Elizabeth E. Burgin, Elizabeth A. Prosek, Kahyen Shin, Victoria L. Cunningham, Warren N. Ponder
{"title":"军人遗属需求评估:临床症状与亲子关系","authors":"Elizabeth E. Burgin, Elizabeth A. Prosek, Kahyen Shin, Victoria L. Cunningham, Warren N. Ponder","doi":"10.1080/21501378.2023.2257236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThere is limited empirical data to account for the mental health and parent-child relationship outcomes among bereaved military families. The implementation of appropriate programs and mental health interventions depends on the study of relevant demographic and mental health constructs. We report the findings of a needs assessment conducted at a nonprofit organization serving bereaved military families, inclusive of 64 families, with adolescent children (M = 15.04 years, SD = 5.01), who experienced service member loss due to combat (37.5%), suicide (15.6%), homicide or terrorism (10.9%), unintentional self-harm (n = 4.7%), accident (4.7%), or another circumstance (1.6%). Our results align with previous researchers’ findings that surviving military families are at greater risk for problematic grief outcomes, whereby generalized anxiety (t = −3.83, p = .003, d = −0.957) and depressive symptoms (t = −4.28, p = .003, d = −1.07) demonstrate significant differences among complicated and non-complicated grievers. We also found elevated levels of parenting stress. These findings inform recommendations for assessment, program development, and future research for mental health service providers.Keywords: Bereavementmilitaryfamiliesparent-child relationshipcomplicated grief Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by William & Mary and the College of Education at The Pennsylvania State University.Notes on contributorsElizabeth E. BurginElizabeth E. Burgin is an Assistant Professor and Program Coordinator of the Military & Veterans Counseling Program in the Department of School Psychology & Counselor Education at William & Mary.Elizabeth A. ProsekElizabeth A. Prosek is an Associate Professor in the Department of Educational Psychology, Counseling, and Special Education at Penn State University. Drs. Prosek and Burgin are authors of the ACA endorsed Exemplary Practices for Military Populations.Kahyen ShinKahyen Shin is a doctoral student in the Department of Educational Psychology, Counseling, and Special Education at Penn State University.Victoria L. CunninghamVictoria L. Cunningham is a doctoral student in the Department of Counseling and Higher Education at the University of North Texas.Warren N. PonderWarren N. Ponder is the Director of Outcomes and Evaluation at One Tribe Foundation.","PeriodicalId":37884,"journal":{"name":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","volume":"1131 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Needs Assessment of Surviving Military Families: Clinical Symptoms and the Parent-Child Relationship\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth E. Burgin, Elizabeth A. Prosek, Kahyen Shin, Victoria L. Cunningham, Warren N. Ponder\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21501378.2023.2257236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThere is limited empirical data to account for the mental health and parent-child relationship outcomes among bereaved military families. The implementation of appropriate programs and mental health interventions depends on the study of relevant demographic and mental health constructs. We report the findings of a needs assessment conducted at a nonprofit organization serving bereaved military families, inclusive of 64 families, with adolescent children (M = 15.04 years, SD = 5.01), who experienced service member loss due to combat (37.5%), suicide (15.6%), homicide or terrorism (10.9%), unintentional self-harm (n = 4.7%), accident (4.7%), or another circumstance (1.6%). Our results align with previous researchers’ findings that surviving military families are at greater risk for problematic grief outcomes, whereby generalized anxiety (t = −3.83, p = .003, d = −0.957) and depressive symptoms (t = −4.28, p = .003, d = −1.07) demonstrate significant differences among complicated and non-complicated grievers. We also found elevated levels of parenting stress. These findings inform recommendations for assessment, program development, and future research for mental health service providers.Keywords: Bereavementmilitaryfamiliesparent-child relationshipcomplicated grief Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by William & Mary and the College of Education at The Pennsylvania State University.Notes on contributorsElizabeth E. BurginElizabeth E. Burgin is an Assistant Professor and Program Coordinator of the Military & Veterans Counseling Program in the Department of School Psychology & Counselor Education at William & Mary.Elizabeth A. ProsekElizabeth A. Prosek is an Associate Professor in the Department of Educational Psychology, Counseling, and