forces. Moreover, I argue that it is imperative that we acknowledge and appreciate the extent to which demarchy undermines, rather than strengthens, liberal democracy.KEYWORDS: Demarchyilliberalismliberal democracymarketspopulism AcknowledgmentsThe author is grateful for the helpful comments and suggestions of the anonymous reviewers and Britt Harrison.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. https://www.blaetter.de/aktuell/dokumente/»wir-werden-wege-finden-die-parlamentarische-mitbestimmung-so-zu-gestalten-dass-si, accessed 27th July.2. See Law No. 31/2012 of 14/08 (Lei n. 31/2012, de 14 de Agosto (pgdlisboa.pt) acceded 29 January 2021.3. The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [0].Notes on contributorsRegina QueirozRegina Queiroz is a researcher at IFILNOVA, NOVA University Lisbon, and teaches at Lusófona University. Her interests lie in the justice and rationality of social and political institutions, uniting Rawlsian theories of fairness, Aristotelian theories of phronesis, comparative analysis of liberalism and neoliberalism, and gender and racial discrimination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
A complementary approach to Critical Frame Analysis and ‘what is the policy represented to Be?’ Pragmatism over sovereignty? The Italian policy response to the infrastructuralization of non-EU cloud service providers Exploring counter hegemony and action research to address the climate crisis Social prescribing for and beyond health: hyper-solutionism in health policy What problems is the AI act solving? Technological solutionism, fundamental rights, and trustworthiness in European AI policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1