Special Education at Penn State University. Drs. Prosek and Burgin are authors of the ACA endorsed Exemplary Practices for Military Populations.Kahyen ShinKahyen Shin is a doctoral student in the Department of Educational Psychology, Counseling, and Special Education at Penn State University.Victoria L. CunninghamVictoria L. Cunningham is a doctoral student in the Department of Counseling and Higher Education at the University of North Texas.Warren N. PonderWarren N. Ponder is the Director of Outcomes and Evaluation at One Tribe Foundation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"1131 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2023.2257236\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2023.2257236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要目前,有关军人家属心理健康和亲子关系结果的实证数据有限。适当的计划和心理健康干预措施的实施取决于对相关人口统计学和心理健康结构的研究。我们报告了在一家为失去亲人的军人家庭服务的非营利组织进行的需求评估的结果,包括64个家庭,有青春期的孩子(M = 15.04岁,SD = 5.01),由于战斗(37.5%),自杀(15.6%),谋杀或恐怖主义(10.9%),无意的自残(n = 4.7%),事故(4.7%)或其他情况(1.6%)而经历了服务成员的损失。我们的研究结果与先前研究人员的发现一致,即幸存的军人家庭出现问题性悲伤结局的风险更大,其中广泛性焦虑(t = - 3.83, p = 0.003, d = - 0.957)和抑郁症状(t = - 4.28, p = 0.003, d = - 1.07)在复杂和非复杂悲伤者中表现出显著差异。我们还发现,父母的压力水平也在上升。这些发现为心理健康服务提供者的评估、项目开发和未来研究提供了建议。关键词:丧亲、军人、家庭、亲子关系、复杂悲痛披露声明作者未发现潜在利益冲突。本研究得到了威廉玛丽和宾夕法尼亚州立大学教育学院的支持。elizabeth E. Burgin是William & Mary学校心理与咨询教育部门的军事与退伍军人咨询项目的助理教授和项目协调员。Elizabeth A. Prosek是宾夕法尼亚州立大学教育心理、咨询和特殊教育系的副教授。Drs。Prosek和Burgin是ACA认可的军事人口示范实践的作者。Kahyen Shin是宾夕法尼亚州立大学教育心理、咨询和特殊教育系的博士生。Victoria L. Cunningham,北德克萨斯大学咨询与高等教育系博士生。Warren N. PonderWarren N. Ponder是一个部落基金会的结果和评估主任。
Needs Assessment of Surviving Military Families: Clinical Symptoms and the Parent-Child Relationship
AbstractThere is limited empirical data to account for the mental health and parent-child relationship outcomes among bereaved military families. The implementation of appropriate programs and mental health interventions depends on the study of relevant demographic and mental health constructs. We report the findings of a needs assessment conducted at a nonprofit organization serving bereaved military families, inclusive of 64 families, with adolescent children (M = 15.04 years, SD = 5.01), who experienced service member loss due to combat (37.5%), suicide (15.6%), homicide or terrorism (10.9%), unintentional self-harm (n = 4.7%), accident (4.7%), or another circumstance (1.6%). Our results align with previous researchers’ findings that surviving military families are at greater risk for problematic grief outcomes, whereby generalized anxiety (t = −3.83, p = .003, d = −0.957) and depressive symptoms (t = −4.28, p = .003, d = −1.07) demonstrate significant differences among complicated and non-complicated grievers. We also found elevated levels of parenting stress. These findings inform recommendations for assessment, program development, and future research for mental health service providers.Keywords: Bereavementmilitaryfamiliesparent-child relationshipcomplicated grief Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by William & Mary and the College of Education at The Pennsylvania State University.Notes on contributorsElizabeth E. BurginElizabeth E. Burgin is an Assistant Professor and Program Coordinator of the Military & Veterans Counseling Program in the Department of School Psychology & Counselor Education at William & Mary.Elizabeth A. ProsekElizabeth A. Prosek is an Associate Professor in the Department of Educational Psychology, Counseling, and Special Education at Penn State University. Drs. Prosek and Burgin are authors of the ACA endorsed Exemplary Practices for Military Populations.Kahyen ShinKahyen Shin is a doctoral student in the Department of Educational Psychology, Counseling, and Special Education at Penn State University.Victoria L. CunninghamVictoria L. Cunningham is a doctoral student in the Department of Counseling and Higher Education at the University of North Texas.Warren N. PonderWarren N. Ponder is the Director of Outcomes and Evaluation at One Tribe Foundation.
期刊介绍:
Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation (CORE) provides counselor educators, researchers, educators, and other mental health practitioners with outcome research and program evaluation practices for work with individuals across the lifespan. It addresses topics such as: treatment efficacy, clinical diagnosis, program evaluation, research design, outcome measure reviews. This journal also serves to address ethical, legal, and cultural concerns in the assessment of dependent variables, implementation of clinical interventions, and outcome research. Manuscripts typically fall into one of the following categories: Counseling Outcome Research: Treatment efficacy and effectiveness of mental health, school, addictions, rehabilitation, family, and college counseling interventions across the lifespan as reported in clinical trials, single-case research designs, single-group designs, and multi- or mixed-method designs.